Jump to content

Billboard's #1 Pop Singles


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here are two other songs called "Cara Mia":

First we have Spanish disco duo Baccara, most famous for the 1977 smash hit "Yes Sir, I Can Boogie"

Please register in order to view this content

Then we have Swedish singer Måns Zelmerlöw from Melodifestivalen (the Swedish qualification for the Eurovision Song Contest) 2007. He ended up in 3rd place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 891
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think "Ferry Cross The Mersey" should have reached #1, and definitely "The Tracks of My Tears". Here's a wonderful (in my opinion anyway) version of the latter, by Jamaican-born singer Ruby Turner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWI3C1w0de8

It appeared on her 1988 album "The Motown Songbook" where she sang classics from Motown. It's a great album, with guest performances by among others The Four Tops and The Temptations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You have such an optimistic way at looking at things, Alphanguy! Thank you so much for these wonderful end-of-year recaps. (And thank you for Part II, I Am A Swede.)

Here are the songs of 1965 I felt were most deserving of #1 status (not all of which appeared on the recap):

Cara Mia - Jay & the Americans (#4) [i agree that this song is absolute perfection.]

Down in the Boondocks - Billy Joe Royal (#9)

Do You Believe in Magic - The Lovin' Spoonful (#9)

Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me - Mel Carter (#8)

In the Midnight Hour - Wilson Pickett (#21)

It Ain't Me Babe - The Turtles (#8)

Keep on Dancing - The Gentrys (#4)

The Tracks of My Tears - The Miracles (#16) [This is definitely one of this group's best songs.]

Unchained Melody - The Righteous Brothers (#4)

You're the One - The Vogues (#4)

MissLlanviewPA, I apologize for waiting so long to respond to you. I should tell you that I absolutely despise "Dominique," though. However, thank you for sharing that commercial that featured "Big Girls Don't Cry." I certainly remember that commercial, but for some reason, I mistakenly thought the song was used in a Johnson & Johnson Shampoo ad instead of one for Pert Plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This slipped my mind, but I also forgot to mention "You've Got Your Troubles" by the Fortunes (which peaked at #7) among the 1965 songs that should have peaked at #1.

I never knew that about Bo Donaldson and the Heywoods.

There were twenty-seven #1 hits in 1966. The first of these songs was "The Sounds of Silence" by Simon & Garfunkel, which spent two non-consecutive weeks at the top spot: the weeks ended 1/1/66 & 1/22/66.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6YSh1-XuUKE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Paul Simon (born 11/5/42 in Newark) and Art Garfunkel (born 10/13/42 in Queens) first met each other when they were in a 6th grade play at a Queens school. In 1957, they recorded as Tom & Jerry (Art was "Tom" and Paul was "Jerry") and charted in "Billboard" with the #49 "Hey, Schoolgirl" (an Everly Brothers-inspired tune). At one time, it looked like the duo was going to build upon this success, as they soon made an appearance on "American Bandstand." Unfortunately, subsequent efforts flopped, and Simon & Garfunkel had difficulty staying in touch during their college years (as they went their separate ways).

As the early-60s drew to a close, the two men's interests began to shift to folk music. Shortly after JFK's assassination, Simon wrote "The Sounds of Silence," and the duo recorded the song on March 10, 1964. Yet, because this record also flopped upon initial release, the duo decided to split up (having failed to make the top 40 even once).

In the summer of 1965, a Boston radio station played "The Sounds of Silence," and it became a popular local hit. Right after Bob Dylan recorded "Like a Rolling Stone," producer Tom Wilson decided to overdub the original 1964 recording of "Silence" with "electric guitar, bass, and drums." The fact that this new version of the tune peaked at #1 came as a complete surprise to Paul and Art, as they were not even consulted about the changes Wilson had made to their song. Though both men strongly disapproved of the changes Wilson made, they soon reunited and cut more tunes in the same folk rock vein. Over a dozen top 40 hits would follow, including two more number ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like it myself... it's one of my favorites of theirs. But then again, I like ponderous. I will say that I like another version of it much BETTER... and that was the version by Peaches and Herb from 1971. It barely squeaked into the Billboard charts at Number 100. But it's GOOD.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Though I like some of Simon & Garfunkel's songs (and quite a few of Simon's solo hits), I find "The Sounds of Silence" and "Bridge Over Troubled Water" to be way too depressing.

The first of two Beatles records to top the Hot 100 in 1966 was "We Can Work It Out," which spent three weeks at number one (not all of which were consecutive): the weeks ended 1/8/66, 1/15/66, & 1/29/66.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZNfuTDbdKoY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I mentioned earlier that despite sharing songwriting credit, John Lennon and Paul McCartney usually penned tunes separately. However, occasionally one of the two men would write a song and go to the other for guidance; such was the case with "We Can Work It Out." Paul had written most of the lyrics and music for the record when he asked John for his advice. Lennon's response was to write a more sobering bridge to contrast with the hopeful message McCartney was relaying. As Lennon stated in a 1980 interview to "Playboy": "But you've got Paul writing, 'We can work it out/We can work it out' -- real optimistic, y'know, and me, impatient: 'Life is very short and there's no time/For fussing and fighting, my friend...'"

The flip side of "We Can Work It Out" was "Day Tripper." It peaked at #5 in America. Across the Atlantic, however, the song's popularity was on par with "We Can Work It Out," and the result was a double-sided British chart-topper (the group's ninth in their home country).

Before the Beatles were to top the American charts again, John Lennon uttered his most infamous comments. On March 4, 1966, the Beatle was interviewed by Maureen Cleave of the "Evening Standard" (a British newspaper). (She was interviewing each Beatle individually for a series titled "How Does a Beatle Live?") Cleave had noticed a large number of books written by intellectuals on John's bookshelf, which got the conversation centered on Christianity. Lennon told Cleave that "Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that. I'm right and I will be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now. I don't know which will go first--rock 'n' roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me."

Surprisingly, these comments did not cause any backlash in Britain. It was not until late July when the American magazine "Datebook" printed them that fans in the United States became aware of these highly offensive comments. Some radio stations (mostly in the South) banned Beatles music in response, and a small number of bonfires were organized where teens could burn their Beatles merchandise. (Negative reaction wasn't just limited to the United States: there were public protests against the Beatles in Mexico City, and several radio stations in Spain and South Africa also decided to ban the band's music.)

I know that a lot of folks probably have their own views regarding Lennon's Jesus comments. While I certianly respect those who disagree with my view that Lennon's comments were "highly offensive," as well as those who believe that the reaction to them was overly harsh, I can only imagine the huge s#itstorm that would result if Adele were to ever state "I'm more popular than Muhammad now" (as well as the massive number of death threats that would come her way).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That Petula Clark version is, once again, a slowed down shmaltzed up version turning an upbeat song into a mopey dirge. I think time has rendered a verdict on the Beatles and they were not found lacking. Were their superior voices? Absolutely. Did every superior voice cut a superior recording of their song? Not from the citations offered in this thread as far as I can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For some reason, I just feel that "We Can Work It Out" is a song that the lyrics lend itself better to a slower pace. I know I dump on the Beatles alot, but it's only from a vocal and production standpoint. Ironically, I think they ALL sounded way better in their solo records from the 70's.. all FOUR of them. And I enjoyed the productions much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Someone posted years ago that they remember Pamela Peters (Peggy) was having some sort of issues behind the scenes during the rape storyline and barely participated onscreen when it played out. Trish Stewart (Chris) seemed to carry most of the storyline along with Dick DeCoit (Ron) and David Hasselhoff (Snapper). I think the poster also mentioned that Anthony Hererra (Jack) said that Pamela Peters one day looked into the camera and exclaimed she didn't know what she was doing and walked out of the scene.  
    • Yes! I'm not at your point of not rooting for the Duprees, but they really need to tone down the self-righteousness. Some of the things coming out of these ladies' mouths is out of pocket considering all the skeletons in their own family's closet. 
    • Kat is still a privileged elitist. She hated Eva on sight because Eva didn’t bow her head to her immediately and continued to treat Eva like a stain on her overpriced shoes. I’d love to know if Laura kissed her ass and kissed the ring properly and knew her place below Kat in the general hierarchy.    While Eva has been deserving of most of the consequences she’s been reaping, the Dupree women can take several hundred seats with the way they behave towards others. The hypocrisy and posturing irks me more than anything else and it’s the same thing that irks me about all other prominent soap families who can do no wrong in their own eyes.   I’m not really rooting for any of these assholes except maybe Eva (who is by default the smallest [&#33;@#&#036;%^&amp;*] on this show), but I’m rooting against the Dupree family (except Nicole - she’s awesome) in general and I’m not sure that’s the goal of the showrunners.
    • Kristian probably had a high 'Q' score-that seemed to mean a lot in those days. FC always brought unknowns in for the young cast, so her Days probably had little to do with it-just something that they thought might help. The producers probably had no idea who she was, but that 'Q' score would have been a factor. Otherwise she was just a pretty, competent actress as Ana Alicia, Mary Kate McGeehan, Kate Vernon etc had been.
    • Finally caught up. I was really torn by Friday's episode. Naomi and Jacob were way too invested on who performed this surgery on June being she's someone they barely know. Also, this is a hospital in the DMV, a densely populated area with well-staffed hospitals. There's only one qualified doctor in all of the DMV? Oh no, not that doctor! Only Dr. McBride will do? It was strange.  Can we stop making the Casino a meeting point. First, Eva and Mona crossing paths and now Dani/Pamela/Doug/Joey. These folks don't seem like they just hit up the casino on a random Tuesday. Especially, one that is supposed to be some shady, seedy backroom. They need to end this casino stuff and repurpose that set. Ted and Dana read sooooo differently this episode. Why was Ted out here inviting this woman that just blew up his life, clearly is unhinged, and took 50k to a birthday dinner???? Did I miss something? His reaction towards Dana also did not seem angry or in disgust like the previous Ted. It didn't feel right. Whatever Bill was doing with his eyes when at OG's with Smitty.  The Good: Anita getting some story is great. Love to have her doing more.  Leslie is wild. She really just had Eva to hold onto Ted-ddy. Calling her daughter a whole souvenir and not giving 2 about her birthday. Although, I'm wondering if Eva's real birthday is actually earlier and that's why Dana/Lesile is so nonchalant about this date. She gave Eva a cupcake some time back and I'm wondering if that's to tie to this idea that Kat and Eva are twins.  Smitty is growing on me. He's got something to do.  I didn't love some bigger things in this episode, but there were some small things that really were so nice to see. Loved seeing Dani calling Doug over to join them. It really gave off this feeling that they know each other well and it was a bit playful like you would do with a friend. Similarly, I liked how Kat and Naomi and Jacob played off each other. "I was actually asking my hubsand." It gave off authentic family banter vibes. 
    • Jane Wyman had health struggles and was written out after the first few episodes. IIRC, she went against medical advice to film the final episodes of the show. I guess they likely did think Alicia was just there as some kind of eye candy for viewers and could be replaced. As mentioned by several people in the CBS primetime soap threads, Moonves and others brought a real culture of misogyny to the shows in the mid/late '80s where every woman was seen as replaceable. I didn't realize how many times Wyman's health had been a factor in the last 4-5 seasons of the show. Here is one example. www.falconcrest.org | Deutscher FALCON CREST - Fanclub / German FALCON CREST Fan Club
    • Was Angela still on the show at that point? I think I caught some of the show on Lifetime or TNT  when they reran the series, and Angela never seemed to be on during the last season. I remember thinking it felt the like the last season was a completely different show and that Wendy Philips was too grounded of an actress (not a criticism) for a nighttime soap.    I don't understand the concept because I don't think most people channel hop. I can understand wanting Alfonso's popularity to rub off, but why engender bad feelings by firing Ana Alicia and bringing on Alfonso? Soap execs never learned that lesson. Like Ellen Parker a few years later, I don't think they realized Ana Alicia's popularity.
    • I think they tended to run the cast list once a week, but I don't know if it had a consistent day.
    • Does Search for Tomorrow ever list the cast in its end credits? I watched about fifteen videos from 1985 to look at the cast credits at the end and I never saw any except for Mary Stuart's credit. I try not to google cast members if there's a chance I might watch a soap so I don't spoil exits.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy