Jump to content

Wisner Washam interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

And perhaps she fears that she's setting herself up for, "Well, come back and write the show your damn self then! <_< "/Well excuuuuse me, we all can't be the *GREAT* Agnes Nixon! <_< "-type responses. But it *is* almost exhilarating to hear people in the industry call each other out on their [!@#$%^&*], I was so glad that he just laid it out like that.

Wasn't that "Little Ladies of the Evening" NYT article also the inspiration for Karen Wolek's famous s/l on One Life? If so, that article sure does... get around. ;) ::WOMMMP wommmp:: :rolleyes:

And, is his name pronounced WIZ-ner or WISE-ner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Jesse and Randi has ruin written all over it, just NO. Randi is beyond blah to begin with and we've already had to forgive Jesse for abandoning his wife and son for twenty years, so he finally comes back and cheats on his wife and steals his son's girlfriend?? What are you fools thinking, I guess you really DON'T want us to like the guy. Might as well have stayed dead. The only potential plus is that Randi wouldn't have survived the wrath of Angie (and maybe Jesse wouldn't have either :ph34r: I'm saying, I love Jesse but c'mon AMC, get it together with him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that, ultimately, Agnes is not fond of McTavish's handling of the head-writing duties, no matter what she's said in support of McT's work (such as her unabortion comments). Maybe there should have been a legal advisory from ABC reading "paid comments from Agnes Nixon in support of ABC and Megan McTavish do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ms. Agnes Nixon. Opinions are subject to change without notice. Restrictions may apply. Please see Julie Hanan Carruthers for details."

Anyway, here's why I believe this:

A little over a decade ago, Nixon - without mentioning McT's name - effectively spoke out against Lorraine Broderick's dismissal as head writer (which was done by ABC in favor of McTavish returning). Not to mention that Agnes walked off the team herself when it happened... which ABC desperately tried to keep under wraps (McT in interviews would attempt damage-control with vague comments like "Agnes is still in the fold... we still get her input").

Washam's comments about Megan only validate what I've always heard about her reputation behind the scenes.

As soon as McT was let go from Guiding Light by P&G / Mickey Dwyer-Dobin, she lobbied hard to get herself back on AMC. She really viewed (views?) herself as the authority on what IS All My Children. At this time, she was extremely jealous of Lorraine. It just added fuel to her fire that LB's AMC episodes won the writing team Emmys in 1996, 1997, and 1998. And I never heard how she felt about this in 2003, but I'm very sure she wasn't "excited" to hear that ABC approached Broderick to headwrite AMC before they contacted her.

The one thing I can say about her that some might say stands in contrary to her agression, is how sweet (though not always sharp) she typically was when talking to the press. She was typically very accessible, but that's probably consistent with her need to be recognized.

On the other hand, she did snap at a fan at the AMC luncheon in 1998. The female viewer recognized Megan and asked her why she hadn't given Janet a storyline (at that point, Janet & Trevor were drying up on the backburner.) Megan snitted back that "you can blame the 'other writer' for turning Janet nice. There's not a lot I can do with a nice Janet." To her credit, she did eventually give Janet a story: Watching Harrold, the family dog die.

I'm really anxious to hear more about Washam's take on McTavish. The idea that she drove him off the team - I'm assuming he means his 1991-ish exit, when he was AHW along with LB? Lorraine left for GL around the same time... I wonder if she was "driven away," too. Maybe McT had her eye on the prize even back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember when she joined the GL team, EP Michael Laibson, who was hoping to revitalize the show, called her "the amazing Megan McTavish." That must've really fed that enormous ego. This was coming off her 92-95 AMC run, and I guess she was considered golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Felicia Behr (AMC's then-EP) knew better. Bombs, evil lookalikes, rapes, and sadistic plot devices can only go so far. Megan basically has what I call "her bag of tricks" that she reaches into and inflicts UPON a show's characters. She does not know characters, and therefor is mostly incapable of letting story come out from who they are. They should add the phrase "plot-driven" to the soap opera dictionary, and put Megan's picture next to it.

The only time she has ever suprised me with something unpredictable was when she pulled an unabortion out that bag. I can honestly say I did not see that one coming... but I certainly don't mean that as a compliment to her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know many were turned off by the tonal differences during McTavish's first AMC stint. Though the show was high in the ratings, I know many fans who feel the "real AMC" died in 1991.

There is something very pedestrian about McTavish and her writing, which was also evident in her first stint. She is not a sophisticated soap writer, and does in fact recycle the same bag of tricks from show to show.

I don't know when things went bad between them, but Felicia Behr really praised the hell out of McTavish when AMC won the Outstanding Drama Series Emmy in 1994.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEj86gGd200

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing about McT is that she has Agnes' make 'em laugh, make 'em cry, make 'em wait template down pat. It's obvious from the basic way she structures stories that she trained under Agnes, but that's where the similarities end. Megan's shows are essentially dumbed down versions of Agnes's. Her writing is incredibly plot-driven and given to excess. She goes way over the top, whereas Agnes's stories are usually based on character and almost grounded in some sort of reality. Also, Megan's writing lacks heart. I know this sounds oh-so-corny, but I've always detected a sense of hope and optimism streaming through Agnes's stories, while Megan's stories have always showed negativity and pessimism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She certainly thanked her, but I'm not sure I would call it overwhelming praise. There were brewing disagreements about the direction of the storylines, but from what I know, the straw that broke the camel's back was in April of 1995 when Robin Mattson went to McTavish requesting a re-write of Janet bombing Trevor's wedding to Laurel. She wanted the bomb-plot scrapped because of the real-life OKC bombing. McTavish was adamantly against it, arguing one had nothing to do with the other. Behr sided with Mattson, and Janet didn't go through with the scheme. (There were rumors that McTavish took her argument to the network regarding her creative control vs. Behr's). Shortly thereafter, Megan was out.

As for the Lucci thing that Adam mentioned, I found out years after the fact that Lucci was not terribly happy with the Kendall story. It wasn't a popular history-revision with her, and we all know that she and Sarah Michelle Gellar didn't have a bed-of-roses connection off camera - and some of TPTB felt that her dislike for the plot affected her vibe with Gellar (whether or not that's an accurate perception is anybody's guess). I hadn't heard that Lucci pushed for McT's removal at that time period, but I do know that when ABC first considered recasting Kendall (with who turned out to be Alicia Minshew), TPTB definitely sought Lucci's approval in doing so. So what you heard, Adam, certainly makes sense in that respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now, it can be told, lol.

I figured MMT had something to do with Wisner Washam's exit from the show the second time. It was like, one week, SOW announced she'd be the new HW, but Agnes would remain as "Executive Head Writer"; and the next, "Wisner Washam has asked to be released from his contract - effective immediately."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh God, she's back? I thought those first scenes were well-intentioned but hysterical.
    • More Guiding Light 1976 At dinner the next evening, Grainger tells Rita he still can’t understand why she inherited from his father and he’s hired a lawyer to help him discover what her role was in his father’s death. Telling her he knows she lied to him, he again warns that he will destroy her reputation in this town. As Rita insists she’s done nothing wrong, Grainger, growing even more angry, lashes out, “Ill see you charged with m—”. Suddenly he clutches his head and collapses to the floor. As people rush to help him, Rita quickly slips out of the restaurant. Grainger is rushed to Cedars and treated for stroke. Rita is even more frightened and upset when it appears that he’s going to recover under the excellent treatment and care of Ed, who is assigned as his attending physician, and Peggy, who is a fine specialty nurse. Rita, drawn by an unseen force to his door, is further shaken when Peggy, seeing her, presses her into temporarily spelling her so she can take a short break. Ed is determined to come to Rita’s aid, as she did his, and brings a big steak for dinner to her apartment. But Rita is too unnerved and shaky to even be with Ed, and disappoints him by asking him to leave before dinner, explaining that she’s extremely tired. Ed knows it’s more than that, and is doubly determined to help her out of this depression, but when she starts to cry, he leaves her, as she wishes. Roger, remembering how Grainger fired him from the oil fields for- being a friend of Rita’s, is disappointed to learn that Grainger has come out of his coma and that Ed feels Grainger’s paralysis and inability to talk may just be temporary. Rita is pressed to assist Tim with a spinal tap on Grainger, and is frightened when her presence causes Malcolm’s pulse rate to rise rapidly. His doctors are unable to understand his rapid pulse changes. Rita tells Roger why Grainger is so hateful toward her. While she was his father’s special nurse, Malcolm made physical advances toward her and she fought him off. His father noticed her bruises~and instantly guessed his son had manhandled her. The old man then swore to her he’d never forgive Malcolm for this cruelty. Roger again warns Rita that nobody is to know about his connection with her and with the Graingers. He fears that if Peggy learns about it, she will leave him.  Ed continues to press his concern and support on Rita, and while it helps to a certain degree and she’s grateful, Rita can’t bring herself to tell him what the source of her worry is. Each day, as Grainger rallies a bit more, her fear and tension increase. Finally, Grainger is able to barely murmur, “Lie... father ... Rita,” to Peggy and manages to crudely letter “RITA S” on a pad of paper. Peggy, assuming that Rita has somehow managed to get Grainger to respond, summons her to the hospital in the hope that she can further stimulate him and thus hasten his recovery. But a major catastrophe, a train derailment, - has immobilized the entire area, and Cedars, as well as all local hospitals, is being overrun with patients. Even though she’s off duty, having served her full shift, Rita is pressed into distributing the patients’ medication. Peggy, explaining that Grainger has already had an accidental delay of medication, which could have caused a major setback, must receive his dosage exactly on schedule. The sight of Rita again agitates Grainger, but she finishes her extra duty and returns home, drained and oversensitive as well as exhausted. When the regular nurse does her usual check, she finds Grainger lying over the side of his bed, unconscious. She issues a “Code Blue” call for the emergency team, and Steve, there almost immediately, starts resuscitation and then gives adrenalin, right into the heart, but Grainger is dead. As soon as he hears, Ed rushes to Cedars in amazement. This is all impossible to him, as he saw Grainger’s recovery as a certainty. He immediately institutes an investigation to determine the cause of death. Roger, told by Peggy what has happened, notifies a stunned Rita just before Ed arrives to question her about everything she can remember about the last time she was in Grainger’s room. Rita, unable to understand what’s happening around her, breaks down in tears, crying that she could be responsible for his death. Ed comforts her, assuring her that he’s not blaming her, just trying to find out what happened.    
    • Carly, considering Robin's daughter as a possible daughter-in-law .... I think the technical term for it would be "plotz"! Or to put it another way, the top of her head would explode!  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • What AW stories do you think of as DOOLish? I mean AW, in a very positive way was KNOWN for its comedic elements. From Iris's maid, Vivian, to the naming of plants, to highjinks with Cass, Felicia, Wally & even Lily, plus remember Dee Evans & Tony the Tuna? In a way at one time DAYS had similar with Caliope & Eugene. 
    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy