Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 12, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You got it. Patty's SO not going anywhere for a long time. This is MAB's homage to Bell's greatest psycho Sheila - only this psycho has a heart and a soul. Sheila really enjoyed tormenting Lauren and was very adversarial. Patty's got the pathos and is capable of doing horrible things, but I don't see her as evil - quite the contrary.

You all read this theory here first - the Dr. will fill in everyone about Patty's past when she comes to GC, will somehow get involved with Jack, try to reach Patty, and somehow Patty will switch places with her and we start all over again. Plus - Patty will be the key to Adam being "outed" eventually.

Speaking of Adam - what a disappointment Muhney is. I just don't like him at all in the role now. I tried really, really, REALLY hard. But there's just no authenticity in his performance. He's not very interesting to watch for such a complex character. And I hope they're not going to try to make him the next Gloria, and draw out years of story before he gets discovered for all his misdeeds - that's an absolutely horrible thought. Cause at least I enjoyed watching Gloria no matter what sort of crazy stuff they did with the character.

When is Victoria getting hot over the head again or moving to France?

Oh and just cause nobody knows/notices/cares - Where the hell is Heather!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understood Sheila. She wanted a baby. She wanted Scott. She resented Lauren. She resented her mother, whom she saw as weak.

I don't understand Patty. She returns to town a businesswoman, apparently made into an extremely competent and together woman all because of medication that we never heard anything about aside from one throwaway line. This after living as a homeless woman for years, and having severe mental breakdowns for years. And then, because of the lack of this medication we barely heard about, she becomes a lunatic who goes around raping Jack, killing dogs and almost killing children.

I feel like they just have Patty do stuff to shock viewers and then add in, "She's crazy, it's not her fault," to keep her going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you CarlD2, Sheila was a much more well rounded character. Mainly because I felt like there was so much more below the surface which they neither explored, nor told us it existed, it was just there. Although this show has enough doppelgangers, I always wish that Sheila had a twin sister that her mother favored.

Sheila and Patty are fairly similar, they both justify their actions because of others. It took place on B&B but I remember when she cut of Thomas hair and told him, she didn't want to kill him but if his granny just kept on pushing, she would have no other choice. Maybe if Phillis had pushed Patty's buttons, beyond just sleeping with Jack, poisoning Summer and feeling justified might have made some sense, but these writers treat us as morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. Considering how uneven B&B was even then (although a lot better than it is today), I was actually surprised at how well they managed to keep Sheila together, at least up to her exit when she left with baby Mary.

After that she started to become kind of flat, because Kimberlin Brown isn't the type of soap actress who can play the generic soap crazy, and the show (Y&R as well as B&B ) had no idea what to do with her.

With Patty and Adam, they don't have to worry about what to do with them. They just keep doing shocking, bizarre, sick things, designed for no other reason then to manipulate viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The limitations of Patty is that she isn't a Machiavellian character - she's very much a wounded bird who just wants to be loved, yet she's volatile. But, as you pointed out, after so many chapters in the Sheila character, she could never be integrated cause she was evil. It's my hope that they find a plausible way for Patty to recover from her illness yet retain her initial cleverness and edge. Like early PHyllis and Sheila, their underdog status with a twisted POV, made them fascinating to watch. And while even I - Patty's numero uno - did not enjoy her denouement, Haiduk is an incredible actress who is worth the investment of yet another look-alike s/l.

And hey - we get her back with dark hair!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy