Jump to content

Writers and hate vs. indifference towards a character


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Sometimes when you see awful material for a character, and this material generally does a hatchet job on their character and isn't supposed to, you wonder if the writer hates the character. When have you sensed that a writer hates a character and when do you start to realize that the writer just doesn't care?

For instance, I feel like Guza hated AJ Quartermaine, but generally, in spite of the awful stories like Dobson or Alexis/Jerry, he is probably just indifferent to Alexis.

And when does an issue with the actor trump any feeling for the character? There are the old stories like Irna Phillips, whose contempt for Jane House carried over to the character Liz even after the role was recast. And there was the whole thing mentioned again recently about AMC Dixie and the pancakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

On Guiding Light, it was apparent that Head Writer, Ellen Weston despised characters like Alexandra Spaulding, Ben Reade, and perhaps even felt indifferent towards Ed Bauer (slapping Michelle?), and the absent Fletcher Reade. Sometimes I feel as if Conboy/Weston played to Marj Dusay's capabilities as an actress, and ignored staying true to the character of Alexandra.

I think David Kreizman felt indifferent towards Alan-Michael, that's saying plenty considering they dogged the character for his entire run. I can't make heads or tails if he simply hated Rick Bauer or felt indifferent to the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wondered if they hated Ben or just wanted to prop Marty West. I could never tell.

When did Ed slap Michelle? I hated NSA's Michelle, I want to see that. I agree it isn't in character though.

I could never tell whether Kriezman hated Beth. She had some shockingly bad material in his run. Yet she was constantly frontburner.

There were also Sheffer's issues with Jack Snyder, which seem to translate to any true blue type leading man. He hated Tom too, trashing him in the press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that Kreizman seemed indifferent toward Alan-Michael and Rick. However, the show hadn't known what to do with Rick for a long, long time. What bad material are you thinking that Beth had? The affairs with Rick and especially with Coop were interesting enough to me, and came from history in different ways. She also had lots of good mother-daughter scenes with Lizzie and with Lillian. It was much better than the material she was given under Paul Rauch and Claire Labine, where she walked around mute and compliant to Edmund in skimpy clothing on San Cristobel. And then after that was the Lorelei nonsense, I think that was Lloyd Gold or maybe Weston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't remember the circumstances of Beth marrying Alan. I may not have been watching GL at the time.

Oh, one instance of a writer not liking a character -- I think Leah Laiman didn't like Donna on AW. She had Donna be speechless and paralyzed, and then nothing but a silly grandmother. Richard Culliton (who I nonetheless love) was indifferent to the Burrells on AW, they had little material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems many writers hated Donna! Supposedly she was almost going to be the one murdered instead of Frankie during the JFP/DePriest regime. I don't know why, she is such a complex, interesting character. I am lucky to have had my first exposure to her when Richard Culliton was writing in 1998 and gave her so much material with Vicky after Michael and Shane died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl, what (if anything) has NLG said about the whole Dobson thing. I'm wondering where she stands in terms of the JFP/Bridget Dobson thng given her own soap-star making tenure on SB.

Not a writer but speaking of JFP, I know there was the feeling that her personal feelings (real or imagined) for RS had a lot to do with the character damage done to Dorian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kriezman and Wheeler HATED the Bauers, Rick was just the unfortunate character left for them to screw with. It was almost as if they felt that the mere existence of the Bauers stood in the way of their Super Dooper Coopers as being THE core family. (What is with GL's writers and their love of the goofy Coopers?) They even had Lillian make fun of Rick and his memories of the Four Muskateers..

The writing for Beth was just bad, I don't he hated her. Kreizman was lazy so Beth became a victim a heroine or a bitch whenever he needed it no explanation for it. She went from being disgusted with Alan killing Tams one episode to screwing Rick as a surogate to pass off as Alan's kid to keep him (something even Bitch Beth wouldn't even consider.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA, Kriezman simply didn't know what to do with Beth. After Phillip died, she really had no purpose in Springfield. The affair with Rick while married to Alan was just ICKY.

I don't think Sheffer hated Jack, I think Sheffer hated the fact he couldn't duplicate the Carjack chemistry with his bitch Craig. I think he would have gladly torched and BURIED Carjack if he could have.

I do think Hogan had no use for any character with an ounce of integrity. Look at his track record---Andy became a liar, Ben became a liar, Jessica turned into a cheater. Paul went from a devoted son to a trainwreck. It wasn't only cops or Snyders Hogan decimated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's a scene Carl, a second or two after the 7:57 mark.

Please register in order to view this content

After that scene, I never quite viewed Michelle and Ed's relationship the same way as I had years ago.

The first sign that DK hated Rick was this inclination that some how he had helped Phillip sabotage Ross's plane. Did they also try to pin Ross's death on Alan-Michael as well?

On Y&R Sheffer and Co. either hate or feel indifferently towards Ashley and Nikki. It's pretty obvious they hate Jill and Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks @DRW50 for the video. I guess that is the closest we will get to pre-1979 Roger/Holly storylines.
    • Yeah that's likely the case and it will all be awful.
    • I appreciate your POV and ideas here. I don't, however, trust Josh Griffith to make this anything like a good story. My guess is that much of it will be off-camera and that we'll have to be happy with Mariah retelling the nightmare in bits and pieces. Meanwhile, Tessa will still be strumming her damn guitar with Daniel. Ugh. I know I'm negative about this show. I am hate watching with every fiber of my being, and there's nothing about it that's working for me. I never recall Y&R being worse.
    • A batch of photos from Episode #67 which aired Thursday June 5 in USA. Some are scene pictures, and some are behind-the-scenes. https://www.paramountpressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/beyond-the-gates/photos?episode=25710 Posting because there's a pic of director Michael V. Pomarico; and a pic of director Steven Williford whose photo caption says "J. Steven Williford".
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy