Jump to content

June 7-11, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with you Monty. There is no way ratings will ever get back to 1999, or even earlier, levels even if the soaps got storytelling back to their glory days. 500+ channels, youtube, soapnet - which I know is going away - but it provided another avenue to watch these shows - people have moved on. My 18 year old niece loved soaps a year ago, but then got into Facebook bigtime and someting had to give - she couldn't do both so Facebook won out. Technology is killing the soaps even more than show runners, writers and networks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If it were just technology than the declines would have been more severe in eras when people started having more and more to do outside the home, or when VCRs first arrived. Ratings held relatively steady up to the early 90s, which is when soaps became even more desperate to alienate their longtime viewers to chase youth demos. That's when the freefall began. Soaps don't give people a reason to keep watching. Technology hasn't suddenly made a big lurch forward in the past few years yet some of the shows still had sudden ratings drops. I think people just hang on and then can't take any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Primetime still has big ratings when they make the effort. No network is going to get what they got before cable became popular but cable hasn't decimated the main networks outright. On nights when a show is interesting enough to people, American Idol will get 20 million and NCIS running in a rival timeslot will get 15+ million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But Carl, people may not realize it but technology has taken huge leaps just the last few years. It wasn't that long ago streaming video online in HD didn't exist. Now you don't need to go home to watch Tiger Woods play golf, the tournament will stream it live to your PC. You never really have to turn on ABC again while traveling, because your iPad comes with a built in ABC player that will literally play GH and Desperate Housewives in your lap. I used to watch old reruns on WPIX in NY. Well, WPIX is crap these days, so when I want to watch an old episode of Star Trek or whatever I go to the official Star Trek channel on youtube and watch with limited commercial interruption. In the 90s none of this existed. There wasn't even digital cable with the 500 channels then, I think I had 80, 70 of which I never watched. The last few years has been huge for technology with regard to video, which is why Blockbuster, Tower Video and the Virgin Megastore are all gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes but none of this has caused any major defections in ratings. Primetime is about where it was a few years ago, if not higher.

Besides, there's a good chance that within the next few years, the ISPs are going to start charging for how much bandwidth you use, and a large number of those who currently enjoy streaming video and Youtube are going to start watching less and less if it means paying big money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ratings for awards shows and sporting events are up from recent years. The shows which are aging get less viewers but other shows like NCIS or Big Bang Theory have increased in viewers.

I haven't seen any big drop. If there's any drop it's that some shows get older and nothing has replaced them in being interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Though OLTL may bring in more viewers in the demos it has also lost more then any ABC soap.

Good for AMC being the top rated soap. I thought it was good last week.

Also glad to see a little bump for ATWT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't understand the praise for AMC. Any overall ratings gain is erased by the terrible 18-49 women demos. Same goes for B&B and ATWT is even worse. Frankly, I don't know how any of these soaps other Y&R are managing to stay on the air with those demos, summer or not. I have to think that another round of budget cuts is coming for the lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy