Jump to content

August 15-19, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have a feeling OLTL is going to do a Victor/Todd murder mystery, which may keep ratings high through the fall.

(And about your other comment....total viewers and households mean nothing to networks or advertisers. In the only thing that matters, OLTL continued to climb.....That said, I don't watch the show anymore, anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL will definitely fall next week due to the pre-emptions. When NYC's 0.0 demo rating (along with other big east coast cities 0.0 demo ratings) is factored in, OLTL will drop, no way around it.

Yep, dead last, and unlikely to be renewed past its November 2013 contract expiration.

I think they're just not educated about ratings. They don't know enough about them to know that Households/TotalViewers don't matter. Advertisers don't buy based on viewers; they buy based on WHO is watching. Some soap fans just don't understand that, or know about that, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're sweet C, but I don't think that's it.

Anyway, I agree I think OLTL will go down next week. Was watching my DVR and we got interrupted here in NYC again because of the impending storm. It doesn't really matter. It's been doing pretty decently for months now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. I really don't get though why that hasn't changed somewhat--the demo that they all want more and more now isn't even home to watch the soaps at that time. Wouldn't it make sense to try to play up the older demo? (Yes I know advertisers don't find them as desirable for many reasons, but it still baffles me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that the 50+ demo is undesirable (that's a myth), it's that the 50+ demo is easy to find, so it's cheap to advertise for. Just about every show on TV has a huge 50+ audience, so advertisers aren't willing to pay a premium for them. (They can advertise on just about any primetime show and reach a substantial 50+ audience). They pay a premium for viewers that are more difficult to find, and those are the key demos.

Advertising rates are set by certain demos on broadcast TV, and never on households/viewers. Those demos are:

Women 18-49 for daytime.

Adults 25-54 for morning news shows, network evening news, and Sunday news shows.

Adults 18-49 for primetime shows, and late night shows. (A BIG premium is paid for men 18-34 in primetime, since they are notoriously difficult to find....and the CW sells based on women 18-34).

Then there are the niche markets, like Nickelodeon for instance, who sells based on the 2-11 demo (seriously).

There is NO PROGRAM that makes money based on households/viewers, period. Even the SuperBowl is sold based on its 18-49 potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree the only numbers that matters are the demos but the problem is the demos are bad regardless of OLTL gains and the fact that Y&R is falling is an indication that and I know some don't want to believe this but ABC was right in cancelling AMC/OLTL. 1.1-1.2 demos are what primetime repeats gets, the daytime environment can no longer sustain soaps like it or not that is the reality the audience is just not there. Moving them online and possibly to a cable channel may be the best thing for the genre where smaller numbers are acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, to put part of that in perspective....even at the peak of the soap ratings in the 1980's, they were also doing no better than what primetime repeats were getting, lol. That 8.0-9.0 rating in the 80's was at times even lower than repeats in primetime were getting at the time. (And in the 18-49 demo, Y&R, GH, and OLTL have been the top shows in daytime for most of the summer).

That said, yes, daytime soaps are no longer as profitable as they once were....but OLTL was still profitable when it was canceled. And for The Revolution to retain the same profitability for ABC, it would still have to garner at least a 0.8 in the key women 18-49 demo...and there is no guarantee it will.

I do believe this is the end for all soaps, though. Despite Bob Greenblatt's recent endorsement of DAYS, there is no way it gets renewed again past September 2013. And B&B and Y&R are dead in November 2013 and September 2014, respectively.

Ironically, though, if The Chew bombs out of the gate, ABC might be smart to work out a deal with PP to continue to air OLTL until Katie Couric's show kicks off next fall....and maybe beyond if The Revolution also tanks and/or GH doesn't show a substantial women 18-49 demo lead over OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, what is profitable to you may not be to Disney and unless you know exact numbers and can state them I am going leave the money issue alone because if OLTL was as profitable as you are stating it would not be getting cancelled. Bottom line is Disney likes making money and if these soaps were making them money on the level that they wanted they wouldn't be where they are now.

I really doubt that OLTL is ever going to see it's self on ABC daytime again, I could be wrong but I am thinking that if either The Chew or Revolution fail that ABC will just go with another talk show. I just really doubt that ABC leased OLTL and will now turn around and pay PP to air them in their orignal spot that is not smart business at all, if Disney had an indication of changing their minds with OLTL they would have jumped on the PP plan and air them on one of their cable channels (Soapnet would have been a great outlet until it changed to Disney Jr, with it's built in soap audience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's a good point: if a show's state is not mentioned for many years, it's easier for the revolving door of never-ending newbies in charge to miss out on or get confused about previously-established facts.
    • IMO I get a brotherly/sisterly vibe from Kat/Jacob
    • Yes, the locale officially switched to Illinois in the early-1980s.  But I was watching daily during the entire Lemay era, and I'm fairly confident Bay City was never referenced as being in Michigan in any of Lemay's scripts. Agreed, Lemay did care about AW's past -- and used the past as subtext for many characters.  But it is unfortunate he chose never to mention (or perhaps was unaware of) the Michigan connection.  So by not mentioning it, this may be when that connection was lost for TPTB.   
    • Marquita Goings' wig was going to same a week or two ago.
    • Forgot to post something here

      Please register in order to view this content

        King of the Hill Voice Actor Johnathan Joss was gunned down and shot dead this past Sunday at 59 years old in Texas.  Here's the video of someone recording Joss' last moments before he was murdered.  This Monday past, the suspect turned himself to the police station and currently placed on house arrest until his Trial on August. 
    • I was hoping the Articulettes  would be more like Klymaxx then the Supremes.  Talk about inspiration for a soapy type of stories  (one of the bandmates tried to use the name in order to perform, internal fighting over who was the lead, and the same bandmate that tried to use the name of the group tried to include their name as a song writer... and almost got an award for songwriting). I could see Sharon/Tracy/Anita fighting over all that... and Sharon trying to use the name Articulettes in order to perform and big bad bully Anita and Vernon block it from happening. Shanice is like Amy Vining... but BTG... Amy Vining had a life beyond the nurses station.
    • I don't believe Lemay was the one who negated the fact that the show was originally set in Michigan. Aside from a few curious character mutations, he did seem to care about the past. I think AW switched the local to Illinois in the 1980s or later. I don't think TPTB always knew or remembered the past well enough to give new headwriters full accurate information, anyway. Lemay wrote a story about Pat Randolph killing a predator named Greg Bernard who was targeting her daughter. The writer referred to a teenaged Pat killing her boyfriend (Tom Baxter) by stabbing him, as she later killed Greg. But in reality, Pat had shot Tom with a gun, so TPTB were lax in knowing or correctly relating established facts to the current scribe. Is the specific murder weapon of a long-gone character a vital component 15 years after the fact? Probably not to most viewers, but for those who had been watching way back when, little mistakes like this can be grating. I'm not devastated that AW changed Bay City's home state along the way, but I see this as another grating point that a little research could have prevented. Soap viewers have loooooong memories, LOL!
    • Ooopphh , I just watched my recording and thought, what's going on there. 
    • Yes I was watching AW during that time, but I was very young.  So might have missed the references you mentioned. The late 1960s and early 1970s would have been during the Nixon and Cenedella head-writing eras.  Assuming you are correct, I'm quite surprised (and disappointed) Harding Lemay did not continue the Michigan references.  Especially since he was raised in a far northern region of a northern state, very very near the Canadian border. And I know he loved writing (either directly or indirectly) about his upbringing in that region. Perhaps no one in the studio ever told Lemay about the Michigan connection.  Who knows??  But I'm sure Lemay would have had a field-day playing all those Michigan references, which would have made his AW even more believable and relevant than it already was.  Such a missed opportunity!!
    • To me, there were some weaker writers on ATWT in the 1980s pre-Marland, but starting in 2000, the advent of the show's associated with Hogan Sheffer and Jean Passanante, the quality plummeted and remained in the toilet for the show's remaining years. It's amazing that so many actors were still able to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. I just don't think KMS was one of them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy