Jump to content

Big Brother 12: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 265
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

Opps...yeah, I meant Enzo. By Enzo going up, this gives Hayden to vote out Britney.

I think it's "boring" if you have no rooting interest. Sure there hasn't been many fights or big power plays, but I've been satisfied with this season. It's definitely not one of the best though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Awful, awful season. I was rooting for Rachel & Brendon but didn't care enough about either to really.......care if they won (it was pretty clear that neither would win from jump).

If I had to pick, I hope Hayden wins at this point. IMO, he's played the most level-headed game of anyone left.

Either way, this is by FAR the WORST season ever and easily the worst cast the producers ever assembled.

When I find myself missing the mess of a season that was S9 (Adam, Sheila, Natalie, Matty, Chelsia, Porn James, Amandas, et all), something is seriously wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ive thought of it but I dont think I could expose myself and completely lsoe my privacy like that. There are thousands of people watching you online almost every minute of the day catching and criticizing everything you do and say. I dont think I could handle that especially bc the internet is brutal. I dont think Id want everyone knowing my business. Id do something like RW before BB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My sister has tried out since S9 & made the semis every time. This year, she came very close to making the final round, so close that the producers emailed her asking for candid photos of her AND emailed her to let her know that, while they liked her A LOT, they didn't think she would fit with the particular people they had in mind.

She wouldn't have fit in with them, but it sucks because she would have been FAR more entertaining than anyone on there this year AND easily could have won with these dopes. I guarantee that, at the very least, she would have exposed the Sh!t-gade by week 2 or 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Woohoo! Britney's safe for another week - thank you, Lane! I hope Lane/Britney stick to their word and bring each other to the final 2.

I thought the first two punishments were kinda weak but I thought the 3rd one (the dancing) was pretty funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved the 3rd punishment, LOL! I was laughing so hard during that whole segment....Hayden's dancing, LMBO! Loved all of it!

also lol @ Enzo and Ragan's last battle in that veto competition! I rewinded so many times on that part!!

Glad Britney is safe, YES!! I hope Britney and Enzo vote out Hayden, or it will be a tie..and I think Lane will have to pick who leaves?? I see him voting out Hayden, since Lane thinks Hayden would beat him if they were in the final 2 together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ragan is going out. Why in the world would Lane choose to get out Hayden over Ragan? Lane has 3 people that would most likely take him to F2. Ragan is not a guarantee. Ragan definetly wouldnt take him to F2 over Britney bc he knows Lane has Brigade votes. Besides if he were to backstab Hayden now and get rid of him over Ragan, he'd most likely lose his respect and vote. Enzo too may not trust him after that. Considering Lane cant play for HoH and theres only 4 of them with veto winner having the sole vote, Lane cant afford to piss anyone off bc he's going to have to trust the others to take him into final 3, if he doesnt get that veto. Keeping Hayden is the safest chance of having that done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
    • I actually love the new fashion.
    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy