Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Y&R: Former AMC & GL Actor Joins Show

Featured Replies

  • Member

JER was doing something genius. He was crafting a send up of the genre. And when "serious" shows like Y&R and OLTL start doing what he did on Passions, they are legitimizing JER's satire.

JER was never doing satire with Passions until he realized people thought the show was an utter joke. He definitely wrote it mainly straight for the first couple years.

  • Replies 140
  • Views 12.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

JER was never doing satire with Passions until he realized people thought the show was an utter joke. He definitely wrote it mainly straight for the first couple years.

Not really. The satire was there from the very beginning. JER was poking fun at classic soap tropes from the get-go. You're confusing "satire" with "spoof".

it doesnt legitimize it. It only shows that it continues to be dumb and stupid. Its one of the main reasons why people are dropping these shows

Yes it does legitimize it. It proves that JER was right, that this is what soaps are all about and why they're dying off.

  • Member

JER was never doing satire with Passions until he realized people thought the show was an utter joke. He definitely wrote it mainly straight for the first couple years.

Exactly.

  • Member

Not really. The satire was there from the very beginning. JER was poking fun at classic soap tropes from the get-go. You're confusing "satire" with "spoof".

How so? Can you give me some examples?

There was nothing satirical about Passions. Period. Reilly was good at crappy camp, but he was never a satirist. :rolleyes: You're making it sound like Passions was a TV version of The New Yorker. Clever and subtle, Reilly never was.

And for the record, I definitely watched the first three months and there was no attempt at making fun of soap operas in the very beginning. Reilly was hoping that his paranormal/sci-fi + romance blend would work on this show the same way it worked on DAYS in 95. Problem with that is a.) He didn't have a strong technical producer to reign his awful ideas in(say as much sh*t as you want about Bell-Trained Langan, but he made that sh*t work during Reilly 1.0) b.) He had a really green and weak cast and c.) Reilly proved that he was a one-trick pony.

Yes it does legitimize it. It proves that JER was right, that this is what soaps are all about and why they're dying off.

So soaps are all about outrageous incest stories, bad acting, promoting homophobia, and Catholicism? Really?!

Reilly definitely made a point when he wrote Passions. He made it a point to drive his loyal viewers who actually watched this crap insane and he used Passions to project his own misogynistic, homophobic, religious views onto whoever was stupid enough to watch it. So yeah, Passions was legit. Legitimately a hot steaming pile of sh*t.

Edited by bellcurve

  • Member

Yes it does legitimize it. It proves that JER was right, that this is what soaps are all about and why they're dying off.

Hi, do you remember that Passions was cancelled... twice?

  • Member

Hi, do you remember that Passions was cancelled... twice?

Apparently not.

And to say a sh*t show like Passions set the "tone" for the modern daytime drama is just bull. Sunset Beach did in three years what Passions did in its nine years on the air 10X better(except for, maybe "Love is Ecstasy" which was just a very off the chain track and musical number).

I liked Reilly 1.0 at DAYS and I really expected Passions to just be a darker, more intense, higher budgeted DAYS. Man, was I wrong.

  • Member
I liked Reilly 1.0 at DAYS and I really expected Passions to just be a darker, more intense, higher budgeted DAYS. Man, was I wrong.

I hated everything Reilly wrote for DAYS; therefore, my expectations for PASSIONS were low. Nevertheless, I gave it a chance. Trouble was, after just two episodes, I couldn't stand it anymore, b/c the acting was just that awful.

Back to Jeff Branson: after watching yesterday's Y&R, I'm wondering if he's a Ryder recast. They sure left that plot point open-ended, didn't they?

Edited by Khan

  • Member

Back to Jeff Branson: after watching yesterday's Y&R, I'm wondering if he's a Ryder recast. They sure left that plot point open-ended, didn't they?

I can't see them doing that, even if Bethel wanted to leave. Tptb seemed more enamored with the actor rather than the character. He would more likely be a Chance recast.

Edited by lovely_m

  • Member

When I first read this I too wondered if it was indeed a Chance recast. If so, he will once again be paired with one of his leading ladies from his AMC days Liz Hendrickson.

  • Member

When I first read this I too wondered if it was indeed a Chance recast. If so, he will once again be paired with one of his leading ladies from his AMC days Liz Hendrickson.

That lovely story where Jonathan beat Maggie and controlled her. For today's Y&R, that's hot stuff.

  • Member

Yeah, except, instead of a brain tumor, we find out Nina's long-lost son, Howie, has been masquerading as Chance and holding the real Chance hostage w/ help from David Kimble's kids.

  • Member

When I first read this I too wondered if it was indeed a Chance recast. If so, he will once again be paired with one of his leading ladies from his AMC days Liz Hendrickson.

The actor is not the problem with the Chance character. I know alot of people like to blame Driscoll for how awful the chance character is, but he can only act what is written. They haven't given him anything remotely interesting to play. It's like Coop 2.0. If they gave Driscoll another beat to play, I'm sure he would be able to play it.

Jeff Branson would not be an upgrade. He would be just as boring because they don't want to write anything remotely interesting for this character. Unless they decide to turn him into a psycho overnight.

That lovely story where Jonathan beat Maggie and controlled her. For today's Y&R, that's hot stuff.

Honoring history that's all "by design." Even if it was on another show.

  • Member

Wow, a psycho veteran. Y&R really would be stealing from ABC with that type of story, wouldn't they?

They can do the Nik/Mary/Emily story for Chance and Chloe. It even had a doppleganger...

Edited by CarlD2

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.