Jump to content

January 31 - February 4, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Stop pissing on everyone's cornflakes!

This tread is a far nicer place minus your persistant belligerence, negativity and false bravado.

Most everyone in here is nice, polite. You prove absolutely nothing by bullying and over-personalizing each and every argument.

Get the chip off your shoulder and be happy ;/

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Cable news is skewed for an older audience. The 18-34 news junkies rely on the internet for real news and then watch Jon Stewart and Colbert Report decimate the cable news punditry. Until Madison Avenue changes it minds, the 18-34 and 18-49 demos are the most prized.

B&B did spike last Tuesday and Wed to 2.4 and 2.5 so the bad weather does affect them. It's just unlike the other soaps they don't seem to retain the bounce at all. They fall right back down immediately. Steady may be a better word for B&B than stalled?

Actually, GH had one week biggest bad weather gain of all soaps, that huge 718,000 spike last week in December. They have retained 517,000 of those viewers the last 5 weeks. I haven't run the numbers up but believe they have the biggest held gain.

  • Members
Posted

Sure, for the 1-2 people who actually care about the NUMBERS...

Outside of May sweeps cratering, OLTL retained its viewership pretty well throughout 2009. But it's demos fell to new all-time lows in Dec 2009.

OLTL monthly Averages:

2009 Monthly averages:

Jan 2009 2,453,947 808,600

Feb 2009 2,513,750 769,500

Mar 2009 2,691,950 820,000 --- 1st March sweeps

Apr 2009 2,446,917 748,600

May 2009 2,353,900 780,600

Jun 2009 2,531,864 766,500

Jul 2009 2,515,571 745,800

Aug 2009 2,365,400 745,800

Sep 2009 2,477,000 740,400

Oct 2009 2,430,400 741,800

Nov 2009 2,532,750 736,500

Dec 2009 2,430,400 648,400

2010 proved a different story. February sweeps was successful but viewership immediately fell off March and didn't start to really rise until October. But interesting to note December again hit a new all-time low in key demo.

2010 Monthly averages:

Jan 2010 2,489,000 708,000

Feb 2010 2,599,750 772,000 --- 1st Feb sweeps

Mar 2010 2,395,266 716,400

Apr 2010 2,326,818 662,800

May 2010 2,375,000 725,250

Jun 2010 2,300,467 665,600

Jul 2010 2,358,524 653,400

Aug 2010 2,273,000 657,250

Sep 2010 2,344,750 675,250

Oct 2010 2,427,250 663,500 --- 4th

Nov 2010 2,380,600 643,250

Dec 2010 2,440,000 623,000 --- 3rd

  • Members
Posted

B&B seems to have a steady core viewer; however, the soap has bleed viewers at a far faster rate than Y&R. I remember a time when B&B was almost one million viewers ahead of its closest competitor.

What diminishes the GH gains for me is seeing the show holding the same HH share number as AMC and OLTL. Usually, GH tends to be a little further ahead of the pack.

I'm curious about why an 18-54 demo or some oter sort of shift has not happened. It was my impression that '49' being the far end of the demo pertained to the conclusion of parenthood and, thus, buying. Today, especially in the more upwardly mobile demos, the starting of a family has been significantly delayed. Does't this increase the buying power and desirability of people ages 49-54? Any insights considering you are far more familiar with demos than me? With all this talk of 30yrs being the new 20yrs and 50yrs being the new 40 years of age, I wonder if buying patters have changed? I often wonder if networks and Madison Ave. aren't overlooking a lot of societial change and wasting money in the process.

B&B seems to have a steady core viewer; however, the soap has bleed viewers at a far faster rate than Y&R. I remember a time when B&B was almost one million viewers ahead of its closest competitor.

What diminishes the GH gains for me is seeing the show holding the same HH share number as AMC and OLTL. Usually, GH tends to be a little further ahead of the pack.

I'm curious about why an 18-54 demo or some oter sort of shift has not happened. It was my impression that '49' being the far end of the demo pertained to the conclusion of parenthood and, thus, buying. Today, especially in the more upwardly mobile demos, the starting of a family has been significantly delayed. Does't this increase the buying power and desirability of people ages 49-54? Any insights considering you are far more familiar with demos than me? With all this talk of 30yrs being the new 20yrs and 50yrs being the new 40 years of age, I wonder if buying patters have changed? I often wonder if networks and Madison Ave. aren't overlooking a lot of societial change and wasting money in the process.

  • Members
Posted

I am surprised at OLTL holding a high viewer number throughout the entire week, even with the snow. I would have figured that more casual viewers who were home due to weather would have sampled "T-e T--k", not watched OLTL. I would assume that

"T-e T--k" had a decent increase as well..

Good for Days, too- I never will count this show out.

I am surprised that AMC did not gain more, but 1 pm is a tough slot as much as it is a good slot when you are up against the #1 and #3 soap, especially soaps with high demos too.

It amazes me how many people still watch GH, especially the 18-49 set.

  • Members
Posted

I'm not surprised. Why would they sample the other show, especially if you still like the soaps, but you're not one to record them. The other show is marketed for stay-at-home moms. Should that type of format be on in the afternoon? Seem to me as if it should be on in the morning, but even then IMO I think it will be in the same boat.

I don't watch days, but nice for them.

  • Members
Posted

It's even harder when you keep putting crap on screen. Rylee and the tribulations of St. Kendall is a losing formula.

The first warm spell will decimate ratings for all of daytime: soaps, talk and cable as people run screaming out of their houses. (Yes, I'm projecting but I'm so OVER this cold.)

  • Members
Posted

Snowbound viewers clearly wanted to check out what's been going on in Salem. Good for DAYS. And OLTL too. Y&R, I've only been watching for 7 years, but damn it's a hot dookie mess...

  • Members
Posted

I think that's Days' highest-rated/most-watched episode since last January when Mickey Horton died. I think they pulled a 2.5 or 2.6 and had 3.6 million viewers, if memory serves me correctly.

It was a good day to get such a large audience, too. That episode kicked off the Rafe's Double storyline which will be the main attraction for the next several weeks, and should provide for some classic soap storytelling.

  • Members
Posted

The problem with waiting until spring break is that we're currently in sweeps and the lousy weather is buoying bad product. It's allowing people to believe that the crap on screen is better and more popular than it is.

  • Members
Posted

A fact that has been overlooked is that "The Young and the Restless" has been above 5 million viewers per week for the past six weeks...dating back to the week of December 27, 2010. That is the longest such streak this season and the only time that "Y&R" has been above 5 million for longer than one week this season.

The last time "Y&R" had such a streak was during the middle of the 2009-10 season, when it was above 5 million viewers per week for 12 weeks, from January 18, 2010 until the week of April 12, 2010.

Similarly, "The Bold and the Beautiful" has been above 3 million viewers every week this season, with the lone exception of the week of December 6, 2010 when it dipped to 2.99 million viewers.

  • Members
Posted

So, in other words, Y&R seems to have fallen into a sort of yearly holding pattern where it peaks above 5m for give or take four months? I wonder how much better the show could do with stronger, more focused writing? What I like about this winning streak is that this proves that there is still, indeed, a soap audience. I'd love to see how many more people watch Y&R when you add in SoapNet and online viewing. I remember Days being the NBC.com top show and would guess Y&R does well online, too.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy