Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4960

  • Taoboi

    4019

  • Cat

    4010

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Rightly so. She has it coming. I have been waiting on all day to get through my work day to visit this thread and see all the brilliant responses here.

Sure have. Robyn is a fraud and is not playing the game of reality TV. 

Spot on analysis on your part and on the part of Candiace. 

I wholeheartedly agree that I stand with Candiace. 

Robyn is monetizing this affair outside of the RH universe and that is a mortal sin.

Robyn should be fired for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's a fraud who exposed herself. That's the crazy thing. Egged on by her equally-foolish BFF on their (free) podcast. And she took a page from the Jen Shah Playbook (because that worked so well for Jen Shah) with "Subscribe to my Patreon to hear more gory details of Juan's philandering da troof!" She really thought she flexed.

Gina Liano Gina Rhomelbourne GIF - Gina Liano Gina Rhomelbourne Real  Housewives Of Melbourne - Discover & Share GIFs

A couple of things:

1. This could all have been done with Bravo's knowledge and blessing. The only way Bravo would give its blessing is if this came out on the show first. So it is always possible that Robyn spilled the beans at reunion. However, there are no rumors that this actually happened (and you know production loves to leak ahead of a reunion). The rumors we got is that it was everybody vs Karen in an effort to get Karen off the show and Charrisse on. 

Please register in order to view this content

 (WHY these women are still caping for Bump on a Log is beyond me).

Moreover, the absolute shock expressed yesterday by Karen, Candiace, Chris Bassett-Hound, Wendy and Carlos King (who would have insider intel) says to me that they were blindsided. (Gizelle/Ashley/Mia have been ominously quiet).

2. Robyn thought this would guarantee her a S8 spot, a plan co-signed by her BFF. 

3. Yet another deflection tactic by the two liars: throw out tawdry details of an affair in order to distract from the legal case in which Juan has been implicated.

4. Juan no longer wants in on the show. He married Robyn (did Bravo even get to televise it?) so that she won't testify at any upcoming legal proceedings. He cannot risk anymore salacious stuff coming out, and he & Robyn have agreed that S7 will be their last. Consequently, Ms. Work-shy is trying to establish a money-spinning, post-RHOP career on Patreon.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. Sunday's episode elicited 1, maybe 2 posts here? Robyn's social media dumpster fire has elicited 2 pages.

Plus, her announcement exposes the contrivance around which this season (and past ones) have been based. Lies and fake stories thrown at the wall in order to deflect from embarrassing revelations. Robyn exposed her husband. Viewers have now concluded that she's been lying about her own situation for a number of seasons. The jig is up.

This is not good for RHOP in terms of carrying on as per usual in S8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I believe it too. She is so effing stupid. Bravo had been waiting years for Robyn & Juan to sh!t or get off the pot. Well, they did both in one go, and now it's a mess. 

Just to recap (and as Chris Bassett tweeted yesterday): It has been a full season of lies perpetrated by her and her buddy. And now she's told the audience that if they want 'the truth,' that is going to be monetised behind a paywall. A non-Bravo paywall. Yeah, I bet Bravo is pissed. Viewers are pissed, too, because we expect 'the truth' to show up on the main, and only, platform -- RHOP. Not on Robyn's budget Patreon account. 

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hooray we made the exact same critique to Londonscribe!!!!!
    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy