Jump to content

AMC: Wednesday, April 27, 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Since the only soap I watch regularly now is General Hospital, I vote for ABC commuting her contract and replacing that miserable Tracey Thomson... who was just as horrible on AMC.

  • Members
Posted

This Erica story was filmed when she left for her book promo right? That's why it's being played this way?

LOVED seeing Having it All everywhere on this episode--especially as I was just looking through my copy today lol. Liked the Minx stuff, the Erica stuff--the rest was OK.

Jack's an attractive man and prob the fittest male actor in the upper ages on the show--WHY do they always give him shirts and suits that he looks to be drowning in?

  • Members
Posted

Oh come on--this is classic soap red herring--for all the reasons you say. If this was OLTL where characters turn psycho maniac at the flip of a switch I could maybe buy this sudden new side of Krystal, but...

Yeah they screwed up with the instant message--I thougt they did a quick shot cuz Colby would read it outloud, but went back and paused it--not that ti was that important...

Time frames on soaps is always screwed up--on every one I know (I mean what time of day it is) but it seemed weird that JR and crew seemed to be going out for dinner--drinks, lots of food (that as always is barely touched)... Maybe an early dinner cuz of the concert (does Pine Valley have a stadium?) but... And then JR phones Lucretia to tell her to give AJ cold medicine with his lunch? Why couldn't someone paying attention (which Kate Hall usually does) change that line to dinner and it would have all made sense?

Good points but you forgot the most extreme to me--unless maybe Krystal somehow teamed up with David or someone, there's no way Krystal could have been spending days recreating and building Erica's room, a video system, etc.

No [!@#$%^&*]!! Give her some green salad with no dressing and she'd be set for a week! It reminds me of when the Fusion Girls used to get excited to have donuts in some episodes, you'd see Kendall pick a tiny crumb off the donut and toss the rest in the garbage...

  • Members
Posted

Agreed that it's definitely not Krystal. Total red herring. I am curious to see who's behind it. Doubt it's anyone NOT on the canvass, since I don't think they can even afford day players at this point LOL. Probably David and Liza plotting together against Erica for some reason.

  • Members
Posted

It's probably Opal. She couldn't stand to see Erica keep making foolish choices whenever it came to the men in her life when she (Opal) would never have another chance w/ Palmer.

Watch.

  • Members
Posted

It seems that Krystal may be in cahoots with the captor or maybe an unaware accomplice (food delivery).

What was that whole, "I lost my reception."?

  • Members
Posted

I just don't see David ever doing something like this to Erica. Yes, David and Erica all for a little bondage and putting each other through a little emotional hell, but something like this? This is twisted. D&E have never been twisted to this extent. I just can't find a reason, or one that is believable to make me think David would bother with something like this. I pretty much ruled him out when Miranda was threatened. He would never. Not after the baby swap.

Krystal is way to obvious, even for K&S/.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy