Jump to content

The Walking Dead: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

So is the mid-season premiere also on Sunday? I'm marathoning a shitload of episodes on my DVR that day because I've only seen up through Season 2. Not sure how many I can mainline in one day, but I thought it was a pointless waste of money to pay for episodes on Amazon between then and now when AMC is showing them for free over the weekend. (Though the commercial breaks are going to take some getting used to)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Incidentally, about the Season 2 finale - the first half is excellent, up til the campfire at the end, really, but once again, Robert Kirkman comes in to poop on the show with his attempts at "character development" and "dialogue," which all roughly translate to everyone turning into histrionic PMS cases regardless of gender. Out of nowhere, everyone's incredibly offended by Rick opting to not mention what Jenner told him. Is this really the most relevant beef to have at this moment in time, given their circumstances? I don't think so. And yet Carol is suddenly all pissy, because apparently Kirkman is feeling the need to invoke the comic book version of Carol (or really almost any other character in his comic), who's a very different woman than the TV show version. "We don't need him!" When would any of the survivors left alive say that? When? They all care for each other, a lot. If I believe one thing about the second season, I believe that.

My problem is that Kirkman takes a very adolescent view of his characters and his world in terms of what he thinks is 'edgy' and realistic - in those comics, virtually everyone's a cynic, everyone's bitter, everyone's ready to turn on each other. Or they're idiots. When Rick went on the warpath in the comics, as he did in the finale of Season 2, it was justified by the character he was in the comics and the characters everyone else embodied and what they'd been through. These characters, on the show, are different. Their experiences and relationships are fairly unique. I just didn't believe any of that crap in the second half by the fire, with Rick suddenly turning into Napoleon and Carol and everyone being all pissed. It just didn't work for me. It was Kirkman from on high, forcing his viewpoint from the comics into the world of the television show. I can see Rick being at the end of his rope after what he's just been through, but they didn't do enough work in the script. Or rather, Kirkman didn't. But he rarely does.

I'm going to catch up on Season 3 (I buckled and bought "Seed" on Amazon to watch, and may watch a few more before the marathon on Sunday) and then try to stay current with everyone else. I don't know where this show will end up, but I just hope that I'm wrong on my suspicion and that this doesn't end up being, as is rumored, a succession of showrunners fired to continue to fulfill Robert Kirkman's (IMO) deeply flawed mandate which creates a lot of very shallow characters and scenarios.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Walking Dead showrunners being fired has nothing to do with Kirkman's vision. He does not have the authority to fire them anyway. AMC is a dysfunctional network that has engaged in a series financial conflicts with the showrunners of all their shows. Showrunners have been fired or have walked away from almost all their shows. As a result, AMC has a horrible reputation in the business and has struggled to get anyone with a decent name to run their shows. The Walking Dead has suffered the most because it is the only show that AMC solely owns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought it was just AMC at first. I've since heard otherwise more than once. At best I think it's both AMC and Kirkman. Glen Mazzara certainly alludes to that in some of his new interviews.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just watched that episode, and I was baffled by her behavior. They'd built up how isolated she felt, but this was a power play, and one which seemed to be done solely to get a reaction, similar to when Lori goaded Rick to kill Shane (only to be horrified when he actually did, perhaps because Carl was involved).

What bothered me with this was that they had a character who could react this way - Patricia. Imagine if Patricia found out that Rick had known that Shane let Otis die. Patricia even led a rebellion against Rick in the comics, didn't she? I get the TV idea of why she had to die - Carol was the "older woman" of the group, and they didn't think they needed another. But why not have them both? Patricia could just die in the season premiere, if it was that necessary. Instead they just let the story of Otis' death end without full resolution.

The scene of Daryl watching the fire (I read a comment that his mother burned up in a fire, and he might have remembered that while seeing the barn burn - Norman Reedus didn't mention anything about that motivation, but I still like it) was incredible. So was the scene when they left the highway and the Sophia message was shown on the car windshield.

Can you believe AMC wanted them to cut the scenes with Daryl on his motorcycle? Do they know their audience at all?

I just loved Hershel in this episode. The guy who plays him is one hell of an actor and he packs so much pathos and dignity into every scene. When I started watching in season 3 he was mostly a C or D level character, but he was such a backbone of season 2.

If they were going to kill Jimmy they should have given at least one scene to make viewers care. There was nothing. Apparently he was originally supposed to die in Dale's death episode, Dale was supposed to find his corpse and then get killed by the same zombie. They should have made me care.

This was also originally supposed to have a scene where Lori spit in Rick's face after she learned about Shane. Someone had the sense to keep that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, I think the reason they did that with Carol was Kirkman. Virtually every character in his comic is that brittle, vindictive and quick to turn on each other, and the dialogue was as broad and obvious as anything he ever did. The comic Carol was a headcase, and I just - can't with that [!@#$%^&*].

I can't imagine why they would've had Lori do that, but it all sounds like Kirkman to me. I didn't have much of a problem with her reaction to Rick as others - I think she was mostly blaming herself, and I really have few issues with the TV Lori that most people do; I think the character is far more sympathetic and that Sarah Wayne Callies has done a wonderful job.

Scott Wilson (Herschel) was stellar and very idiosyncratic as a younger actor, not only in the legendary film of Truman Capote's In Cold Blood, but also in William Peter Blatty's films of his novels The Ninth Configuration and The Exorcist III: Legion (the only true Exorcist sequel, and a cult hit for years), but he has such dignity as an older man. The whole second season, while certainly flawed, really reminded me of a parable of the Garden of Eden, or a Terrence Malick film. They had it all, and little by little it all went to hell.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think SWC might have improvised the spitting. Andrew Lincoln fought to keep the scene. I do wonder if it might have been Kirkman's idea.

I think Lori was a thinly drawn character, mostly there to cause men to fall apart, but I don't hate her either. I think that perhaps my watching the episodes in a few months, instead of over two years, makes me less upset by her, or by the second season. Many of the issues people had with Lori, like her being a prick tease, or wanting the women to clean and cook, I never quite saw the same way they did. The only one that did was her having people run into town for her, but at least the show had Daryl stop this.

The second season was a little talky and sluggish but most of it worked fine for me. Most of it built believably, piece by piece. The payoff was more than worth it - the premiere and the last 3 episodes of the season ranged from good to superb, and that's tough for most shows to pull off for even one episode. If I had any complaint it would be I wanted more life for Beth, Jimmy, and Patricia, but at least Beth got the suicide episode.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Random note - Walking Dead was mentioned on Big Bang Theory last night. Sheldon and Leonard had a falling out because Sheldon spoiled Lori's death. For some reason, I can't see Sheldon watching TWD, but that's just about the best free publicity a show could get 3-4 days before their season premiere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think she was a tease or a brood mare or housewife or whatever. I think that's all fanboys, or people expecting how they would act in their idealized version of a zombie apocalypse versus how real people actually would behave. I thought she was just a human being trying to keep things functioning and struggling with her own mistakes, and I thought SWC always put that across very well. She came off so real, and I was not expecting much, having suffered through comic book Lori for ages. But I've liked her work a lot, along with Laurie Holden's. I really don't care about all the fan rage - I think they do good work, and most of the time I think their characters were/are well-drawn and complicated, even or especially when they're frustrating.

And yes, I liked Season 2 a lot. The Eden parable was more thematic for me, however pretentious that is, not a meta-commentary on the production (though that may yet come to pass).

I've only seen "Seed" so far but Season 3 is pretty exhilarating and quite a change. The group is a very smooth unit now, and I think the time jump was smart (if only for the fact that Chandler Riggs is growing like a weed). I'm not too sure about adding Michonne and the Governor, though. Michonne can be interesting, but at the initial sketch both are very cartoonish, teenage-boy's-fantasy comic book characters - a black ninja lady with katanas and zombies on chains because she's so extreeeeme! A one eyed madman with a tank, or whatever it was the Governor had in the comics! The actress seems good, and I know David Morrissey is great, but Kirkman is a gushing acolyte of Rob Liefeld and the old '90s Image Comics boom and it's always showed. There was a key comment by someone on Deadline a couple days ago ranting about how many more goofy comic book caricatures of Kirkman's fans expected the show to add, like Jesus, the kung fu expert from recent issues. I just can't be bothered with that crap either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Lori was there in part to bait fans - there were multiple scenes where Glen Mazzarra said that scenes were done with Lori to cause a certain reaction (like the Lady MacBeth scene). I do think that it was way too easy for some fans to get into the worst mindset. I don't believe that she led Shane on. I think that a few times she was polite and friendly when she should have left him totally alone (second season), but that wasn't going to make a difference in his mind, he was probably going to stay and obsess over her and over Carl no matter what.

I don't feel the connection I want to feel to Andrea, mostly because I don't quite believe the toughening-up role she got, which was then regressed with the Governor (I believe it more with Maggie). But I also don't see her as a slut or a bitch or any of that. I think a show with so many macho, swaggering male characters and a show that often reinforced gender roles seems to bring in hardcore misogyny from certain viewers.

The Governor in the comic seems very different to the one on the show. The one on the show is more cerebral and slowly builds into darkness.

Michonne, I like her, but I think there was too much hype around the character and they didn't sell the friendship with Andrea, which makes her actions less meaningful. I think the idea of Michonne is a cool idea, but I'm not completely sure this can be translated onscreen. I become annoyed when I hear people say she's a bitch or say that she should have been the one who got the rape story, as she did in the comics, because she's tough and it wouldn't bother her. When she doesn't have an inner life people are more likely to put their own prejudices onto her.

On the commentary for season 2's finale they said originally they planned to have the group fighting walkers in the woods and they'd make their way into the prison, which would also be overrun by zombies. AMC asked for a more "existensial" ending, which led to Rick's speech, and the shot of the prison in the distance. For once I actually did agree with AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • For a homeless woman, June sure has nice teeth. I agree Ted didn't bring the power in the fallout scenes but to can him and leave Tomas, Martin and Derek onscreen? i'm not looking forward to Martin's secret being revealed and have him flail in the spotlight scenes. Yes, he's got a little better, but... When someone like Timon delivers with every line reading, you wonder how some other casting decisions were made. And I need sunglasses every time characters are at Uptown-is that green paint left over from GL's Cedars Hospital makeover? And for the cliffhanger, instead of the Door dash nonsense, simply have Leslie encounter Vanessa on her way out and push past her to enter. As there is no front door have Leslie barge into the living room, with Vanessa following.  Then Nicole can tell Vanessa- it's OK she can leave them alone.
    • My question was basically is Dani the only character to have a bedroom? And then the response was Jacob and Naomi ONLY have a bedroom as their set .
    • Our next installment of Love of Life 1976 Before leaving San Francisco, Cal phones her Aunt Van to set up a family gathering. Van arranges it, and upon their return, Cal and Rick announce that they are engaged. In the shocked silence that follows the announcement, Meg steps in to offer her congratulations, and also to pay for the wedding. But the family members still don’t respond happily. They fear that Rick isn’t good enough for Cal, and are surprised by Meg’s offer. Rick and Jamie visit Meg and ask whether, in light of her acceptance of his marrying her daughter, she |will drop the lawsuit. She replies that she will if he returns as her partner in Beaver Ridge. Rick reminds her that this has been settled; he can’t do that. So Meg, pretending largesse, says she’ll drop the suit, but in fact she asks her attorney to put the suit in abeyance, so it can be reopened at any time. Rick gives Cal a lovely diamond-and-sapphire engagement ring, and Betsy, who has promised to be Cal’s honor attendant, gives ‘her the dress she wore when she married Ben, saying that a bride who really is a bride should have it. Cal speaks privately to each member of the family, hoping to convince them that she and Rick are right for each other and will be happy. Jamie, after accepting Rick’s request that he be best man, checks to see if Meg has dropped the action, as promised. Finding out that it’s only in abeyance, Jamie asks if she is planning to sue her son-in-law in the future. Meg insists that she has acted on her attorney’s advice. Meg convinces Cal to give her two weeks to plans a lovely wedding, but after several days Cal discovers that Meg has done nothing in preparation. She therefore informs her mother that she and Rick will be married this weekend at the chapel. Betsy goes into labor and has her daughter by the natural-childbirth method. Cal tries to reach Ben, to tell him he’s a father, but has to be content with leaving a message. An ecstatic Ben sends flowers and a card to his wife and daughter Suzanne. Meg, in desperation at being unable to stop the wedding, has been drinking heavily. When she tells Carrie she can’t sleep and that’s why she can’t get herself together, Carrie sympathetically gives her some tranquilizers which Tom had given her. At the wedding rehearsal Meg tries once again to “reason” with Rick, but he makes it clear that he and Cal are getting married as planned. Meg then faints, upsetting Cal, who declares that her mother’s health is more important than the wedding. This gives Meg an idea. On the afternoon of the wedding, as the bride’s party waits at the chapel for Meg, she takes some of the pills, then calls Rick and tells him what she has done. When he doesn’t believe her, Meg becomes even more upset and takes more pills. When Rick informs | the wedding party of Meg’s call, they don’t believe she’d do anything that foolish, but Cal and Rick realize they can’t take the chance and go to her home. Finding her unconscious, they rush her to the hospital.Meg is treated for overdose complicated by alcohol and eventually regains consciousness.Van and Bruce offer to take Meg to their, home to recuperate, but Cal, worried because Joe raises the concern that Meg could try it again, allows her mother ‘to convince her to take her home with her. Meg is pleased with herself for having managed to come between Cal and Rick, and begs Cal not to let Rick come to the apartment, as she can’t bear to have him see her like this. Meg then works on Cal’s conscience by pitifully admitting that she loves Rick and can’t live without him. Van tries,- without success, to make Meg see that Cal and Rick are in love and can make each other happy, but Meg won’t give up and suddenly begins to have “headaches.” Even Betsy overcomes her bitterness at Meg and brings baby Suzanne to see her,trying to get Meg interested in living again. But Meg insists she can’t do anything because of her delicate | condition and has no interest in Beaver Ridge at all. .Rick has to go to New York on business and asks Cal to go with him. She replies that she can’t; she’s afraid to leave Meg. Cal, with Hank, sees Rick off at the airport, and just before he boards, he gives her a letter to read later. She reads it at home that evening; -it’s a plea from Rick to join him in New York and get married immediately. He tells her that their love and their being together are the only things that matter.Cal puts the letter in her handbag and goes to shower.Meg has seen the letter and reads it. Upset that Cal might do what Rick asks, she goes to Joe at the clinic, claiming she’s sleeping badly, and asks for sleeping pills. Joe, of course, refuses to give them to her, and, as she has hoped, he calls Cal to warn her. Cal now redoubles her efforts to keep an eye on her - mother. Meg, complaining of another headache, asks for water to take aspirin and takes four tablets from abottle, which she holds so Cal can see the label has been removed. When Cal snatches it and demandsto know what she’s taking and where she got them,Meg “confesses” that she went to a new doctor for sleeping pills because Joe wouldn’t give her any. Seeing she’s got Cal where she wants her, Meg presses Cal to promise she’ll be there as long as she needs her. Rick’s New York trip comes to nothing when he discovers the prospective backers want almost complete control of the project. Jamie suggests that Rick talk to Meg again about dropping the suit, as every cent Rick has is being tied up by this litigation. Rick insists that Meg won’t do any favors for him, and he isconvinced that her suicide attempt and subsequent emotional instability are just a scheme to tie Cal to her. But he realizes Cal won’t be able to see it this way. Rick sees only one more possibility to his financial problem: Ray Slater promised to help him if hearranged a meeting between Ray and Jamie, which Rick did. As a result of that meeting, Ray informed Ian Russell that he might be able to get Beaver Ridge for him but will require a piece of the action if it works out. Rick arrives home to find a distraught Cal, who informs him that she was warned by Joe to watch out for Meg and, sure enough, she discovered her trying to pass sleeping pills off as aspirin. But Rick insists on knowing the name of the doctor Meg got the pills from, and when he attempts to call him, Meg backs down and admits there was no doctor and no sleeping pills—the bottle contained her allergy medication. Cal is horrified that she allowed herself to be taken in again by Meg in spite of knowing firsthand what her mother is like and warnings from the entire family. Rick insists that she get away from Meg now and go visit Betsy until he gets things settled. As soon as Cal has gone, Rick insists that Meg come out of the bedroom where she has barricaded herself, and tells her he knows her too well to believe she would ever take her own life. He tells her he admires her and would like them to come out of this as friends. Meg makes it clear that friendship isn’t what she wants from him. But when Rick picks up Cal, who now wants to get married right away, and | returns to her apartment, they find a note from her “loving mother” saying she and Rick are now friends and they should call her after they are married.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy