Jump to content

Do your feelings on veteran actors change?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

When inspired, Drake Hogestyn wasn't bad. It depended a lot on the writing and who he was working with. In 1986, he's awkward as can be, but that fit in with what John Black was. There are good scenes through 1990.

Maison Blanche falls into the "so bad it's good," mostly because of him. I thought the drug addict storyline had very good potential, but they dropped that. Probably because the storyline it was connected to was an absolute disaster. I thought he was good during the first half of 2008. He was inspired and actually brought something fresh to the table.

James Reynolds baffles me. I thought he was excellent during Slasher in 1983-84 and the 1985 Richard Cates storyline. He hasn't approached that since.

  • Members
Posted

For me, my love for Erika Slezak and Viki herself has never waverd which i'm sure i've said on several message threads. But of course there have been some stories where it was hard for me to swallow. Having Niki Smith take Jessica to bars was the big one. They were telling it like it was 1985 during the Viki/Niki story and we all know Jessica wasn't even born then. The only way i could move on was to say, OK it was 1990 during Viki's stroke but still there were a lot of people living in that house back then and it's hard to beleive none of them noticed. That was probably the hardest one to get over.

Then there was when Viki told Tina to never come back in 2008, even though she has forgiven Todd for countless mistakes against her. Yes i know Natalie and Jared were almost killed in that secret room because Tina knew and didn't do anything. but in the past Todd pretended to have DID to get out of going to prison because he knew Viki couldn't ignore it. Then he took her and a whole bunch of others hostage when everyone was pointing the finger at him for Georgie Philips murder. and then there was the time he tried to trade Natalie for Blair when Mitch Laurence had her and thought he could get them both out but ended up getting Natalie almost killed. and knowing Tess was in charge but made a deal with her not to tell anybody because she found out he was hiding Marty. I'm sure if i think about it the list can go on and on with how he's hurt Viki in many different ways but she always forgave him. Maybe Tina will come back at the end so Viki can forgive her but probably not.

BTW: All Viki fans should really check out ABC.com because it has a "Viki 101" pictorial. Some photo's go way back to when Erika first started. very rare stuff.

  • Members
Posted

I'm not MB's biggest fan by any stretch of the imagination---but I think she was simply bored in the role. I give her props for making Rose the "anti-Lily" for the first 2 years. However, after Rose died, the "vortex suckitude effect" made Lily seem just that much more boring and pointless.

Jon Hensley slept walked for the last ten years or so. In part because MB's stint as Rose made Holden pointless, but also because he had two modes..."angry" and "stable". Aside from his work with Lesli Kay (which he really seemed to enjoy), the Carly/Holden affair (which made me angrier than spit, but obviously reinvigorated Holden's character), and the Luke comes out story, he phoned it in.

  • Members
Posted

^^^I think it was before that---it was easy to see the Holden/Lily dynamic made (and kept) Holden the transgressor/idiot while Lily was DM's golden girl.

  • Members
Posted

IMPRESS:

Eileen Davidson- I absolutely detested her as Kelly #4 on Santa Barbara and thought she was awful. Then she joined DAYS a year later and I was appalled- all of the same affectations and whininess that drove me nuts on SB were still present on DAYS. It wasn't until they turned Kristen into a bitch that I actually started to like her and, frankly, when she came into her own as an actress IMO. I was nervous when she returned to Y&R as Ashley (Brenda Epperson was Ashley when I started watching), as I didn't think she could play a heroine well. But she proved me wrong and I absolutely love her now.

Lesli Kay- I thought she was vastly overrated on ATWT in her first run, but when she returned in 2009, she totally won me over with her performances.

I'm actually rooting for her to get an Emmy nom this year, though her competition is stiff.

  • Members
Posted

Ehhh, I think all actors, particularly on soaps where the play the same character everyday for years, get lazy, bored, etc. I also think that soap writing is so awful right now I don't blame anyone. I guess my attitude is why the actors are expected to make an effort when the writers don't. Plus, if I don't want to watch half the damn stories, I'm sure they don't want to play them. Yes yes I know, "it's their job", but lets not act like you're not a lot less enthusiastic and give a lot less effort at your job when you're doing somehing you don't want to do.

Really though, I ask myself "What actors would I trust with really complex, emotionally gripping material?"

Laura Wright? Hell no.

Susan Flannery? Yes.

Michelle Stafford? I dunno, depends, but I'm leaning towards yes

Sarah Brown? Yes.

Heather Tom? Yes.

Gina Tognoni? Yes.

Maura West? Yes.

Debbi Morgan? Yes.

Eileen Davidson? Yes.

Tricia Cast? Yes.

Melody Thomas Scott? I dunno (and I love Melody)

Alicia Minshew? No.

Erika Slezak? Yes but I'd be prepared for her to go OTT.

Robin Strasser? See above.

Nancy Lee Grahn? See above.

Crystal Chappell? Yes.

Beth Ehlers? Yes (and yes I saw Taylor on AMC and I still think Beth is a good actress when she wants to be)

I guess it comes down to who I think can deliver when they give a damn. Kim Zimmer said that for a long time before Tom Pelphrey came on the show she was very uninspired and felt she had become somewhat stale. IMO, she did, but that doesn't mean she's a bad actress. Lynn Herring sucked as Lisanne on DOOL, but she did not like the character or the writing for it, doesn't mean she's a bad actress. She still delivered great stuff when she returned as Lucy on GH.

Basically, my opinion rarely changes. I think Sarah Brown is a great actress and my not liking her Julia on ATWT or Claudia on GH doesn't change that because I still know the type of performances she's capable of delivering. I mean, I love a lot of film actresses and I can honestly say that I've seen a bad performance/character from each and every one of them (including Meryl Streep).

The older actresses are different. If you were good in the 80's but haven't been good in two decades well.....then I might change my mind.

  • Members
Posted

In some cases the writers do make much more of an effort than the actors. They give the actors some chances, even if the material sucks. But lousy actors like TSJ, JPL, Billy Miller, Josh Morrow, etc. either are too lazy or they actively fight the material.

  • Members
Posted

I will say I always liked Drake Hogestyn..His type of acting is partially the reasons soaps get a bad rap for their acting, but I loved it...He was the quintessential soap actor..and given the material he had to play I thought he did well.

  • Members
Posted

I have to say just like in the real world of work, actors sometimes coast on their material. Doesn't mean they aren't talented, just that they aren't being challenged. I actually appreciate at times when actors do that or else play against the material. If the story goes against the established history of the character, I prefer that to the alternative of the actor acting like this is the greatest thing they had the opportunity to play.

For me some actors it would take me a whole lot not to enjoy them. Others, my interest is dependent on story solely. If I like their story, cool, if not bored now.

  • Members
Posted

Beth Ehlers for me would fall into the "started to depress me" category. I adored Harley for years on GL since she debuted. But then the writers made Harley angry all the time, or it seemed like she was always yelling and bitter. She and later on DAM, were, in my final years of watching the show (2003-2005), the ONLY reasons I was still watching. Then DAM was gone and Harley had been so ruined and the show such a boring mess, I just couldn't do it anymore. And when BE came on to AMC, they once again started her out as a character with a huge chip on her shoulder before they gave us a chance to care about her. But early and mid Harley was a huge fave of my GL experience and I was glad for the chance to meet her about 7 years ago and tell her how much I enjoyed watching her.

There are a couple of actors for me whom I either disliked seeing on screen right away or grew so tired of/bombarded with so much that I have no desire to watch them at all and they are pretty much set in stone:

When Roscoe Born came on as Joe #2 on Ryan's Hope, I hated him: 1) I was a kid and thought Richard Muenz was a hottie and RB wasn't and 2) Born's Joe was written much darker and slimier. Later on, when he came on OLTL I still didn't want to see him. I didn't "love to hate" Mitch Laurence, I just hated him. And two of his subsequent returns, including the last one, got me to stop watching the show.

Thorsten Kaye: his character took over Port Charles (and Kevin/Jon Lindstrom got shafted, I felt) and then his character took over AMC. Just wanted him to go away.

My dislike of these 2 is nothing personal, I just have no desire to see them on screen, to the point of it literally being a turnoff. I would also put Bradley Cole in this category which has more to do with certain fanatical fans than anything else. And Jane Elliot. I know people love Tracy Quartermaine but I was never one of them since the first time I saw her, oh, about 30 years ago. Fingernails on a blackboard to me.

Going back to David Andrew Macdonald, he grew to impress. I didn't notice him much at the end of AW (I wasn't watching that regularly by then) and even early on GL. It wasn't until they allowed Edmund to be fleshed out more, and not just be evil for evil's sake, that I really took notice of how good an actor he is. I was glad for the (too brief) time Edmund was a little less polarized and "extreme-ized".

Tony Geary was a big part of the draw for me on GH (having started watching the show when Luke & Laura literally took off the first time). He made Luke interesting for me to watch for years, even after all the "on the run" adventures stopped. But then, I don't know if he got bored or I did, or both, but it looked to me like he was there on the show serving out a (life) sentence and phoning it in, like "so this is what the rest of my life is going to be like." And at that point, I no longer cared about Luke as a character.

  • Members
Posted

I liked DAM from the time I saw him on AW - I'm just sorry his GL run didn't work out better (although he got a relatively "happy" ending).

Agree with you about Beth Ehlers. It was so tough to watch her in later years.

  • Members
Posted

Thorsten Kaye. He was only good as Patrick IMO. Otherwise he sucks! And he ends up coming on a show and taking it over and that's NOT a good thing.

Rebecca Herbst. Honestly I may get slammed for this but I swear she hasn't turned in a decent or believable performance since the 90's. Her "grief" over Jake's death had me cold and rolling my eyes.

Maurice Benard. He wasn't always this bad was he? Same with Steve Burton. I cannot stand these two and yet they are the "stars" of their shows.

Vanessa Marcil. Boy she sucks now. I didn't use to think so. But the combo of shrieking and bad botox is lethal.

Laura Wright. Wait - when did she start acting?!

Michael Easton. Oy. The less said on him the better.

Joshua Morrow. He wasn't always so bad. In fact some of his scenes were downright amazing (Cassie's death, anyone? The one time I thought he did BETTER than MY Sharon Case). But his phony tears at Sharon's recent memorial service ... Yuck. So badly acted. Noah's quiet grief was much more convincing.

And finally, Michelle Stafford - Was she always this giggly and pathetic and trying to act like a twenty year old sex kitten? She needs to be put out to pasture.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy