Jump to content

Ways to save OLTL


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Even if people are tuning in not necessarily to see Viki as their first thought, the presence of the character and actor are no less important to the canvas. There are certain things that can be done - that shouldn't be done - that can destabilize the morale of crew and viewers alike. And as I said in my previous post, Slezak's unique importance to OLTL is either something you're going to get... or that you're just not going to get. But trust me, most viewers DO get it. It would be a catastrophic error in creative judgment. The show would go out on an offensive note... and would arrive at its end even faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think getting rid of Erika would send a message to the remaining longtime viewers that they are no longer needed.

It would be one thing if Erika were some diva who went to the press and raged over story or salary, like Eric Braeden, but she generally accepts what she's given, and she always takes the pay cuts she's asked to take. She's been very gracious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No Erika and Robin, and my heart, my gut investment is gone, and I am not alone on that by any means. I left for Robin before, the character hasn't been the same for me since she returned, nevertheless, those ladies drew me into the show... they're my anchors. I can't say that I'd stop watching altogether, but without the promise of Erika and Dorian, I have a feeling I'd watch every day the way I now watch on slow days, which is with one ear and from the next room while working. Frankly, they cannot afford to alienate ANY viewer, young, old, or in between. There are other ways they can fix the show and slash the budget. No more Jareds, bring back Viki's sons, we got a Kim, no new Stacy. Hell, the recurring and dayplayer characters are some of my favorite. Less contracts. Frankly, OLTL is imo the most interesting soap on the air right now, it shouldn't even have to be fighting for its life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I guess you're right. I'm one of the viewers that doesn't get it. I've only been watching since summer 2008, and all I've seen Viki do is comfort Natalie and Jessica. She must mean alot to the show, so if they did have to slash costs, getting rid of characters that are obviously not working (Stacy), is a step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

It has been said (and from a viewer's standpoint, I can agree) that SEARCH FOR TOMORROW's fate was sealed the minute Mary Stuart (Jo) was no longer front-and-center on the show. Even if Ms. Stuart had passed away during the show's run, or had elected to retire, IMO, viewers would've accepted that a lot better than MS being pushed out b/c TPTB wanted more emphasis on glamour and youth. Don't think the same wouldn't happen w/ OLTL if Brian Frons decided ES was no longer necessary to the show's continued survival. Again, I'm just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Look at it this way: OLTL's ties to its past are tenuous, at best. In fact, depending on who you talk to, or whoever's in charge at the moment, OLTL didn't even exist before 1979. Viki, however, has been the one through-line since its' very first episode, back in 1968. You sever that thread, and you might as well not call the show ONE LIFE TO LIVE anymore, because it won't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The de-emphasizing of Jo started, what, in the 60s? She went from being the main focus of the show to just having stories, then to having nothing at all. Sometimes I think they were lucky to have lasted as long as they did after they started moving away from her and after they could not find a single acceptable recast for Patti in decades. I guess some of the people they brought in to take more story must have been popular, at least initially. I also think soap fans were more patient back then, because that was before they started being treated with such hostility by the networks and the producers.

CBS had such a dominant lineup in the 70s and through too much meddling (LIAMST), or questionable timeslot decisions (like what happened to EON), or wanting to be seen as more hip (like when they got rid of SFT for Capitol), in the long run they damaged a lot of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Primetime shows have been saved and soaps have huge fanbases. I do think if fans could draw attention to the show and it's stories maybe the ratings would go up and they'd have a shot.Something is better than nothing. Imagine the outrage when the shows cancellation is announced. Unlike GL and ATWT, OLTL has some notice. The cast should be out pimping the show as well since the show is making it difficult to get interviews with the cast. Look at DAYS. It IS possible to get the ratings up with no promotion.

When the PGP AOL soap channel aired SFT you could definitely see what an afterthought Jo had become. I only saw her in one story, a cute little murder mystery with Stu, but the writers changed so that was that. It annoyed me that they brought on her granddaughter and killed her off before they had the good sense to bring her daughter back! It just felt so pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hoping RH doesn't come back as the role of Todd. I'm sick of Todd & Blair reuniting for the million time. After Blair spread those legs for Todd next enemy. This couple is part of what cause the fall of OLTL. What they had in the eighties. Viewers aren't looking for in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Chris I get that I just thought your implication that we shoulda all started paying attention when Nelson started his witchhunt was kinda off. But yeah--I agree that people have to stop acting like there's nothing to be done at all. Still a soap that's run for decades being canceled is a very different decision than danceling Jericho after hlf a year or whatever--I don't think just one fan campaign will have the same impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think people are overestimating the damage losing Viki would do. Didn't people think firing Dee and Drake would destroy DAYS? But instead it led the way to a renaissance. Besides, Viki disappears for months at a time whenever ES takes her vacations anyway. The message board hardcores would be pissed if she were fired but the average offline viewer wouldn't know the difference. They might ask six months later where Viki is assuming it was on the air for another six months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it might be the opposite. The message board hardcores may be more likely to be talking about Tea/Todd, or John/Natalie, or Kyle/Fish, or whatever with Gigi and Rex. The viewers who aren't that involved online and just watch because it's something they've done for a long time, they might not have a good reaction to her leaving. She's been a central part of OLTL from the start and her family is still a major part of the show, whereas Marlena and John just had Sami by the time they left town.

Even if it doesn't do any damage, I'm not sure what they'd gain from losing her. I guess they'd get some salary boost, but then they will get that if they cut some of the dead weight they have clogging up the show, people who have been shoved at viewers endlessly for most of the year and helped cause a ratings drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just want to say, to anyone who thinks the secret to Days' success has been firing Deidre Hall and shoving aside the vets and focusing on the youth so the way to get OLTL's ratings up is firing Erika Slezak to hire... I don't know what exactly... to replace her I ask: what about the fact that in the absence of Hall there has been a big focus on Suzanne Rogers' Maggie, another beloved vet character and actress whose time on the show predated Hall and Marlena and is a super popular heroine in her own right to longtime soap fans? What about the fact that in spite of pushing John/Marlena and Steve/Kayla aside they have a big story involving a 25-year-old couple in Bo and Hope (even if it is their marriage coming apart)? What about the fact that Days HEAVILY features several 60+ actors and actresses in John Aniston, Joe Mascolo and Louise Sorel along with another longtime vet in Lauren Koslow?

You can't shove vets aside completely and Days hasn't. Even in their 20s-30s set you have people like Alison Sweeney who have been on this show 15+ years now and while Nadia Bjorlin, Ari Zucker and JKJ have not been around the entire time the last decade, still they would be instantly familiar to anyone who watched this show 10 years ago.

I think OLTL is a great soap, but they already have too few vets/long-term characters as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy