Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Luke, the rapist? Are we talking the same Luke Spencer who put his teen sister out on a street corner hooking so he didn't have to work for living?

I've never seen any sign of Luke Spencer having a conscience. He's your basic big box store version of a sociopath.

I sure don't see that Elizabeth was negligent. The dumb kid was inside with the door closed where he should have been safe and sound. He obviously inherited his father's suicidal tendency gene and decided that was the day he wanted to kill himself. He was entirely too old to run out into the street like that. That's why I say he was an early onset suicide.

Or heck, maybe he was the victim of Frons, who dictated that Jake had to die to pave the way for the hooker to have Jason's child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen worse in real life. I saw a little girl jump out the window because the bed was by the window and the mother wasn't in the room. Lucky she landed on the landing underneath and her sibling pulled her back in. Scary stuff can happen when you turn your back on a child but I don't understand how Liz gets all the blame when drunken Luke was speeding down the road in their neighborhood, hit his grandchild, then fled and tried to blame someone else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's never Liz's fault. You can never blame the Madonna for anything. Santicous Webber must always be upheld in the utmost highest of regards. It would be too much for us to ask her to watch her children and tell them not to run in the street at night. That's too much for us to ask of any mother apparently. How dare us expect that from Elizabeth Webber the most noblest of all moms in PC. It must never be Liz's fault. It's the kids fault or everyone elses. Not Liz's.

Frons was the same one that green lighted the complete destruction of five characters and four relationships in order to get us to Jason and Liz's clandestine conception in the first place. Forgive me for not weeping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I learn for this conversation is that a mother should have her eyes on her child 24/7 and the U.S. court system take into consideration how complicated an "accidents" was when it come to D.U.I and an hit and run when the person who has been roll over has died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess my cousin's girlfriend should have her child taken away. She took her eyes off her daughter for all of five minutes at a party at the child's grandparents house and found her playing out front by the porch when they went to go look for her. She didn't realize that 24/7 she should have her eyes on her 4 year old even in familiar surroundings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can accept Luke the child killing rapist. What I can't accept is that seemingly bright women (Anna, Felicia, Heather, Holly, Skye, Tracy) fall all over themselves to be with the Luke. What is the allure other than the writers telling the viewers that Luke is a stud? <rolls eyes>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some viewers will buy anything that's being sold. Others are a bit more skeptical.

I've always thought Luke looked like an ostrich and I never believed a word that came out of his lying mouth, so his charm escaped me. He has always used women to get what he wants, something you would think a woman like Tracy would have noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not here in Texas...in fact just this week, a man was sitting in his stalled car on side of the freeway in Houston with his kid in the car when a drunk driver smashed into them and killed the kid. The father was drunk too, and he was charged with DWI and vehicular manslaughter. The drunken driver who crashed into the stalled car was charged only with DWI and was released on bail, while the father, who was not driving, remains behind bars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy