Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

They can't just "bump her up" to head writer on the cheap. They have to compensate her accordingly. I doubt Swajeski & Kreizman were big-ticket, anyway... LB might be less expensive than two people, but she's certainly not at a plain-label price tag.

I'm sure on Broderick's end, she would want to pen the show's ending (as opposed to letting K&S do it). As one of AMC's veteran writers who has been there on-and-off through most of its lifetime, her affection and passion for the show is probably only surpassed by Nixon herself.

As for sentiment, as I said before, while it's a business, the sentimentality factor isn't lost on TPTB: they know it sells to fans - as it should. Here's to hoping that since the sun is about to set, that Frons' hands will be off... There really isn't much reason to be too control-freakish now, anyway. Let the writers write. I'm optimistic that, since the party's almost over, things will move more toward that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Actors are in an unenviable position when they feel outraged by, and wish to speak out against TPTB, many of whom are insecure and egomaniacal people with the responsibilities of businessmen and the sensitivity yet none of the talent of artists. This is especially tough if you're part of a small incestuous clique like daytime soap opera. There is integrity and there is employment. CH could have still sat on her hands and held out for a spot on GH. Her and her ex's soaps have been cancelled so she's undoubtedly sentimental and upset and perhaps white wine is involved.

Robin Strasser has never bit her tongue yet she's managed to express her very strong opinions while being respectful and thankful for the fact that she is still employed. AMC and OLTL are now gone and she knows she'll never work for JFP, so why not let it all hang out? Women like her and Victoria Rowell are eccentric but harmless and do not deserve the disrespect they've gotten. The world needs angry people, angry people bring about change. It's just sad that when "colorful" women who are no crazier than your aunt who is the highlight of the cookout speak up and speak out, their arguments are handicapped by their kook-factor. Until the Luccis and Slezaks of the biz speak out, these are the breaks. But why should those ladies speak out and run the risk of sounding ungrateful when they've ridden that front burner through thick and thin? They don't have as much to be outraged about. Look at the FOJ phenomenon ("Well she's always been nice to meeee..."). Everybody's looking out for #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I don't think that is it at all.

I think this is it lol.

I don't think any of them give a damn about soaps. I don't think any of them thought far ahead enough as to determine that the replacement shows will definitely be unsuccessful and only make money for ABC and therefore they should align themselve with soap fans. I think they thought "Alright, let's just tell them we're on their side and maybe we can sell them some vacuums" and Target and the others who are encouraging fans to call them and give them all of their personal information....that one seems obvious too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Still, couldn't have Hoover just stated their intent to pull the ads once the next soap went off the air? It would have achieved the same ends and gotten them the same amount of publicity. I just think the way they are going about it sends the unspoken message that the soaps aren't financially viable. Therefore why not pull the ads ASAP? No risk. Big reward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never said they gave a damn about soaps. I think they believe that these new shows are going to give them very little revenue, that they are being thrown on the air only as a time filler (and one of them is supposedly having huge problems already), and that ABC is taking them for suckers. So this is a way for them to draw a line in the sand, because ABC is saving all this money while assuming advertisers will go along blindly.

If they thought they could make money from these new shows then they would never abandon the network just for some PR boost, especially since most people aren't going to go buy a Hoover (unless they were already going to buy one) over this decision.

It blows a hole in this grand ABC spin that these shows are hip and cool and the way of the future and that all the obese and unwashed just waiting for The Filler can change the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ehh, I still don't agree, and at this point nobody but Hoover has done anything. So it's not "they", it's Hoover, who I still think is merely trying to sell soap fans some vacuums and get some positive press for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's still "they" as in a major advertiser. This also makes it more likely that the other advertisers will tighten the screws with ABC.

I just don't believe anyone who runs a successful company would jettison a relationship with ABC on the idea that soap fans will rush to order vacuums in gratitude. Most people aren't going to do that. I think they know these shows are just slapped together and they are pulling out because there is no longer any reason to go along with ABC. ABC has given advertisers zero reason to want to support these shows - everything from the concept, to the titles, to the rollout, has been a PR mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Happy 18th Birthday, Sophia! I like that Tate gave her a birthday party. And that Marlena counseled him about whether or not he has feelings for Sophia, and his relationship with Holly. I like how messy Tate is and I hope he continues to be messy. He just needs to have more argument/fight scenes with Doug III

      Please register in order to view this content

      Days just needs to work a little bit more on establishing better chemistry between Tate and Sophia, but I still think that’s mostly due to Rachel Boyd. Sometimes, I think that Sophia might secretly be scheming, but with the way RB plays it, (if that’s what they’re going for), it doesn’t seem to be working. Tate was also really sweet and dorky during the party too The drug scenes didn’t do much for me though. I don’t mind that Kevin panicked and ran off with the drug once he heard Steve and Shawn coming, but I felt like that story was the weakest part of today. But I am interested in seeing what happens next. And I couldn’t help but laugh when I noticed that Steve and Shawn had matching jackets Btw, I see Mayor Price established a quid pro quo with Xander today lol I wouldn’t mind that being more than just a plot point. It could lead to some pretty good drama if it’s handled correctly. And it would be a lot better than Xander declaring war on Sweet Bits/Chanel and Felicity.  And Stephanie, finally having her mother to confide in about her life, her relationship with Alex, etc. has been one of the best things about the Paula/Jeanne episodes. The book thing still seems very Ron-like though, mostly because it’s so centered around Alex, sort of like how GH used to make storylines about Liz all about Finn or Franco Hopefully, Stephanie talks to Kayla about the book. I’d like to hear more of her perspective on it. I also like that Kayla and Marlena were there for each other as well. These are such better ways to use all three of them. And, we got an update about John One other thing I’ve noticed about the Paula/Jeanne episodes (except for the ones that are worked on by Jamey) is that they’re longer than Ron episodes. Episodes usually clock in at around 40-41 minutes now, as opposed to 35-37, or as short as 31. 
    • Also Victor being the obstacle for Kyle/Claire feels forced. If anything it should be Diane. Diane has a history of having issues with the Newmans, doesn’t she? Jack could be the one trying to reel her in while she’s meddling in Kyle and Claire’s relationship. They’re making the characters of Diane, Victoria, Nick, Sharon be way too complacent when they could have a stronger role in the younger characters like Mariah/Tessa, Kyle/Claire etc 
    • A year later we had these ratings for the week of May 11-17 1987. This was probably the last time the CBS soaps (at least til Dallas’ finale) ranked this high. Dynasty had already ended its season.  CBS reran the Dallas Early Years movie on Saturday night against Golden Girls’ season finale, which was the failed Empty Nest back door pilot.  Interestingly a repeat Family Ties was #1 this week. The week before the season finale of Family Ties beat out Cosby as well, but it was Cheers that beat them both out with Diane’s exit.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hello to everybody!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm writing a series of essays about the first time of a LGBT character in US soaps. I already have datas about Sharon Duvall in DAYS (1977) as first Bisex, Lynn Carson in AMC (1983) as first Lesbian, Hank Elliott on ATWT (1989) as first Gay (someone have or can find the episode in which Paul Ryan finds out about Hank and does not take it very well? I have seen Hank's coming out to Iva and when Hank gets a bullet to save Paul's life from the latter evil father and when he gets tested for HIV after finding out Charlie's diagnosis, but Soap Opera Digest recaps are too much concises...) and Billy Douglas on OLTL (1992) as first LGBT teen in both daytime and primetime TV (I have seen all the episodes on You Tube. BTW, what a great storyline, why it was ignored by the Emmys? Andrew Carpenter and Billy's father players are both really great in their roles! Oh, well, if OLTL was not nominated for Best Drama in 1994 with Marty's gang rape story which won four major awards and was spectacular, no surprise at all - sadly) and I have read something about Azure in The City (1996) as first Trans, but I'd like to see the episode where Bernado finds out and Azure confirms what is said in that newspaper to have something to quote. I like quoting, it gives the essays more depth. I already read the biweekly recaps from Soap Opera Digest on Tumblr and single episodes recaps on IMDB, but I'd like to have more to write about. And something more about critics and public opinions - I only knows that the storyline was rapidly axed because of bad writing and bad performance by Carlotta Chung, but I have nothing to quote.   PS Thank you @JAS0N47 for your incredible and rich site (and work on it). In particular for the Nielsen ratings on weekly basis lists since 1974 and for everything about Sharon Duval - specially for the script of the confession episode dated 23 May 1977! I'm not a DAYS viewers (I'm Italian, I live in Italy and on You Tube there is almost nothing if not short videos), but I've seen some clips of Marlena's first possession (Deidre Hall is terrific in it! Storyline is garbage, but it has its chilling moments and it is funny - I laugh everytime I remember Kristen say to Marlena "according to the book of demonology"! Was she an espert of demons or what!? ) and read on Soap Opera Central daily recaps about infamous Melaswen (brainwashed Marlena has a particular sense of humor - killing ex alcoholic Maggie with a bottle of wine and Alice with her donuts...), so I know something about the soap. Little, but better than nothing.
    • May 14, Asher Antonyzyn (Danny) interview

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm curious the motivation for keeping Bela on beyond the circus story arc.  Did he play a character like his character on EON, or was he more of a good guy? I know he ended up with Sunny at the end of the series, but I always thought that Sunny/Hogan could have been revived once the lack of chemistry between him and the NuLiza became apparent.   Actually... the NuLiza (Louan Gideon) reminded me more of Sunny than she did Liza as played by Sherry... and she just threw off the whole vibe of the show. I see Estelle has just arrived in the late October 1985 episodes, which only means that Wendy and Stephanie are soon on their way out.   It also appears that the Sarah/Quinn/Wendy triangle was set up by Mayer.. and it looks as though Tomlin is going to deactivate it by the introduction of Colleen Dion's character.   I don't understand why no one on the show thought to look at Quinn and realize that he was the problem and write him out.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I kind of assume they're toning down Rachel's bad seed tendencies a bit to make it less obvious if they're going for her as the shooter. At least that's what I hope they're doing - I've really enjoyed Rachel being a bratty evil DiMera princess and Marlena finally getting a grandchild she deserves. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy