Jump to content

GH: Bob Guza: "We Don't Glorify the Mob!" (Barf)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They have to know by now they can't keep this [!@#$%^&*] up forever. Maurice Benard is a patriarch at best at this point and Steve Burton has literally begun to resemble a beast of burden. Jason and Sam are a joke, the endless repetitive cycle of "elaborate gunfight sequences" are boring, the "bad mob" threats are interchangeable as are the lame-ass, weak-[!@#$%^&*] 'antagonists' they use to attack the police, like Claire and Detective Deep Pesto or whatever the [!@#$%^&*] his name is. Next year they'll be gone and it'll be another of Jill's friends in the roles. It's just a joke. Michael got butt-raped for his father's sins - that should be the end of the mob cycle on GH. There is literally nowhere else to go after that, unless Sonny's career in crime were to cost Brenda, his one salvation, her life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The aging may be one reason why Johnny is still there, as some sort of backup. I guess we'll see. I thought he would be long gone by now.

The main problem is that they set up big moments but never care about consequences or followthrough. They have done this over and over and over. Sonny shooting his wife in the head, for example. I think they miscalculated on the whole shooting Dante thing because it was someone viewers knew was a decent person and they made Sonny and Jason shoot him only because he was a fed. The show obviously thought it was enough that he was seen as a turncoat or a liar, but it wasn't. And the stories since then have continued to half-ass. Kristina falsely accuses someone of beating her, it's all forgotten. Sonny almost blows Kristina up -- this makes her love him. Michael's rape also seems likely to be forgotten or just used to make him more of a stoic figure like Jason.

They are so protective of Jason that they suffocate him -- he now does nothing, says nothing, is nothing. They have to write around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That reminds me of Wendy Riche accepting the Emmy for mob-infested GH and decrying violence on tv. I was like "ARE YOU KIDDING ME???"

I knew the mob was going to be glorified the minute they introduced Michael "Sonny" Corinthos and went to great pains to rip off The Godfather, right down to all 3 names. You couldn't tell me then they weren't going to try to turn MB into Al Pacino. I mean, he's even short and dark like AP.

GH had frontburner mob characters on before, primarily Frank Smith and then Duke Lavery. But Frank Smith was never anything but a villain (impacting really only Luke & Laura) and Duke Lavery was more of a reluctant mobster than a kingpin (who interacted mainly with Anna,Robin, Frisco & Felicia). Neither one ever came close to dominating the show with the current mob stranglehold that's been going on for almost 2 decades now. I mean, had GH not decided to make almost every character and storyline tie into Sonny or Jason in some way years ago, I might have continued watching.

The mere fact that the show has been dominated by the mob--when it's supposed to be General Hospital and not The Sopranos--is glorification, to say nothing of the numerous relationships and prison avoidances they've had and the mockery that is the police dept. Granted, I haven't watched in some years but it doesn't seem any of that's changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was such a missed opportunity, especially with May sweeps.  And, it would’ve been a much better story for Naomi/Jacob than whatever’s going on with June 
    • https://www.hulu.com/hub/tv/collections/9979 Amazed! But loving it. What this shows is GH Hulu out of top 15, GH is #2 & this was Saturday. Are we happy campers? Yes, at least for the moment, you bet we are.
    • I forget his name but Tori Spelling and Jennie Garth had the EP on after they didn't understand the 60s flashback episode due to the lack of original music. He felt that was one of his strongest episodes so he came on to explain to them just how much the music changes hurt the series. Basically, they only allowed him to pick a selection of episodes he felt the music was vital and other than that they didn't bother to save the music.  They kept music for prom and things like the Color Me Badd episode and for most of the musical acts but any music you loved from the opening of the show or just music played in random scenes was cut.  I know there are also some scenes cut but I don't know too much about that. The most glaring one was Clare's final scene being cut which is obviously a huge problem for a character who'd been around for so long. Overall I was able to enjoy my rewatch using the DVDs but without all of the original music it isn't nearly as good a show.
    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
    • I actually love the new fashion.
    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy