Jump to content

B&B: ANOTHER star dropped to recurring


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am a fan of Lesley Anne Down, I will also be first to admit that she never quite worked as Jackie...in fact, the character itself never quite worked. I think Brad Bell was going for a younger Sally, but it never panned out because the character was one of a kind. That being said, the character was decorative, never really driving story, never really a problem.

The REAL problem, in my eyes, is Jack Wagner. HE is the albatross that has nearly killed this show. The sooner he's fired, the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well it's looking like there are two things happening:

1) LAD has another gig lined up according to her site

2) LAD is desperate enough to implore her fans to write/email/tweet Brad Bell and ask that she return on contract

This is not a wise move on the part of LAD, she's certainly not going to GH, DAYS is full, Y&R won't be taking her...all the soaps have dried up. She's 58, British and glamorous. She made an appearance at the BAFTA's a year or two ago to celebrate the anniversary of Upstairs, Downstairs and got significant press coverage. Thus, if her agent has any sense, he will tell her, if she needs to work, go to England, land a gig on EastEnders or Casualty because the UK is her absolute best shot at a career.

Stephanie Beacham did it, Joan Collins, though still on the LA scene, did it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought LAD's acting on Sunset Beach suited the character as I believe LAD herself is sort spacey, melodramatic and she has got big hair (wigs for TV)...she was my neighbour when I lived in Malibu (same street, not next door). She's a very nice lady, I just think the character was ill suited to the show. Had she been written as a straight up bitch, cut-throat, nasty, it could have worked because LAD can play it a lot straighter than she did at B&B, Jackie was just too campy and it didn't ring true.

Really, if they wanted Jackie Marone to work, they should have poached Lauren Koslow from DAYS who plays bitches with conflict and heart like nobody else in the business...though why cast her as Jackie when she could return as Margo Lynley Spencer?! Maybe she will if DAYS predeceased B&B, I have hope.

I do wish LAD well, but her career will be in the UK, not America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. She came to B&B when it was, for all intents and purposes, it's very worst. The show has been on an upward climb since 2008/2009. She was never going to last after the Spencer's became an established, well cast and well written family. I really do dream of Lauren Koslow returning as Margo, could you imagine it? Dollar Bill's former stepmother on the scene?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd love to see Margo again, especially since Mark and Clarke are still basically unresolved (even with his pointless 2002 run). I think Bill is mostly just rootless and Liam could go at any time, so they should expand that. If the show has so many useless Logans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that those Spectras should been kept, at least alive and viable. BUT Bill also has a dynamic with the Forrester which is pretty good. I was no fan of the character but Diamont and tehw riting so far have worked perfectly hand in hand. And I'm not surprised that LIam is suddenly a dud; this show never had good younger male characters to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's not saying much though.

I think Diamont's good in the role but it's the story with Steffi and Katie which gets attention. Him being a Spencer matters little and are any of the go-nowhere battles with Forrester interesting? It's always the same thing with the same result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure, it may not be saying much when we look at the failures that were Sarah Brown, Rick Hearst (Whip! sad.png ) and others. But judged on his own merit, Bill stands up as an interesting, strong, motivated male character who, thankfully, is never held up as a Paragon of Masculinity that We Must Hero-Worship (which used to happen with Ridge back in the 90s and definitely occurs on Y&R and GH today). Bill stood up to Donna and Brooke trying to blindside him back when he first showed up, and it was hilarious and satisfying to watch, for this fan at least. And then, more recently, he gets completely one-upped by his wife and that, too, was so satisfying. We never really know who is going to win when he goes toe-to-toe with Forrester.

Will he always have an adversarial role vis a vis the Forresters? Probably. Brad Bell loves repeating SLs. But right now I like the Bill Spencer dynamic because, for once, the Forresters have an adversary that matches them in terms of wealth and influence. Unlike the poor, struggling Spectras/Jackie Ms who would steal FC designs, then they'd have a head-to-head fashion contest to see who was better and Ridge would always win with his 1980s tackfest. Snore.

As for LAD, I loved her as Olivia on SuBe. She was "spacey and melodramatic" because she was a drunk, emotional headcase who couldn't live without her cold, controlling husband (truly SuBe was a lot better and more enjoyable than people give it credit for at the time). I feel bad that LAD lost her job at B&B but the Spectras have been decimated and Jackie M wasn't quite fitting the bill. When Stephanie and Whip joined the company, I had hope, but that soon fizzled. IA with DF that Jack Wagner needs to be let go, like, yesterday. Nick hasn't had a pairing that works since his first year on the show. This one with Donna is certainly not doing anything for me (and while we are at it, do we really need Donna around, too?).

And at the risk of being attacked because I know there are a lot of Macy fans on the show, I don't want Macy or Bobbie Eakes to come back. Liked her at the time but honestly do not think about her anymore. I would much rather Bell write for his existing cast (including Justin, Thorne and Felicia).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy