Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Webmaster

I think I'll file this under What Happens Next? The Answers We Know Surrounding ABC and Prospect Park

Before I post it, however, ABC SID already has to restructure unless it decides to remain just covering GH (which isn't hard to do since it gets all the covers anyway). Once AMC and OLTL go off the air, they will no longer be "ABC" soaps.

SOD/SOW already went through their massive cuts. The only thing that'll happen next is they will either fold or more cuts will happen or they will be transformed into Television Digest and Television Entertainment Weekly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They should consider releasing cheaply priced DVDs of the show, since I assume this will be a much shorter timeframe (shorter episodes and fewer episodes made). That way those who won't watch on the computer might be able to see it.

They may as well just fold. TV Guide and EW cover that and those magazines aren't exactly great these days either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's it exactly. Everything's changed. The contracts, the union rules, budget, management... everything. You can't make the same product when all the components have changed. Look at all the changes to AMC that happened just by moving to LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even Passions while staying the same in many ways, cut cast, sets, extras,etc once the move to DTV happened.

I tend to agree on the cast also. I think they need certain characters but not the actors. I might contest Lucci only because she has mainstream name

recognition where none of the others do. And maybe Prospect ends up going after bigger names in the industry for what they view as the more pivotal roles.

And as they say NO actor is bigger than the role. But we have no idea what their budget or cost structure is.

The other part people are missing is AMC is not moving online on Sept 26th at least not that we know of. SO there is going to be a loss of

audience not only because those watching out of habit likely wont move on but also because of the time gap. Remember the OJ trial. Many viewers left

and never returned.

I'm still very excited regardless because this could ultimately be a game changing move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the delay may be OK since this will be more of a new start or an event than what happened during the OJ trial, which was status quo preemptions that people finally had enough of. But I do hope they will try to put on some sort of AMC-related programming after the show's finale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What bothers me about PP's assurances that "nothing changes" in their press release is that they claim the cast will remain intact, but it's apparent they don't have the cast locked in (did any cast member even know about it before it was announced?). So that's one big fat lie already and makes me question the rest of their assurances that nothing will change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really hope they can get some super talented fresh blood in the writing rooms. Gifted, young (and ha, less expensive!) writers with or without prior knowledge of these shows but a genuine interest in serialized drama (with some industry mentors on the team as HW or consultants at least in the beginning). Although there is a lot to be learned from them, a part of this new birth should be the end of relying on all of the usual suspects to HW these shows. Time to make things less cliquish and to embrace talent outside of the soap box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that like everything in this saga the news leaked before anyone wanted to share. Also I believe it was ABC that said nothing would change since it was their statement and we all know what ABC's word is worth. PP hasn't said anything, have they?

Exactly. Using the same people who drove the bus into the ditch will kill this before it starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess it was the original NY Post article (posted in the first post in this thread) that stated the cast would be the same. In the official press release, ABC and PP said the quality, format and length would be the same, but didn't mention the cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJnOpDWJX7b/ 1996 Daytime Emmys GH Best Show, their 4th win, Wendy Riche EP accepting she calls out 3 lost to death - Lee Mathis, Rosalind Cash & John Beradino. She concludes with Claire Labine's words, delivered by Mary Mae to Stone who was near death. It's famous now, "Every moment of my life, whether filled with joy or with pain has potential for grace realized. ... These are gifts from god. ..."
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • If I'm being 

      Please register in order to view this content

       about it I think Jan is a fine supporting part for a solid daytime vet (probably someone from the P&G soaps), as opposed to someone from the production location who is clearly cheaper. Which seems to govern some casting. I get the rationale, but I would start going through the ATWT/GL, etc. rolodex myself.
    • I dont mind Jan. She's good in the minor capacity she is used. 
    • tbqh I don't care about Jan, I don't care about Ashley and I think Jon Lindstrom as Joey is an acquired taste. Jon is a great actor but certain things are in his zone and then some are not. Some days I find Joey credible and compelling, but the stuff with him hanging around the Golden Corral, grumbling about Doug and bitching at Randy is not amazing. If he had material on par with what MVJ wrote for Ryan/Kevin on GH back in the day it'd be a different story. I do think he has real chemistry with Vanessa, which is in large part due to MVJ clearly molding that character (and hiring an appropriate actor) in the Lucy Coe vein when she reinvented Lucy in the '90s as well. But I am not here to spend 6+ months watching Jon glower a lot (which is what he's doing half the time to carry weak story) and make more vague dire pronouncements while Jen Jacob gets flustered and weepy over "Daddy" or whatever would come of that storyline. Putting them together sounds like a recipe for doom to me. But I may be in the minority on that.
    • I know this will never happen. But... Halle Berry as Dani Dupree(BTG). She would rock this role, it's in her wheelhouse.
    • When I see how bad the Ashley/Derek scenes are, I know there must be a larger purpose and Joey being her father is the thing that makes the most sense.  My take on it is that Ashley knows Joey is her father but doesn't know Joey. Maybe he was there when she was a child or just not around at all but I believe Jan when she says she didn't lie to her daughter about who her father was. Maybe she left him when she discovered his dangerous lifestyle.  I do think they could really jump start the character of Ashley if they hurry and do this. Jan is a great character and her scenes with Ashley have been helpful. This would further integrate Ashley into the canvas and give her something dramatic to do. With her working at the hospital along with Doug, it could lead to complications if she learns Doug is involved with her father. I just need is sooner rather than later because Derek is tanking her character. I need a distraction.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The stories are awful. I'm not enjoying any of them. All I'm left with is Sally in a plastic dress.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy