Jump to content

83rd Academy Awards Live Thread


Adam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The LA Times/The Envelope has a great article on Oscar campaigns, dealing with how Sony/The Social Network lost a lot of momentum and probably screwed themselves over, whereas Weinstein/The King Speech played their cards right and how that film's rise was more gradual and how they let the actual film do the talking for itself.

http://theenvelope.latimes.com/news/la-et-oscar-mojo-20110228,0,5480590.story

I've always said the most interesting thing about Oscar season is the way the campaigns are handled by the studios. Many will never agree with what should have won or what should have been nominated, but it's easy to see which Oscar campaigns were strategically the best ones. I'm always glad when independent/lesser known films end up winning big as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's an interesting story. It's always nice to see movies that remind people the royals are not some sort of horrible elitist figures, and I like most of the cast (although I preferred Helena-Botham Carter when she was an actress and not a walking display of dated performance art).

I was most interested in how they would handle the in memorium segment. It was much better than last year, to say the least, and I liked the idea of singing "Smile" and showing various clips of actors smiling. I also thought the tribute to Lena Horne was very moving. "Smile" is a treacly song but Celine Dion gave a very restrained performance.

The only thing I didn't like was they didn't have people speaking in the clips - I think that shows the true range of the actors we've lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I was just saying if they're going to do it, why not just do it with a personal touch? Otherwise, don't do it at all.

There's a lot of a-holes in Hollywood and I doubt that plays in during the awards. Just look at Scott Rudin and Harvey Weinstein who are notorious for being a-holes.

Small independent films should at least make some money. The Hurt Locker grossing 17 million domestic and 47 million worldwide is just pathetic. And THL only sold 1,817,835 DVD units, ranking #32 for 2010. At least TKS is very respectable box office business with 245 million worldwide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the awards were very predictable this year, but nevertheless I was thrilled that Melissa Leo and Christian Bale won. I loved The Fighter and thought their performances were both award worthy.

I thought Anne did a better job than James with the hosting. She just seemed more relaxed and he seemed like he'd rather be anywhere on the planet other than where he was. Bring back Hugh Jackman next year!!

Fashion-wise, I don't know..I didn't think anyone was horrific, but nothing really jumped out at me as 'best dressed'. All in all a very boring night for Hollywood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ratings for AA's

http://www.tvline.co...r-ratings-2011/

Early indications are that Sunday’s Oscar telecast wasn’t a complete dud, ratings-wise at least.

Based on preliminary data, the critically panned James Franco/Anne Hathaway-hosted ceremony averaged a 24.6 rating and a 37 share in the metered markets. That represents a modest 7 percent decline compared to last year. More detailed numbers — including a total viewer tally and demo data — will be available later this afternoon.

A skit that was cut:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhTrlQEZbkI&feature=player_embedded

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read that James Franco was embarrassed with his performance at the Oscar's and didn't go to his after party cause he didn't want to face criticism! Instead, he left right away and caught a plane back to NY cause he had class today. Saw these pics he tweeted:

After the awards, drinking a bloody Mary

022811_james_franco_1110228132101110228133316.jpg

& then on the plane back to NY

022811_james_franco_2110228132104110228133330.jpg

:( I was very disappointed with his performance during the ceremony. Not surprised he was embarrased! Still LOVE him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • WE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE DID!!!
    • Thank goodness, MM arrived! It's also a reminder of how much the show misses her energy. We all suspected she was connected to Dumas and that actually works. And that Power Pink Pant Suit. Fire. They dropped enough clues for us to figure out who AD is. From the timeline, to deep Winters background, admiring Neil and getting CI from Victor. Oh, Sharon are you really going to be the first to break the pact? Those scenes were horribly written. Sharon isn't petty like that - Faith/Christian on a private jet. Sharon isn't superficial. What should've happened is that Sharon noticing that Phyllis is crumbling to her trauma. Sharon doesn't have to a savior, but Sharon would definitely provide supportive advice.      
    • Alan not reading the book was probably wise because he didn't interrupt as much and the five guests (Caryn and Tom especially) were all talking to one another with little to no input from Alan.  I think Caryn was pretty honest about the common bond of being young, new to soaps, and venting about the confusing structure of their stories that bonded them together.  And she was right that the stories changed left and right... her character alone had several stories/love interests during that two year period. Kin was also a bit bitter and I can't blame him considering he was forced on the soap.. and the show really didn't know what to do with him  and Rauch made him feel unwelcome to boot.  I'm sure he enjoyed hanging with everyone when not at the studio.. but I think he doesn't view his time there fondly.. and I can't blame him.  
    • Bill is super annoying. He had no reason to go to the Duprees house other than to try to stay connected to them. At first I thought Kat was going to play only part of that recording so it would be easier to implicate just Eva. That Cody guy seems like he might end up being a stalker. Still adjusting to this recast and I'm already seeing the character's aesthetic has changed. At one point it seemed like Robinson tried to make his voice sound deeper and it seems like Tricia Mann-Grant slightly dialed her performance style to fit with his less imposing presence. Reminds of how the character of Lionel Jefferson changed when he was recast with Damon Evans after Mike Evans left.
    • Andre having mommy issues is an intriguing thought. Vanessa is quite the thirsty thot.
    • I can see that...especially after her phone call with her mother.
    • LOL!  You're right, I'm out of my mind   This is me reacting to your post (if you know Phaedra Parks at all):  

      Please register in order to view this content

      Anyway, thanks for breaking it down for me. Sounds like I need Friday happy hour!  
    • The post 1795 present day stories started out promising once Victoria came back from the past and she was trying to make sense of the past.. while adjusting to the present.  The scene where she and Liz find Peter's grave and she expressed guilt over her actions in the past causing Peter to be accused of her crime and ending up being hung was well written and acted.   It would have been perfect had she mentioned that two men that were important to her were now dead (Burke/Peter). And Angelique invading the Collins family in the present day was a result of Victoria's visit to the past and realizing that Barnabas was out and about in the 20th century started promising with her causing Liz to become paranoid about death (a call back to her paranoia over 'killing' her husband Paul).. and Victoria instantly knowing who she was and trying to warn Julia. It's a shame that shortly after those first episodes back in the present post 1795 ended up becoming too focused on the ghouls/monsters... and downplaying the more soapy elements.  
    • I recently watched the premiere of Santa Barbara. I had never seen it. Most of my knowledge of the show is from 1988 onwards. I know of the show before that, but it's from recaps or individual clips/stories (having seen some of the carnation killer stuff). I can see why SB was not well thought of during its first year. The first episode is not that good. The acting is all over the place with only Robin Wright and Lane Davies making much of an impression. Everyone else is either given little to do or just too overeager/overwrought. Ava Lazar is beautiful but awful. I don't know how long she stays, but my word she is bad. Peter Mark Richman tries, but he's very one note as C.C. There's very little of the Dobson wit except for the few seconds with Anderson's Mrs. Lockridge. Interesting how Kelly is set up as the show's main heroine at this point and Eden is given just a brief mention.  I will say that Valorie Armstrong is a compelling presence, but I know she doesn't last long based on what I know of the show. A shame as they do set up the show to have different economic backgrounds and they also have the Andrades. That was completely gone by the time I started watching. I don't think the Andrades last long either because I don't remember seeing Rosa or Santana when I started following SB in late 88. Santana comes back briefly at some point (I think to kidnap Brandon) but then disappears and then she reappears when the Dobsons return for round 2 but that's with Wanda De Jesus. Did Rosa return then? I don't remember. This premiere episode would not make me keep watching if I didn't know what was to come. @DemetriKaneI just watch when I feel like watching the soaps. I'm an emotional watcher so sometimes I will watch a batch of episodes and other times I watch one or two a day. As I'm watching Edge of Night and Dark Shadows, I can get two or three a day if I'm disciplined.
    • I love how fast they updated the opening, if this were BOLD it'd take over a year lol  I gotta admit Keith is winning me over 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy