Jump to content

ALL: "We're Gonna Turn This Show Back Around!"


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Is Chuck Pratt the father of Spencer Pratt from The Hills? It would explain some things.

Wall Street Journal: Soap opera fans are notoriously vocal. How much of their opinions and comments do you take into account when forming storylines?

Jill Farren Phelps: It depends — we certainly pay attention to what the fans say. There was once an old-timer in the business who said, “If they’re mad, that’s good, they’re watching.” Sometimes you have to take into account that the thing that people say they don’t like, is the same thing that’s keeping them glued to the set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand it, too. An enraged audience is an engaged audience. And sometimes fans do echo what others say aloud but not what they really think. Like my great-aunt who used to huff and puff over some neighbor's alleged indiscretions and then park herself by the window in order not to miss any of the comings-and-goings.

However, JFP is also a master of masking what she wants to do behind a lot of "well, this is what the focus groups want" BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is "they're mad" can be very vague. Are they mad because their favorite couple is separated? Or are they mad because their favorite characters have all been killed off and those who are remaining are mob flunkies?

Even JFP went and apologized after the fact for some of her decisions as producer at GL, because she knew they had done damage to her show, and probably knew they'd taken away viewers.

Now we have GH, where viewers have left to the point where even huge promotion for Jonathan Jackson's return and James Franco's appearance did pretty much nothing. Franco's debut actually came with a ratings drop.

They've heavily declined compared to what they were earlier this year. Many of the posters who were once in the threads seem to have stopped watching or posting. I'm not sure how much message board posts say about viewers. OLTL had like a 50 page thread the week Nash died and Dorian took over BE, but their ratings didn't have a huge skyrocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, that's true. Unpopular storyline direction and complete arbitrary removal of popular character/actor from the canvas are two different beasts... and when merged together (JFP's killing off GL's Maureen Bauer and AW's Frankie Frame), things tend to get severely mucked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And yet what's happened with ratings and overall viewership. Nothing. I see GH for example getting the same 1.9 to 2.1's they were getting in the spring. Perhaps that's good that they haven't dropped but I wold have expected a bump up considering JJ's Lucky is back and James Franco has graced the show. I also see a lot of discusson on Y&R and that's hardly translated to viewers. Lots of complaining about Y&R, probably moreseo than any other show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very true. I can't possibly understand the same old, tired comment Don't watch if you don't like it from some people. People who hate what they're seeing, but are watching. Thus contradicting themselves.

Not that I can explain why GH hasn't bled more viewers. I can't. People are obviously very patient. Or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH hasn't bled viewers? The ratings and viewers and demos are down from last year same time. Oddly if you look at Y&R as bad as people say the show is, they have actually lost a much smaller percentage and the demos for them have been relatively stable, in fact I think they've even gained in the 18-49 demo from a year ago. But 6 months from now who know what will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy