Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Member
35 minutes ago, dc11786 said:

I'll be curious to see her relationship with A.J., which is set up quite nicely in May, 1993, between A.J. resolving the Nikki scenario so taht he can move on and Dominique's death propelling Julia to recognize her own desire to have a grand love like Dominique and Scotty. 

If Labine didn't join the show, I am curious if Julia had more mileage in her. With Riche's interest in exploring more modern issues, I could easily see Julia becoming artificially inseminated to raise the child on her own only to have to rectify her position in the business world and how society views women executives raising children.  

Here's where Julia mentions having a sister. 

 

I felt both Julia's relationships with Ned/AJ were cut short?  Or maybe never reached their full potential is probably a better way to describe it.  There was a lot there on paper between the three and it just fizzled out.  

I always thought Julia as a character had legs and it was silly to write her out especially when her sister's story was beginning to really heat up.

Thanks for the clip!  I do remember Vanessa or Mark Teschner saying they auditioned a ton of actresses for Brenda so that might explain the delay in casting her and it was always the plan to bring Brenda on earlier.

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Views 1.6m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Member
9 hours ago, dc11786 said:

f Labine didn't join the show, I am curious if Julia had more mileage in her. With Riche's interest in exploring more modern issues, I could easily see Julia becoming artificially inseminated to raise the child on her own only to have to rectify her position in the business world and how society views women executives raising children.

That would've been interesting, could've even plopped Audrey into the story to offer her own insight into the process since Audrey had herself artificially inseminated back in '67 (under much different circumstances of course and Audrey eventually lost the child).

  • Member
13 hours ago, dc11786 said:

A Monty-less GH between her two stints falls into the trap that "Days of our Lives" fell into between the two Reilly stints. There is a desperate attempt to maintain that energy that Monty 1.0 brought to the table without all the flourishes.

I did enjoy Wes Kinney’s tenure, but outside of using the hospital again and giving Steve and Audrey something to do with Tom and Simone, he really was playing in the scraps left over from her. The Jerome’s, etc. I do think the Snowman storyline with Anna and Grant Putnam was one of the best of the decade though.

i would kill for Pikeman to be revealed as Grant Putnam. His target last fall was Anna, and he did serious damage to her back in the day. Robin was traumatized, Duke went back to the mob which eventually led to his death, trying to find her because Robert was taking too long and shut him out of the search, and Anna had to fight her own way to escape.

12 hours ago, carolineg said:

always thought Julia as a character had legs and it was silly to write her out especially when her sister's story was beginning to really heat up.

At the time I would have kept her over Jenny. But Jenny had Paul and a built in story with Ned and Tracy that needed to be resolved. They both dwindled and were gone soon after because without Tracy there was nothing there.

Edited by titan1978

  • Member

Hi friends!

As an early Christmas gift, I would like to share with you a reproduction of the script (with commercials) of the Christmas Day 1963 episode of GH.  Enjoy this look at the first time Dr. Hardy reads the Nativity story to the hospital's Children's Ward!

GH - December 25, 1963

I hope you all have a happy Holiday season, and I look forward to sharing more classic GH research with you in 2025!

dep

  • Member
2 hours ago, titan1978 said:

At the time I would have kept her over Jenny. But Jenny had Paul and a built in story with Ned and Tracy that needed to be resolved. They both dwindled and were gone soon after because without Tracy there was nothing there.

I pretty much would have kept anyone over Jenny, but I've made it clear I can't stand Jenny.

I think at the time it made sense to keep Jenny over Julia, but was a mistake in retrospect.  Julia would have fit in so well with all the Ned/Lois drama-much better than Katherine.  And once Brenda took off in popularity there was a whole slew of other stories for Julia to be included in.  Once Jenny finished out her story there was no place left for her to go.

  • Member
51 minutes ago, depboy said:

Hi friends!

As an early Christmas gift, I would like to share with you a reproduction of the script (with commercials) of the Christmas Day 1963 episode of GH.  Enjoy this look at the first time Dr. Hardy reads the Nativity story to the hospital's Children's Ward!

GH - December 25, 1963

I hope you all have a happy Holiday season, and I look forward to sharing more classic GH research with you in 2025!

dep

Who are Terence and Joan Maples? I wonder if they were the actual HWs at the time and not the Ferros or Dobsons

  • Member
22 minutes ago, cassadine1991 said:

Who are Terence and Joan Maples? I wonder if they were the actual HWs at the time and not the Ferros or Dobsons

The Maples are listed as writers for Gilligans Island and a few other primetime shows.

Guess they might have written some episodes before the Hursleys took over full time?

Maybe after the Ferros?

  • Member

The Maples material began with the episode airing 16 September 1963. Their episodes are mixed with episodes written by Catherine Turney (7 October -11 October), Milton Geiger (14 October - 25 October), and Rik Vollaerts (28 October - 08 November). The Maples took back over on 11 November-27 December.  With Melvin Levy writing the weeks of 25-29 November and 09-13 December.  F & D took over beginning with the episode airing 30 December 1963.

Edited by depboy

  • Member
21 minutes ago, depboy said:

The Maples material began with the episode airing 16 September 1963. Their episodes are mixed with episodes written by Catherine Turney (7 October -11 October), Milton Geiger (14 October - 25 October), and Rik Vollaerts (28 October - 08 November). The Maples took back over on 11 November-27 December.  With Melvin Levy writing the weeks of 25-29 November and 09-13 December.  F & D took over beginning with the episode airing 30 December 1963.

So I would assume the Hursleys were still writing SFT thru 1963 and these other writers were scripting under the Hursleys outlines?

Had the Ferros written up till Sept? I guess there was no point in hiring long term writers if they knew they's be there full time by Jan.  Geiger and Vollaerts had written for soaps before.

Catherine Turney (December 26, 1906 – September 9, 1998) was an American writer and screenwriter. Born in Chicago, Illinois, she was active from the 1930s to the 1970s. She was one of the first women writers to become a contract worker at Warner Brothers,[1] where she worked from 1943 to 1948 on films such as The Man I Love, A Stolen Life, and My Reputation.

  • Member
47 minutes ago, depboy said:

The Maples material began with the episode airing 16 September 1963. Their episodes are mixed with episodes written by Catherine Turney (7 October -11 October), Milton Geiger (14 October - 25 October), and Rik Vollaerts (28 October - 08 November). The Maples took back over on 11 November-27 December.  With Melvin Levy writing the weeks of 25-29 November and 09-13 December.  F & D took over beginning with the episode airing 30 December 1963.

That’s interesting. Thanks for the information 

  • Member
22 minutes ago, Paul Raven said:

So I would assume the Hursleys were still writing SFT thru 1963 and these other writers were scripting under the Hursleys outlines?

Had the Ferros written up till Sept? I guess there was no point in hiring long term writers if they knew they's be there full time by Jan.  Geiger and Vollaerts had written for soaps before.

The Ferros were credited as writers until 13 September, they wrote with Hursley’s signing off on the scripts.  The Hursleys did pen the unaired pilot episode (different from the first Emergency Hospital pilot). Footage of the Hursley pilot episode can be found on YouTube here:

 

  • Member
12 minutes ago, depboy said:

The Ferros were credited as writers until 13 September, they wrote with Hursley’s signing off on the scripts.  The Hursleys did pen the unaired pilot episode (different from the first Emergency Hospital pilot). Footage of the Hursley pilot episode can be found on YouTube here:

 

It looks like someone has to edit the General Hospital, Wikipedia page on the head writer section

  • Member
4 hours ago, cassadine1991 said:

It looks like someone has to edit the General Hospital, Wikipedia page on the head writer section

Sadly, that page is full of misinformation that I won’t be correcting there.  This is a personal, passion project of mine, and I am not one to call out others for ‘wrong’ info.  I smile and nod if I know for certain what someone is saying is not correct.  If and when my research proves publishable, you can find it on my website: https://previouslyongh.info.

Nothing there…yet.

  • Member
7 hours ago, depboy said:

Hi friends!

As an early Christmas gift, I would like to share with you a reproduction of the script (with commercials) of the Christmas Day 1963 episode of GH.  Enjoy this look at the first time Dr. Hardy reads the Nativity story to the hospital's Children's Ward!

GH - December 25, 1963

I hope you all have a happy Holiday season, and I look forward to sharing more classic GH research with you in 2025!

dep

Thanks. This is a nice gift.

  • Member
22 minutes ago, depboy said:

Sadly, that page is full of misinformation that I won’t be correcting there.  This is a personal, passion project of mine, and I am not one to call out others for ‘wrong’ info.  I smile and nod if I know for certain what someone is saying is not correct.  If and when my research proves publishable, you can find it on my website: https://previouslyongh.info.

Nothing there…yet.

Oh nice. Will DEFINITELY look into this when you complete this.

Edited by cassadine1991

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.