Jump to content

ATWT Canceled


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Primetime is the same way.

It doesn't draw the same audience it used to but it still draws a significant audience.

The problem with Daytime is that in it's desperate determination to gain & maintain credibility it ditched everything that made it worthwhile television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't quite know how to reinforce that yes, the stories on these shows have let us down and have played a part in their death, but this is basically it. Like I said on another board, I'd hate to be any body in a position of power at any soap right now. I can feel their pain, except for the jackasses who say stupid things to the press (Frons!). That pressure to get up sagging ratings that are falling inevitably? Oh Lord no. I'm fine right here on this side of the screen.

ETA: Oh, and for the record, CBS had BETTER do the Pyramid remake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well.. maybe since this is ending, they'll actually give her some meat and potatoes for a Storyline? It would be nice. I'm of the opinion that P&G's claim that they are looking for another outlet is just HOT AIR. They don't want to do it anymore, but they don't want to piss off the 3 million consumers that buy their products. Theyr'e LYING, pure and simple. If P&G REALLY wanted to keep ATWT on the air, they could threaten to pull all of their sponsorship from CBS daytime and send it all to NBC, ABC, and FOX. Here's a question, why doens't FOX get ONE soap? I'd think FOX affiliates would appreciate something that has built in viewership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FOX 5 News in NY just did a piece on ATWT's cancellation (with tons of Noelle Beck clips), they had a couple of on-the-street interviews with people who surmised much of the same... reality TV, less women (and as the guy being interviewed emphasized, less men too) home to watch, changing priorities/tastes, et cetera. The reporter mentioned the planned effort to shop the show to a new network, but pointed out the outcome was still grim as GL had tried in vain to do the same. They also flashed a bit of Barbara Bloom's statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Spot on DeeeDee! I was looking at a list of the top ten highest viewed TV episodes of the decade and some of the episodes had 50 episodes. At the very least, maybe 30 million viewers. Now? High rated shows just barely can get 20 million viewers. 9-10 million viewers used to mean cancellation, now it's fine. Ratings are down everywhere. Doesn't mean soaps are dead. Their ratings are still good when compared with most daytime shows. Ellen gets around the same amount of viewers as ATWT last time I checked and look at her profile. The problem with soaps is that nobody cares and they have no champions. We need publicists out getting the word out. We need these actors on the front page of magazines. OK!, TV Guide, Ebony, Essence, etc. We need them on talk shows. We need cross promotion in primetime (look at Alison Sweeney!).

Of course you need quality too, but they could be doing better if they tried. Nobody cares, including the people employed on soaps, so they're sealing their own fate. If it took some budget cuts to get a great PR team, so be it! They'll pay top dollar to get a big "star," but not to save their show. Idiots in charge sums it up perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been saying this forever. I admire what Days is doing in grabbing back some of its lost audience, but it is the exception to the reality of a socio-demographic shift and the many more viewing choices. I readily admit that I get caught up in Law & Order and sometimes to forget that the soaps are on. I think that this is why the networks do not bother to change headwriters and EPs because they believe that nothing can bring back the daytime audience en masse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep.

Soap Execs have no one to blame but itself for it's failure.

Daytime's been a self fufilling prophecy for years because instead of doing the hard work & changing WITH the times as they used to they kept employing quick fixes & tried to enforce unsuccessful formulas on the audience.

The reality is people do watch Daytime even in now it's current sorry state but they lack patience with an industry that sneers at it's own beginnings, acts like diversity is a 4 letter word & treats it's audience with disdain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the truth, and TPTB have been pushing the "more options, more channels, less audience" thing for years, too. People have always wrote that off as an excuse, though. I don't see why. It's not like it's not true.

I have to admit that my non-soap diversion in daytime is usually Murder, She Wrote LOL You get a fabulous murder mystery in just 60 minutes. It's never as emotional as a soap murder mystery or as expansive, but it's just as much exciting and and satisfying as far as TV goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EXACTLY.

It's 2009.

America has a BLACK First Family yet Daytime refuses to invest in minority couples or anything beyond a few isolated individual token characters.

GLBTQ viewers are tired of being fed social interest stories that are dropped once the newness & critical praise wears off.

Women don't want to watch women under 40 being victimized daily or Women over 40 being told they're worthless unless they accept that their lives are over.

Even OUTSTANDING writing can't overcome a lack of commitment & incorporation of social change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will concede that the soaps have done its part to turn off the viewers that they do have with poor storytelling and overall crappiness. However, I don't think that there is anything that any soap can do to stop the erosion of its audience in the long run. Even Days is eventually going to lose its audience gains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I like Margaret well enough in what I've seen of her as Paige - she is green but she has real star power.  I agree about the actor who plays Brian. He's...mostly just there. Not bad but not great.  My main issue is with the guy who plays Owen. He's just not appealing to me. I can believe Nola being obsessed with him, but he's draining to watch.  I'm surprised people objected to the quasi-incest elements as it wasn't anything that new for soaps.  Speaking of Kim, here's a rare episode of an anthology show she did called The Evil Touch.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    •   I get what you're both saying, and I think the show was lucky to have even made it that long, but I think they could have still maintained a certain audience - Second Chances did before the earthquake. CBS was an older network anyway. I think the premise of Knots was still usable, it was more the characters who were a problem - many of the older figures were played out. If the show had done a better job building up its younger cast instead of making so many poor choices in the late '80s and early '90s, they could have kept things going a little longer. 
    • I wish I cared about the homeless lady as much as everyone else seems to. After the nothing burger that was the lawsuit, this just feels like another boring Naomi storyline at Orphy Genes since she has no office.
    • That's great to hear. Thanks. I wish that was more readily available.
    • Just learned that Clifton Davis wrote this song!  I had no idea.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think even if Marland had wanted to write more for Sara/Adam, his hands would have been tied as Robert Milli was one of the actors dumped by P&G due to his age.  From the bits and pieces I've seen of that period, Sara does have a key role in the Carrie plot, and Marland briefly gave her son Tim a more important part. I'm not sure if they just gave up on Tim once Kevin Bacon left or if they never really cared. I did not even know for many years that there was an actor in the part after Kevin...and then not one, but two. The Spauldingfield video on Tim doesn't even show the last actor (Nigel Reed), which kind of says it all. Anyway, I do get the sense Marland has some use for Sara, or for Millette. It's only after he goes that she is dumped. Of course he didn't ever hire her for his other shows, so maybe I'm wrong. (then again he never hired Geraldine Court either and he seemed very fond of her) Ann is an odd character to me as she is a proto-Lillian in being defined by pining for a Bauer brother and being involved in the death of one of their wives. I do wonder what else they could have done with her. She was friends with Diane, wasn't she? They could have had Diane manipulate her against Mike, I suppose.
    • Yassss....come on Maurice and Brandon...give us nothing!!! Wow, their need to develop their craft shone like a blinding light this episode. Brandon in his Martin and Smitty scenes sounded like he was reading and the facial expressions were giving Disney Channel. He did much better against Maurice in the Martin v Ted scenes. Now, Teddd-dyy (Dana's voice) was just flat. I watched the episode just now after reading the comment on here that Maurice needs to stop swaying, and now I can't unsee it. Has it really been this bad all along?  Ambyr carries. I don't need to say anymore. I am kind of excited to see this Kat/Tomas/Eva stuff play out.  Bill is such a dick to Dani. Like that's the mother of your children that you cheated on with your daughter's best friend but you look to take those low blows. Lord! When he said that thing about it being obvious he didn't care about Dani anymore since he was the one that walked out...that was cold. I even felt for Dani. Bill definitely is all over the spectrum. You can see a villain possibly surfacing, but you also see this great father. The elder Duprees move a little funny. I'm wondering what that is all about. Are they just overly protective matriarch and patriarch because they think it's what's best for their family, or are they afraid their secrets will come out or there's something more sinister there. Why would Vernon want to keep that information from Martin?  I hope something interesting comes out of this June stuff, but as of right now, I'm not too invested. It's not helping my interest on Naomi or Jacob either. However, tge actress playing Naomi has comes a long way from day one.   
    • None of the males are taking their shirts off every week, so we know they have some degree of acting skill.
    • Here's what happened on the sophomore slaughterer, rookie breakout, new hotness, and three soaps that week. The Cosby Show - Off to the Races (May 8): Cliff is determined to settle a score with a former track rival. The Golden Girls - The Way We Met (season 1 finale, May 10): Dorothy, Rose, and Blanche reminisce about how they all came to live together. Miami Vice - Sons and Lovers (season 2 finale, May 9): Angelyne warns former lover Tubbs of a bounty put on his head by the son of dead drug-kingpin Calderone. Dallas - Hello...Goodbye...Hello (May 9): An enemy stalks J.R.. Aunt Lil testifies for Ray at the adoption hearing. Sue Ellen tells John Ross that she and J.R. are reconciling. Falcon Crest - Consumed (May 9): Jeff imprisons Maggie. Angela pursues elopers Dwayne and Emma. Chase traps Terry into revealing Richard's link with Miss Jones. Knots Landing - Thicker than Water (May 8): Karen and Abby feud over Lotus Point. Greg and Abby urge Peter to enter politics. Ben packs for Cathy's tour. Mack meets his daughter.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy