My Fearless Prediction:

90% of this thread will be spent mocking fellow posters versus discussing the actual ratings.

If this week is like recent ones, there's nothing in "the actual ratings" to discuss. There's been very little movement. Of course that doesn't stop people from bickering over microscopic shifts.

If this week is like recent ones, there's nothing in "the actual ratings" to discuss. There's been very little movement. Of course that doesn't stop people from bickering over microscopic shifts.

Actually GH has had some pretty significant shifts lately and unless OLTL bounces back in demos it may fall to new all-time low.

Anyhoo, call me crazy but I'd prefer to discuss the NUMBERS than scroll through pages of bickering over whom is more mockable or irritating.

My Fearless Prediction:

90% of this thread will be spent mocking fellow posters versus discussing the actual ratings.

If this week is like recent ones, there's nothing in "the actual ratings" to discuss. There's been very little movement. Of course that doesn't stop people from bickering over microscopic shifts.

And then we could divert a bit into people registering under multiple nicknames so that they can support their own theses in a number of bizarre ways.

Anyhoo, call me crazy but I'd prefer to discuss the NUMBERS than scroll through pages of bickering over whom is more mockable or irritating.

Go ahead.

I hope OLTL and Days goes up because I'm enjoying both shows!

90% of this thread will be spent mocking fellow posters versus discussing the actual ratings

I tend to bow out of this thread gracefully when that happens.

Edited December 17, 201014 yr by Kimmiemae

Fearless Predictions:

-More waxing poetic about "The Good Ole Days"

The good ol' days? Or the good ol' DAYS?

See signature below.

The good ol' days? Or the good ol' DAYS?

See signature below.

Meh. Either or.

The only thing missing in that signature is Deidre Hall levitating from the bed.

(See, now I'M reminiscing.)

And then we could divert a bit into people registering under multiple nicknames so that they can support their own theses in a number of bizarre ways.

SNAP! Do tell...

Scotty just set the ratings for publishing. It should be up about now.

ABC soaps continue to have sucky numbers. DAYS continues to seperate itself from the ABC soaps.

And then we could divert a bit into people registering under multiple nicknames so that they can support their own theses in a number of bizarre ways.

Interesting. I was thinking that about some "The Talk" supporters the other week.

Edited December 17, 201014 yr by MontyB

My Fearless Prediction:90% of this thread will be spent mocking fellow posters versus discussing the actual ratings.

+1 joining TeamEric's table.

Here's hoping AMC goes up. I hope that's okay and not too lame to say. I know it's not nearly as fun as mocking and passing off your insecurities & mean spirit to others!! But hey it is the ratings thread! So I digress

...Here's hoping AMC rises!!

passing off your insecurities & mean spirit to others!!

You done did it now......shhhhhh

Anyway, don't know what's going all with ABC. They need to get it together.

ABC needed to get it together two years ago. Now, they need to either throw in the towel or pull a Bobby Ewing and start from scratch.

ABC needed to get it together two years ago. Now, they need to either throw in the towel or pull a Bobby Ewing and start from scratch.

Exactly. That's why I have no sympathy and no mercy for any of ABC's shows. Until they make some real changes, they deserve these crap numbers.

ABC soaps have been doing crappy all fall - more so than usual. 1.1 is becoming regular for GH in 18-49. There's one person who should really be on the chopping block more than anybody else but I don't think ABC cares enough to do it as long as "The View" is doing half decent.