Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This DID story is too stupid for me to even go as in-depth with it as you guys have, lol. I just don't have the energy or desire to analyze it all. I do enjoy it because it's so batshit crazy and KS is such a hot mess and it's fun, IMO. But the story is completely senseless and for it to make any sense, it would have to rely on Kate being super anxious about reentering Sonny's life under GW, which she wasn't. She fought romantically reuniting with him, but she started re-associating with him after Olivia asked her to after, like, two times. And she only seemed mildly uncomfortable and the couple voiceover flashbacks to the wedding shooting didn't have enough weighty effect to be the 'signs' that she was terrified enough for an alter ego to protect her to emerge.

To me, RC's Connie is Kate's alter. Whereas Connie Falconeri and Kate Howard are the same character, just at different points in her life. Connie/Kate just evolved as a person over time, albeit because she forced the change in an effort to completely reinvent herself. But Guza and GW repeatedly displayed that Connie was gentle, understanding and instrumental in keeping Sonny from completely going off the deep end, even though that's exactly what happened when she left him. She may've been all Brooklyn like Lois and Olivia, but she wasn't, as NeNe Leakes says, a "trashy hooker" and she definitely wasn't a destructive psychopath. This Connie alter is definitely not the girlhood/teenage Connie we've been hearing about for the past five years.

But Olivia's motivations for keeping Dante from Sonny have also changed multiple times and make no sense. This wave of Bensonhurst characters' back-stories have not been well done, did the last wave (Lois and Cates boys) have such all-over-the-place back-stories, too? Even Dante's back-story with Brenda makes no sense. We know all these Bensonhurst characters grew up on the same block; he wouldn't ever have met Lois' best friend, Brenda? At a family thing--something? There wouldn't have been any talk of her being with the well-known-'round-those-parts Sonny? Something? Anything?

Anyway, even more than the DID, my biggest problem with Kate is how she looks. I think KS is really pretty and could look like Kate, but the styling for her is atrocious, regardless of any role she'd play. But especially Kate Howard. This broad looks nothing like a famous fashionista, from the hair to the makeup to the (espically!) wardrobe. Kate and Maxie's short hair is actually part of their external characterization to me, and that was my first problem with KS and then it became evident that the wardrobe department forgot how to dress the Kate character. That's what I want fixed even more than the stupid DID story, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hater Yellgado has some damn nerve throwing some shade at Alexis for being a "mouthpiece for the Mob" when her entire damn career in soapland has consisted of defending criminal vermin like her "dead" husband, Frodd.

I don't even like Alexis and wished that she verbally shanked that bipolar banshee's ass.

My Todd discussing his love for my Blair to the bootleg version of Blair just made my miss my favorite bitch with a heart so much. Because it always bears repeating - Starr's mother needs to be here to support her troubled daughter instead of that bogarting bitch that Cartini insisted on bringing over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

After years of watching various DID storylines, this is the first one that I don't get, but I'm going to ride it out and stop taking it too seriously. I'm going to also stop over-thinking the Bensonhurst gang.

I agree that Kate dresses like she shops at TJ Maxx. Her look is completely wrong, but maybe that has to do with the show's budget.

I've always liked Tea, but I get the feeling that I'm in the minority on that one. I like that she's loud and sassy. Which one did Todd hit in the face with a shovel, Tea or Blair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He punched Tea out. She hit him with the shovel.

Tea has plenty of fans and all kinds of hype. She always has. The problem is her stories are always garbage because they mostly focus on how awesome she is and how everyone else (aside from her kids and the rapists she loves) sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

lol at Heather. She is so mean to the GH nurses.

Patrick was compelling to watch this week

RH was embarrasing to watch in those Todd/Tea scenes on Thursday. I thought I had seen worse acting from him until that point!

He's been feeling guilty and having little flash memories of killing Lisa since the end of Maxie's trial.

LOL!!

GH011712.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy