Jump to content

AMC: A Little Bit on the Original Ending


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is from SOD but I think SOW may have more because it's an all-AMC cover.

Anyways:

-For those that watched the show, they liken the original AMC finale to the finale of the show "Six Feet Under" (never watched that show so I don't know how useful that is)

-It was a "beautiful" and "heartwarming" glimpse into the future of the characters, a few years down the road

-SOD does not say who they're talking about but I think it's obvious: Someone who returned during the summer pre-taped material to be included in this future stuff, and so it had to go unused. So Leo at ConFusion in a suit wasn't just a meaningless promo shot. Such a shame given that Rebecca Budig most likely isn't continuing on with the show.

Not from SOD, just my own ramblings: Jennifer Bassey said at the fan club weekend that she was originally invited to be in the finale, so I think part of what we would have seen was Marian, out of Oakhaven and happy with Stuart. I still bet we'll get an alive Stuart, but I would have loved to see Stuart and Marian together one more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The SFU finale which I and many others consider one of the best finales ever, ended with a long musical montage that shows brief silent glimpses into the future of all the characters--specifically the moment they died. It was extremely powerful and moving, at least for most fans.

I doubt AMC would have shown the deaths of all these characters (SFU of course was built around death as a theme--always opening with a random death, so it made sense for that show), but that does have me intrigued. Interesting though this doesn't seem to jie all that well with the comments from Agnes that things wouldn't be all tied up with a pretty bow--then again maybe it doesn't as these glimpses into the future didn't have to all be heartwarming or final.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont know that she ever said anything would or wouldn't be wrapped up in a bow she just talked about leaving things at a point where viewers would get the sense that the lives of the people of Pine Valley were not ending but continuing forward. It could have meant pairing people off with some subtle possible glimpses forward like the picture of Leo you mentioned. I have to admit I think I would have liked this better than I fear where they are going.

I thought the ending of SFU was phenomenal. At times I found it could be a hard show to watch but definitely worth the investment of time and money of you are looking for the DVD set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some people really never took to it (meaning it seems to sharply divide people), but even in its weaker years it was one of my favorite shows (and Alan Ball said several times he considered it a soap opera and hated that some critics seemed insulted when i ws called that--mentiuoning his influences growing up with soaps and then later watching Knots).

Yes, I'm not sure how it would work for a long running daytime soap--even though I doubt AMC was going to fill theirs, if it was indeed similar, with death scenes--as opposed to a show that finally was coming to a closed ending with no chance of ever returning in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWdYMuo3_B4

This was the Six Feet Under finale using the now much used but completely evocative Breathe Me by Sia. It's a pretty great ending and it wrapped up the entire series perfectly. I did watch the show but I tend to think it was overrated. It was great for it's character introspection and respective character arcs but as an entire series I never thought it worked cohesively enough to yield a strong narrative for all of the characters. The ensemble cast just didn't gel enough in my opinion to really feel like a family and the interactions suffered as a result. All of the characters worked better in their own separate spheres more so then they worked with one another.

It's unfortunate that Prospect forced them to change it and may now not even pick up AMC because so many actors have jumped ship on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the show struck a great balance in the first two seasons - damaged but believable people you cared about, and a sense of family. After the second season the show wasn't the same. I don't blame Lisa, as I think an HBO exec did, I mostly blame a lot of nasty and meandering stories (especially for David, Claire, and Brenda - the show did a real number on the first two in particular). I thought they put it back together at the end. I also thought it was very brave to kill off the loathsome Nate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never watched SFU, but a friend of mine directed me to the finale, or the final moments of the series finale, about a year ago when I was theorizing on how Smallville was going to end this past May. Having not watched a single moment of SFU, but seeing the last five minutes, I was actually moved to tears. It was phenomenal. If AMC would have gone that route, and done even half a good of job, it would have a finale to remember, PP or no PP.

The more and more I see, of the AMC cast either not signing on to PP, or moving to other shows, it concerns me that we're going to have a great big over the top cliffhanger, and absolutely no resolution, because PP will just let AMC die out and sit in their shelves for maybe syndication reruns in some distant future.

I suppose they actually could have done both, appease PP, and still give the ending they wanted. Have a flash forward to what life could have been like in Pine Valley in years to come, but end it with a lives in the balance cliffhanger as well. A choose your own adventure if you will. That way there's closure if the show doesn't continue, but suspense for if/when it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought the individual characters and stories were interesting. Claire, Nate, David, Brenda, etc. they all had great interactions and stories when they delved into their own lives. I just never felt they worked as a familial unit. I think each of the characters had great individual arcs though. If the show had found a way for them to interact with one another realistically speaking I think it could have worked better but I felt none of the shows leads had familial chemistry and it all just felt so detached and sterile when they did see each other.

I agree they could have done what Scrubs did in season 8. Have the characters day dream what their life would be like in a few years and then leave it open ended to the audience on whether or not it actually happened or if it was just a hopeful dream.

Please register in order to view this content

I think that could have definitely worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't disagree but I think after watching the past couple of weeks I am going to really hope they don't do something overly campy and dramatic. I realize you've been disappointed in LB's writing and I have been kind of at a loss at the Project Orpheus story, but in retrospect aside from that I think she's done a pretty decent job with the rest, the best she could have under the circumstances I think. I can't understand why they scrapped the original concept until I actually see the final product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Charles Grant first appeared as Evan in September 1988. I was surprised to come across this item from December 1985, almost 3 years earlier: "Lots of action behind the scenes at Another World . . . I have bad news for fans of Christopher Holder (Peter Love). He will be leaving the show in the new year. I have heard that the producers are recasting the part and are also seeing actors for new roles. One of the main characters this spring will be Marlee [sic] and Victoria's father. The producers have been talking to Charles Flohe (John "Preacher" Emerson, Edge Of Night) about another new character to be featured. I will fill you in on the results as soon as I know." It seems obviously too early for anyone to have been planning to introduce Evan Frame. Based on the context he's not being considered as a recast of Peter. Maybe they were considering him for the character that turned out to be Neal, who started around the same time as Marcus Smythe as Peter?
    • Randall Edwards (and Brian Tarantina), with the opening night cast of 1985's Biloxi Blues, plus director Gene Saks and playwright Neil Simon.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy