Jump to content

December 7-11, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
But all ABC would have to pay is a licensing fee, am I right? They wouldn't have to pay all the fees to produce the show because essentially they don't own the show. Right? And wasn't it mentioned by posters in the Brad Bell interview that Y&R, B&B and perhaps DAYS all get money from international revenue, which supplement the cost of producing the show?

It would be a costly gamble, but DAYS moving to another network would in the long run benefit ABC or CBS. There'd be the publicity surrounding it, but also DAYS fans are so fierce and loyal that they would follow that damn show anywhere. And even though ABC wouldn't "own" DAYS, there is the potential that bringing DAYS to ABC might boost the numbers of their other two company owned shows. And DAYS, even if ABC would have to foot the entire bill, would STILL be cheaper to produce than OLTL.

DAYS would be stable on ABC now, yes. But I think DAYS' long-term viability is in being surrounded by other shows with similar fanbases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Both NBC and CBS are looking for cheap shows to produce and make money out of no matter how bad the ratings are. Jay Leno like you said is a failure yet it is still making money for NBC. No wonder viewers are going away from the 3 big networks and onto something else. Who wants cheap looking and awful shows on their screens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL. You don't know that. I think a promotional push, coupled with at least a three year commitment would really strengthen CBS' lineup or in ABC's case, perk up the numbers and maybe go head to head with Y&R for #1. Ambitious I know, but DAYS being around more recognizable soap brands(AMC/GH) might improve their numbers. Especially considering that Y&R will probably continue to to trend downward and it's very likely that ABC and CBS do not share the same soap audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My, my, awfully defensive aren't we? I wasn't being hostile...I just wondered why you feel the need to reply to each and every person who suggests that it is possible that "Days of Our Lives" will switch networks by saying "Days won't go to ABC" or "Days won't go to CBS" or "Days won't go..."

I never said you didn't have the right to an opinion, but to constantly say the same thing but just change the network call letters? Just a little overkill, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well NBC doesn't seem to care about that. If they did why are they sticking with it. Perhaps they will end up cancelling The Tonight Show. I have no idea which one is actually doing better. NBC is still perplexing to me. I don't get it at all. Perhaps this is just one big experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy