Jump to content

DAYS: Discussion for month of August


Recommended Posts

  • Members

LOL perhaps you should consult. Higley just cannot do Reilly stories properly. I might be in the minority, but these payoffs have been lacking for me. I'm still pretty bored. How come everyone had to leave the wedding in order for this EJ/Rafe/Sami stuff to go down? It would have been more engaging if all the drama played out with everybody still there. Reilly would have definitely milked that wedding for all its worth. Just seems like a big waste of time to have everybody at this wedding, then have them all clear out when we get to the good stuff for the most boooorrrring reveal possible. Ugh.

So anyway, this Daniel/Chloe twist is interesting. Kind of. I'm not really convinced it was *already in the works*, but we'll see. I'll tune back in next week...or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

LOL For sure. I can definitely do a Reilly story better than Higley can.

Yeah, it was so stupid for everyone to leave. What was up with that!? The reason why you have a revelation at a wedding is so that it can be revealed in front of everyone. That's soap opera 101!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But this isn't a Vivian/Maggie story, this is a Vivian/ Maggie/ VICTOR story with the outcome being known to all. I doubt we are going to see anyone struggling in the sarcophagus like we did Carly in the 90's. This is about thwarting Vivian. Maggie is just the excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

If it's only about Vivian being thwarted, what's the fun in that? And why bring up the sarcophagus if you're not going to use it. What a tease! Once you mention a sarcophagus....you got do it....you gotta go there if you mention it. Then you build the anticipation of it happening. Also, a storyline of this magnitude should've planned at least a year ago. If they wanted Maggie to be in the sarcophagus, then they should've built a Vivian/Maggie rivalry last year, not a couple months ago. And Maggie/Victor's relationship should be deeper for the anticipation of the rescue/reunion to be bigger. Now is not the time to do a buried alive story for Maggie/Victor/Vivian. You do it February or May next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Loved the Nicole/Victor scenes! Hilarious! Lol @ Nicole calling Victor a "Nasty old man" LOL!! And Victor had so many fantastic lines, that the list would be way to long. Love their scenes always!!

Love Maggie helping Brady...he is turning into quite the mess. His beard has grown out, he's continuing with his drinking, wonder if he'll turn to coke again to?? Doubt it, but I'm glad Maggie has been brought into this story and is helping him.

EJ's secret better be revealed tomorrow, I can't take it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You really expect this show to take all that time or to plan things ahead any better than they when they have the filming schedule they have and cancellation is going to be looming over their head any day now? This is a reality all soaps face and those that don't now will face. That is why you can't really completely go with the JER style because soaps just don't have that luxury of time. They don't know if they will be here long enough and if the audience will stick with them long enough. The closest to that kind of thing you will get is the baby switch last year.

As far as all the people leaving, again, so what? You can't treat every reveal the same. The only people of all the guests who would've been shocked were Will, Lexie, and Roman. Stefano already knows the freaking secret and Kate just wouldn't care beyond getting angry that Stefano knew and what it could mean for her and Will. They will find out soon enough anyway. I like big reveals too but that doesn't mean you do that every single time just because it's a wedding and a big reveal. I sometimes find it stupid when soaps do that anyway. They all just stand there with their jaws dropped like a bunch of idiots. It's actually nice to see a realistic take because what Sami did is what a real person would do. Send everyone out so the matter can be discussed in public and without further embarrassment.

All that being said, it does sort of anger me that the others did leave simply because I'm sure it had to do with Alison Sweeney's taping schedule. Otherwise, I bet the other guests would've stayed or at least some of them. AS really is holding this show hostage. They probably couldn't get everyone else to work around it for another episode or two so they had to write the other characters out of the scene. Hence why the show bothered to spend so much time on why everyone left and where they went. If it wasn't some planned thing, they wouldn't have bothered.

Whatever. The real payoff comes next week. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it had more to do with the fact that this entire story has only been about rafe/sami/ej, and there is no need for anyone else to be there when she finds out. people like roman and caroline, i really wish they would be written out. they are not used and in situations like this if they were used it would feel so fake and forced, to me. both of them just come in and judge sami, belittle her, tell her what to do, and then move on. It isnt even a days issue, its like this on other soaps too.

As for AS, the show knows far ahead of time what her taping sch is. They work around TBL, and she works other things around both. So if that is the reason, its no excuse at all. Days just is very hit and miss with using its cast, and right now its very miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Higley probably feels the same way, which I suspect is why her reveals (and writing style in general) is boring as drying paint. All reveals are not created equal, true. But after 6 months of foolishness, with a juicy secret like *that*, I very much expect a big reveal. Otherwise, save us the trouble and drop the bomb after a few weeks if its not meant to be that significant. This isn't an after school special, its a soap opera--theres no reason why it can't be suspenseful, exciting and realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But why?

Aside from wanting a big reveal.. why?

How is anyone but Sami really affected? Will would be the next one most affected, but caroline, lexi, roman? Sure they are related to the tyke, but they were not involved in this story at all, really. So to see them all outraged and hurt and telling sami i told you so and see lexi be pissy at her family again, whats the point?

I love a big reveal, when its needed and people are connected/relevant to it. Samis downfall in her vegas wedding to austin was a perfect example. But this isnt a secret like that. This is directly related to Sami and only her. Everyone else who needs a reaction will get one, but they dont need one at the moment she finds out. IMHO anyways.

As for JER style stories, i am fine with days leaving that in the 90's. He was good at it for a few years at best. Nobody can recreate it, he couldnt even do it. Leave it in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that's the thing - there ISN'T a Maggie/Vivian rivalry. It's all in Viv's head. Sure we all have a pretty good idea of where Victor/Maggie are heading eventually, but it's not going to be conventional and Maggie is far from accepting her growing feelings for Victor. Ironically Vivian is the only one who sees what's happening, but her twisted way of dealing with things will be her undoing. For an actually rivalry to exist, Victor would have to be interested in both women and that's just not the case.

And as for timing, but the time Vivian actually gets Maggie to the Sarcophagus, it probably will be November and that will have made a good 6 months of this so-called "rivalry". (Being away from Days for years and now returning, I'd forgotten how they drag things out. It's like every character needs a POV and several interactions per day.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Exactly. Don't bother revealing it at a wedding if you're just going to have 3 people. There's no point of rearranging the set, getting new costumes, having guests come over - there's no point.

One of my soap opera philosophies is: big revelations, with so much build up, should happen at big events - it's just more fun that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I agree. All I'm saying is, don't do it now. I don't read spoilers so obviously don't know if it's going to happen in September or November. I just think it should be done in 2011 when there's more depth to Vivian/Victor/Maggie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree completely (although I wouldn't write out Caroline but that is a personal bias of mine LOL). This reveal was handled right, about as right as possible given the story blew and was rushed to an end. It fit the story.

Also, the show really didn't have to rearrange sets or anything like that. The Dimera Mansion set is used in pretty much every episode anyway, which is why they used it for the wedding to be able to save the money (given it was going to be an interrupted wedding anyway). They only had a few guests and those who were there all pretty much lived in the house outside of Lexie (who I think may have only been there just to fulfill her guarantee) and Roman (who was pretty much the stall tactic to make sure Rafe arrived in time to stop the wedding) so you kind of had to have them there even if they weren't necessary since the wedding was in the house. They were quickly written out of the reveal because they weren't needed anymore. This reveal was focused on the people it was supposed to be focused on.

To be fair, I get what people are saying but I just don't think it can happen in this day and age of soaps, especially for Days. And I don't think the show's limitations hurt them in this case because I think the reveal played it as it should've. It wasn't perfect but the structure of it all was IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
    • 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived at CBS. I pointed out 1995/96 Murder, She Wrote as sabotage in the Tank Jobs and Sabotage thread.  
    • I think Flannery did some great work, but I always found Stephanie's underlying hypocrisy off-putting. And while I don't think KKL's the world's best actress (I completely understood why she's received so little attention from the academy for her work), I do think that her appeal as Brooke was responsible for a lot of B&B's success.
    • FROM THE VAULT: DAYTIME TV SPECIALS: 1/1/73-12/31/73: A complete list of all rated Daytime TV Specials aired in 1973: Note: Not all Watergate sessions were rated.  

      Please register in order to view this content

      EXTENDED DATA: JANUARY 1973-JANUARY 1974 UPDATE FOR ALL SPECIALS SERIES: Here is the update added in to the February 3 post (which already has this info for February 1974-December 1979). The extra details (episode titles and cast) for the special recurring series (and additional data for a few other specials):  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy