Jump to content

The NFL Thread


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The NFL, and especially Roger Goodell, is like low hanging fruit and it's become safe for those who constantly must've been holding their noses to swoop in and point out the stench. I've heard over and over again how it's a microcosm or reflection of society and I'm inclined to disagree. It exists because there is extreme entertainment value and a lot of money to be made for a select group. The players may be people too but I don't know of any "regular" jobs in which the employer would knowingly hire guys with drug issues, rapists, and other criminals by reasoning that their talent trumps their "extracurricular activiies."

ESPN hired Ray Lewis. Do they care about the families who lost their loved ones to murder and his possible involvement (or at the very least his obsruction of justice) and how it must feel to see him on their staff? Or do they brush that off because he made a financial settlement with them? They certainly don't care about having him commenting on either Ray Rice or Adrian Peterson.

While I understand that Hannah Storm is not ESPN, I still can't feel much for her asking what the NFL stands for when she should ask the same of her employers. The NFL and applicable owners have been hiding behind "due process" as justification for their inaction and ESPN is probably hiding behind "giving you the public what you want," though I doubt a bunch of people asked for the analysis of Ray Lewis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm not saying this to be controversial but I honestly don't understand why the NFL is being targeted for this and why Morning Joe and the Media at large is so hell bent on destroying the League and the possibility of enjoying football season this year. I don't support or condone domestic violence but this situation isn't as clear cut black and white as some would like to make it seem. And I don't think Roger Goodell should be fired.

Bottom line though is that the ratings speak for themselves. The fans speak for themselves. They're the ones showing up to the games and still watching. And from what I've seen there are still women wearing Ray Rice jerseys and plenty of people on the Russ Parr Morning Show defending Adrian Peterson's actions towards that poor son of his.

In short this is just another storm that will eventually pass on. Happens with every shooting rampage this country experiences. It happens with almost every so called "scandal". A lot of uproar and indignation but it all eventually dies out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Roger Goodell should be fired either. He works for a bunch of owners, some of whom knowingly hire criminals to play for their teams. I don't see how a player's behavior is his fault. Teams have the ability to discipline players if they want and those who don't use him as a scapegoat (which is part of the reason they pay him $44 million a year besides his increasing their profits).

Maybe some of the people who flat out hate the NFL want to see it destroyed, but I don't think everyone who is complaining wants that. I'm sure there are a wide range of reasons including those who want to feel better about watching and cheering for a team, even if it's merely cosmetic. The video and pictures present a moral dilemma for some and even when this blows over, the dilemma is still going to exist and will resurface if some other "in your face" images are brought to light.

Since TMZ has jumped into the sports arena, I find it hard to believe that they are not going to make a practice of digging up dirt to spring on the NFL at opportune spotlight moments. They released that video on opening weekend for the attention and managed to turn a day of football into mentions for TMZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If the investigation that is being conducted, Ray Rice's appeal, and/or other evidence reveals that Roger Goodell lied about what he knew prior to issuing Ray Rice's suspension, he will more than likely step down or be fired. I cannot see how he or the owners would be able to get around something like that without removing him.

Outside of that, I don't see why he should be fired to appease people who didn't seem to care that much about the practices of the NFL when it comes to punishment (except when it impacts their gambling including Fantasy Football). I don't know the extent to which the owner of the Ravens influenced the length of the suspension. The spotlight is on Roger Goodell but I don't see any group demanding anyone from the Ravens be fired. They are the ones who quickly got behind Ray Rice and put out statements about the events. They also held that press conference in which they trotted out his wife to show all is well. If the fruit on the tree is rotten then they're at the root of that mess.

And the owner of the Carolina Panthers cried freely while still planning to play someone who was already convicted, by acting as though he had no choice. Then lo and behold they deactivated him for a game. Then they let him return and were hiding behind "due process" until "due process" became a leave because of the external pressure.

So far the "zero tolerance" 49ers haven't been shamed into deactivating, suspending or sitting the player they have who is accused of domestic violence against his pregnant fiancee.

The only owner anyone seems to be willing to complain about is Dan Snyder over the Redskins. All the Hugh Hefner wannabes skate and the crocodile tears seem sufficient from the owners who want to do the right thing but cannot because of "due process" because they are paying those guys millions and why should domestic issues cost them? Roger Goodell might ultimately need to go but I don't think that little band aid takes care of anything until those owners are made accountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • Administrator

Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a crazy ending!!!! I couldn't believe that insane catch by Seattle....I couldn't believe it was happening again (helmet catch and sideline catch). Then a miracle happened....Seattle decided to throw from the one yard line??!! What??!! Interception!!!! Yes!!!!! That was one of the best Super Bowl ever. I laugh at Sherman who was talking smack about Revis with his "two" "four" to the camera after Seattle's last TD. Hey Sherman, you mad bro??!!!

And congrats to (in a Denzel Washington voice) "my man," Tom Brady on his fourth ring and 3rd Super Bowl MVP. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

People are just trying to come up with reasons why they decided to throw instead of running. I highly doubt the coaches were thinking about MVPs on that situation. It was just a terrible play call, the worst in Super Bowl history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think that worked, but not as much by the late '80s, where I think they started getting things wrong with Mack.  I do respect Kevin Dobson, who did well when he was given the material he deserved (like the story with Jason).
    • 1976 Pt 2 The Organization has retained Michael Selby to represent their hit men. The district attorney recognizes his opponent as a noted courtroom specialist and knows he has his work cut out for him. Raising technicality after technicality, Selby quickly eliminates Lieutenant Price’s testimony implicating Bailey and Jerry’s testimony about Heather’s being assaulted. ‘Then, after cutting Julian’s testimony out as common knowledge, Selby goes straight to the heart of the  prosecution’s case. He demands that Carrie be produced now, sure that she’s been taken by the Organization. To Selby’s horror and shock, the doors open and Carrie walks in, and the courtroom explodes into pandemonium. As soon as the judge can restore order, Carrie is sworn in and begins her testimony. When court recesses for the day, Steve is confronted by another Organization man, Franklin, who questions him about why he took Carrie away. Steve tells him that Carrie was so frightened by the hit man lurking around that he saw his opportunity to be alone with her and “score.” Steve then adds that she wasn’t at all cooperative or friendly—she just cried all the  time—so he dumped her. He insists he has no idea how the police got her after that. Franklin accepts his story, and Steve learns that his next test is to testify to just what he’s told Franklin, omitting, of course, the reference to the hit man. Carrie insists upon a meeting with Steve and begs him not to go underground. He tells her he can’t back out now; you can’t go through life letting somebody  else do it all the time. Steve takes this opportunity to inform Lieutenant Price that he has to dump on Carrie on the witness stand for the Organization, but he can’t stop now. Julian, irate that Selby has blocked any reference to Nurse Fellowes’s disappearance and murder, as she was the only witness who could corroborate Carrie’s testimony, confronts Selby on this evasion. Selby | coldly tells Julian that there is no concrete connection between the nurses’ death and anything else that’s happened in this case and that to bring it into this trial would be a miscarriage of law. Julian, realizing  that it all falls on Carrie’s shoulders now, warns her that Selby will be out for blood; he has to make the court believe she’s lying.  The next day the district attorney introduces Carrie’s tape recorder. The tape, burned, as is the recorder, is barely audible. Selby calls for a mistrial, claiming that his clients’ reputations have been damaged enough. As the judge calls a recess: to consider the motion before the bench, the district attorney admits that he predicted everything Selby would do to this point, but had not guessed about this motion. If it works and there’s a new trial, Carrie is in far greater danger.  Steve now tells Castor that either he’s working for  the Organization as of now or he’s going to look elsewhere for a job. Castor offers the rainy weather as an excuse to wait before contacting “him,” because “the iron in him’Il be driving him crazy.” Realizing that this is a lead, Steve starts to write it down. When he is nearly caught, he warns himself that from now on  everything he learns will have to be kept in his head.  As soon as possible, he passes the “iron” clue along to Julian. The district attorney gains a respite when the judge  turns down the mistrial motion, but the tape has been disallowed also, ruled inadmissible. So it’s Selby’s turn to cross-examine Carrie. When he forces her to admit that she never actually saw the hit man, Selby turns to the jury and informs them that this proves she’s been lying. He then suggests this has all been a plot to boost the circulation of the newspaper she works for. Selby then goes to work on Carrie’s personal morals. Since she’s admitted that she and Steve spent three days in the apartment, alone together, he asks questions and makes insinuations designed to make the jury believe this was actually a sleazy affair. To Carrie’s horror, he then calls the landlady, Mrs. Wilson who testifies that that Steve and Carrie,registered as Mr. and Mrs. Clark, spent the three days in question drinking and partying with loud music and assorted other sounds coming from their rooms until late each night. Carrie rises to her feet and screams at Mrs. Wilson, ““You’re lying!” Steve is served with a subpena.  Joe Castor visits “the man”: Fred Harrington! Castor gives Harrington his report on Steve. He thinks Steve, with his computerlike mind, could be invaluable in helping the Organization work out money-exchange problems. Harrington tells Castor he wants the trial over as soon as possible, no matter how it goes. Those men are expendable; he has a bigger problem: Julian.
    • Given the weird fantasies/out of town barn trips she does for Reva/Kyle, I can't see it either. (Not to mention Kyle's obsessive talking to paintings, or Billy's nightmares.)
    • She would be great, but I of course am thinking of her in What's Love Got to Do with It.
    • Agreed that they had a home in the present tense of the first set of episodes.  But I was wondering if they lived in the mansion in the past when Sophia disappeared, and moved out when Santana got pregnant?  Or even when Danny was born.
    • According to the French Santa Barbara site the Andrades had a house in the early episodes.  I thought I remembered scenes in their home. The Andrade house
    • I always wondered if the Andrades lived at the Capwell Mansion?  Certainly they could've had a living room in their space or wherever they went on days off. But, I felt like it was never clear whether Santana visited Rosa when Kelly and Eden were young, or if she actually lived in the servant's quarters (one hopes modern developers have found a euphemism for that space).  I always imagined that Rosa, Santana, and Reuben lived with CC up until Channing was murdered, and then they found their own place because the kids were mostly over 18 (and Santana was pregnant). I like the idea of Rueban and CC being close until Santana got pregnant.  And then Reuben would've hated the adoption of Brandon.  Which would have meant he hated CC, and would've only continued to work for him to try to get info on whatever happened to his grandson. With regard Ava Lazar, having recently rewatched the pilot for the millionth time, I find her captivating to watch, but her line delivery is so dull. She looks amazing, and I just want her to be more quick witted.
    • I liked the original 4 family set up.  The families were all different from each other and were intertwined.  They should have been given equal airtime. I felt that Lockridges were perfectly cast with the exception of Laken.  She should have been quickly recast.   I liked all 4 of the actors cast as the Andrades and wish they would have been given better writing.  I really thought Ava Lazar (Santana) would have been one of the breakout stars if she had not been replaced. My only issue with the casting of the Perkins family was Robert Alan Browne as John and as much as I liked Mark Arnold he was the wrong actor to recast Joe Perkins. And of course it was ridiculous how badly they screwed up the casting of CC. The other Capwells were well cast.
    • This late 1976 stuff doesn't sound as bad as it has in other versions I've read (weekly recaps from Jon-Michael Reed and SOD synopses). I am surprised that there is a variation of Ian - Meg - Arlene - Tom playing out this late in the game, but it doesn't sound half bad. Ian's involvement with Beaver Ridge and how it impacts Rick and Cal's future also intrigued me  more than I expected. Even the Carrie - Betsy connection having Carrie watch Suzanne while Ben is visiting was a nice surprise. I feel like this all falls apart pretty quickly with the arrival of Mia Marriott, Michael Blake, and a slew of other half baked characters under Upton.  
    • Too bad she ended up on Y&R. Actress Valarie Pettiford might've been "Sharon" because she sings too and does it pretty well.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy