Jump to content

Jay Leno moving back to the Tonight Show?


JaneAusten

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ugh! There's absolutely nothing in that list of new shows that sounds remotely interesting. All that's missing is a vampire show. And really? The Rockford Files?! Really NBC?!!

They'd be better off bringing back some of the shows they tanked prematurely like Southland. I didn't watch it but the people I know who did liked it a lot. I hope this means Friday Night Lights is back on deck where it belongs. And Heroes needs to die. I say this as someone who loved it but it's time to give it a morphine overdose and let it peacefully go into the "eclipse."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This network is becoming more hilarious with each passing day...

That's not really a solution for me. I hate that spastic, jerky, stop-then-go method: Let's order Southland. No, wait: we're cancelling Southland. Wait: let's give it another shot... :wacko: Same with Leno & Conan... That's a big problem with this network: they just don't have anything resembling a long-term strategy. It's all quick "fixes" that actually aren't fixing a thing, only making matters worse.

As for Heroes — I can only say Goodbye!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I were Conan, I'd see what another network had to offer and RUN. Except ABC, of course. Or maybe they should keep Leno at 11:30 to prove how much the world has changed since he's arrived. Nightline and Letterman will still outperform his sorry ass.

I think this is a bum deal. They should have killed the Leno show or moved him to 8PM.

I feel bad for Leno and the network's innocent bystanders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Not so much because it's my favorite, but I love Nightline and the concept of a show like Nightline in late-night television.

Conan on FOX would be great and so much more edgy. But they would have to stand by him. At least give him two years. But he's proven he can do the late night format, unlike the untested Chevy Chase or Pat Sajak.

I should have proofread what I said...I shouldn't and really don't feel sorry for Leno. I feel bad for Conan and Fallon, their shows having to start a half-hour later.

I think that will kill their shows instead of help them.

No one wants to watch a half hour of Jay's stale monologue. People watch for the guests anyway. The monologue and the Headlines and Jaywalking are filler. And would they still need a live studio audience for a half hour show? Who the hell would want to come see Jay if Taylor Lautner isn't there?

And on the big news weeks, Nightline will perform well. It usually does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Wow, so Gaspin took the idea of taking Leno out of 10pm to Zucker. Gaspin just gained some points with me. Now he needs to pick up the JJ Abrams and David E. Kelley shows and I'll be on the Gaspin bandwagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This Comcast deal just pushed this Leno thing into reality sooner. I think the affiliates threated to used their clout or input to cause some wrinkles in the Comcast acquition. I'll bet if the Comcast thing didn't happen, Jay would have continued at least through the end of season one.

And those NBC shows - yuck.

They need to gut NBC like they did back in the early 80's when they took risks with wonderful shows like Hill Street Blues and St. Elsewhere and Cheers. It really wasn't until the Cosby Show came into play that they really rebounded in a big way but they were slowly regaining momentum and quality before then. But The Rockford Files really? Without James Garner. You name me anyone like him in the current age of actors that could carry that show. That show was him.

But television as changed so much since then. I don't think anyone at NBC has a clue on what they want their identity to be(at least I think CBS and Fox both know - ABC not completely sure) but the landscape of Television is so different, who knows whey they could do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some favorite quotes and comments from the article.

So, the quote itself is a beautiful triple punch to begin with. But -- this being a soap board -- I couldn't help but see the parallels with our dear soaps. Another comment by the writer evoked the same sense of similarity:

That does seem just about right, doesn't it? And it certainly seems to be common to the story that explains why we don't see new soaps, and why the current soaps just get chipped away, disinvested from...and ridden down to nubs.

Well, I for one will miss the broadcast nets for a while...but not so much. Their day certainly seems to be coming to a close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if daytime has been all that interested in their legacy assets. They ignore or behave with barely concealed hostility towards most vets, while trying to push new faces, not getting that this desperation just helps sink them.

I think a comparable situation for news, or semi-news, would be when Good Morning America brought in Kevin Williams and that godawful Elizabeth Vargas (who went on to make that shameful 20/20 piece about Matthew Shepard). They were billed as new faces, replacing Charlie Gibson (who was regarded as old hat by ABC) and Joan Lunden. They were a huge flop, and ABC had to bring Gibson back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another L&O? They were stupid for not giving Trial By Jury more time. It had good ratings on Friday and they haven't been able to come close since canceling that so fast. Then they sacked Criminal Intent and exiled Mothership to Friday. I hope they move Mothership back to a decent night at 10 and SVU at 10 as well. Then hopefully they have one or two good pilots to fill two more nights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy