Jump to content

AMC - Friday - August 26, 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

True. AMC hasn't been AMC for a very long time. Still, with the arguable exception of GUIDING LIGHT, most canceled soaps manage to pull it together enough in their final weeks to give viewers a pleasant, if not altogether satisfying, goodbye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not trying to make excuses but I still blame/credit Prospect Park for a lot of what's happened with AMC. The show can't say a proper goodbye when the new bosses don't want to say goodbye at all.

I've seen the complaint that AMC hasn't been AMC or that the show has been unrecognizable for years and honestly I don't know what people mean by that. I'm not saying it's been good but I don't get what people mean by "unrecognizable." Not that it matters anymore.

I'm sorry the show has chosen to go out by doubling down on the viewer-repelling Rylee and Zendall and revisiting the noxious toxin that is Babe but they all helped kill this show so I guess it's only fitting that they get to dance on the grave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I won't presume to speak for all AMC fans. However, when I say the show isn't recognizable anymore, what I mean is, it no longer possesses that which put it on the map to begin with. When I was a kid, one thing I loved a lot about AMC was just how "small town" it felt. Pine Valley truly was the sort of place where everybody knew each other, where the things that happened in their neighborhoods seemed to be like the things that could happen in our own (no "mad scientists" bringin' everybody and their cousin back from the dead), and where folks actually had warm and intimate conversations and didn't just rattle off plot points. But now...? Now, there aren't any more great comic characters like Langley, Phoebe, and Myrtle; there aren't any more provocative, ripped-from-the-headlines stories about topical issues (or what stories there have been in the last 5-10 years have subpar and not befitting AMC's legacy in that department); and there haven't been any heartbreaking tales of young love, which I consider AMC's real hallmark, for a very long time. And that makes me...very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the entire show suffered once the baby switch ended. From that point forward after that umbrella storyline ended it was like the entire show was divided into spheres. Orbits were created which some how wound up with everyone being in a vacuum. This may not sound horrible in theory but the major problem was that it was borderline impossible for characters to break out of them and they could never intersect with other characters regularly to get some air so to speak.

There was the Chandler/Martin orbit, then there was the Kane/Lavery orbit, then there was everything else which usually meant that you were in someway back burnered if you weren't in one of those two worlds. That decay ate away at the show because there was no interweaving of story lines and the entire community broke down. You didn't even live in a town any more you just lived in a lop-sided show, it was like the show was cut in half with random scenes sprinkled in it. This problem persists to this very day. The show doesn't feel like a community where anyone can and does in some way interact and intersect with each other in some form. You can look at the way they are writing Slavery, Minx, The Hubbards and JR's clan they all stick to themselves and rarely if ever break out of their pairings/circles. David is the only one who sees everyone who's on the show. Has Maya even had a scene outside of Angie and Jesse since she left the Chandler mansion?

There are still problems like this today which persist. There are no real ties to everyone within the PV community and characters are stuck with interacting with the same characters over and over again and it has gotten to be incredibly stale. Back in the late 90's there was a sense that everyone could interact with everyone on the canvas. That is one of the reasons why I hated the Slavery pairings because it's like they didn't exist outside each other and their relationship was so parasitic and irrationally co-dependent on their friendships and relationships. It was so stifling and cyclical you could time your watch by it. Often times it would consist of the same conversations over and over again. It was like they chewed each others story only to feed it back to one another.

Of course there were other problems as well. The show's inability to find a story that viewers really, honestly wanted to invest in after Bianca got her baby back tore apart this show like a gaping hole. Eden's departure left this show without a center specifically because Megan wrote up the Kanes so much in 2003 and pretty much road Bianca to the ground until Eden left. The Lavery focus wasn't the way the show should have gone in 2005, neither was the hybrid Babe/Zendell hour in 2006, nor was the problem rectified in 2007 and onward with endless Slavery action that was amplified with Greenlee's return and departures. I think the Hubbards could have turned things around but that didn't really stick either it seemed or at least not for long. The show was just so bad at that point that I don't think anything could have saved it. It was a steep drop from 2008 onward. This show just had nothing to offer after 2005 I feel and that's why viewers left. These last six years really killed the show because no writer could find a resolution. There was no sense of over arching direction or leadership, which obviously didn't help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay I get that and you're right that the show has definitely lost a lot of its personality.I guess when I hear "unrecognizable" I think of GH where somewhere along the line a conscious decision was made to completely change what the show was about. I don't think that's happened to AMC. I've seen comments that AMC deserved to be canceled because it was "too far gone" and I've never agreed with that. It's was badly damaged by whiplash writing regimes and, of course, Fronsian interference but the people who say it was beyond hope tend to be coming from a viewpoint that...let's just say I've always had a problem with.

All that said, the fact that the show is going to end with this sickening sci-fi plot and these rancid, stale pairings borders on creative malpractice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the issue with AMC Is the issue with all of the ABC soaps. They just in many ways became carbon copies of one another. The things that made each show special and unique has disappeared. The shows are vapid and more vanilla than ever. Characters like Myrtle. Langley, and Opal in many ways dont even belong on an ABC soap anymore. I used to get pissed off about AMC as I still do about GH but I think it took the unabortion storyline that was the turning point for me. Now I watch the end of the show and I can joke and snark about it and I don't really care anymore.

I can't blame all this on PP. ALl these people were scheduled to return as it was before PP was announced so broderick came up with some convoluted story to explain it. Project Orpheus is not PP or at least not all PP. And with Zach, Dixie returning, Rylee still around, Brodericks love for villians and all things David its not hard to believe the show would have been as sufficating as it has been PP or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the baby switch story is a perfect example of what went wrong. It reminds me a lot of the baby switch story on days in recent years where people praised it to no end. The story itself might have been compelling and must see TV for a time but AMC same as Days never used the stories to propel and move stories and the characters in new and interesting directions as someone in another thread pointed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only began watching AMC regularly in November 2007 so the AMC you guys speak of I am not too familiar with. I did catch standout episodes of the show through the years but again I wasn't a fan until 2007. We still have a few weeks left so maybe we will see more of the AMC you guys are looking for. But I am enjoying the Mad Scientist David story. Should it end the shows ABC run that I'm not too sure. But we'll have to wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its always interesting reading how newer viewers see the show. I am not even sure any of the soaps are really as bad as you read here. Even with as "bad" as AMC, Y&R, Days, GH, OLTL, B&B are or have been there are still millions of people who continue to watch. ER was a show for example I loved and it clearly lost direction its last few years and started relying on gimics more and more. But I don't know even if it continued on its current path if it would have maintained its audience. The freshnes loses steam and people lose interest. And even with the return to what it had been in its last year it was never able to recapture the audience and the essense of what it was in its early years. Soaps have been losing audience for years and whether folks recognize it or not they were losing audience even during the alleged glory years. Its possible that the AMC some of us crave for might be a show you wouldn't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, Skin, that is the consequence of how soaps are taped today. Budget cuts and block-taping of scenes have wreaked havoc on writers' ability to weave disparate stories together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think so either, marceline. Granted, AMC has lost its' charm. As I've said before on numerous occasions, Pine Valley has become too cosmopolitan; frankly, I doubt the move to PP will restore its quaintness, for lack of a better word. However, in creating AMC, Agnes Nixon set out to tell the story of a town. A town filled with some quirky, larger-than-life character, yes. But also, a town with "ordinary people" facing the same everyday problems you and I face. If the writers cut out all the b.s. and get back to that, regardless of who stays and who doesn't, it will be a step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy