Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think there was a disconnect between how Marland saw the show and what was onscreen - for me, anyway. For instance, he talks about how funny Floyd is. Anything I've seen of Floyd in Marland's run is very serious. The other comedy character on the show at the time, Katie, also became very serious. He seemed allergic to lighthearted characters. Admittedly, GL did not ever seem to be a show with comedy elements in the fragments available, but Floyd and Katie were the exceptions until his arrival. 

Kelly is a character who probably should have been interesting, what with his obsession over the purity of marriage and life compared to his inappropriate behavior toward Morgan, but the execution isn't really there for me. It doesn't help that we have characters like Hilary endlessly telling us how awesome he is. 

There's generally a lack of trust in viewers in most of his GL run (that I have seen - again I know most of it is not available), which is true for most soaps, but for me did not mesh well with a show as emotionally complex and messy as GL often was. 

My favorite part of the interview is how openly negative he is about GH. That wouldn't happen with soap press in later years.

I think he meant the older actors, rather than just long-term characters, because the firings got a lot of soap press at the time. Barbara Berjer's did anyway as it was part of a pattern across P&G soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

What was Potter's reason for firing Elliot?  Seems like a strange thing to do in the middle of a major storyline. If he disliked her, why not wait until the plot was over and then fire her??  Even contract actors can be fired after every 13-weeks.  

Edited by Tisy-Lish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Basically, Allen Potter didn't believe the ratings justified so much airtime being given to Carrie and her situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Back when Twitter was good, I had the privilege of discussing soap things in private DMs with Patrick Mulcahey, who was Douglas's protege, and this is what he said about what happened: (from my notes which were copious)

Allen Potter fired Jane Elliot & he & Douglas had this huge falling out over it.

And, PJ, I'm not sure whether anyone would have even desired to have Jane Elliot remain after the 3 Carries storyline was taken to its dramatic/logical conclusion. So the idea - which is sheer speculation - that she would not want to stay with the show, isn't it a moot point? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love Jane and her work as Carrie is compelling, but for all the airtime they gave Carrie and that she killed two people (three if you count Jackie), she still felt isolated enough to where they could easily write her out. Shades of what happened with Tangie a decade later (although they barely bothered to write for Tangie).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know. The only tidbit I've ever even heard about Jane's time on GL was when JvD said something like "you never knew which Jane you were getting from day to day". I guess the fact no one really ever seems to bring up her time on GL speaks volumes. 

I do recall an interview Jane gave to SOD after getting fired where she insisted she was going to sign another contract.

I tried looking up the '82 ratings in the '80's ratings thread. It does seem that Y&R reclaimed it's position as the number one CBS soap mid-year. Maybe that's what prompted Potter to axe Elliot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, she of course, has spoken quite a bit about it. She considers it her most remarkable work. And, I don't see a problem with that line from Jerry. Jane was playing 3 alters so not being able to tell who she was any given work day means she was doing her job. Right?

 

If I understand correctly in the story they had not yet introduced the 3rd Carrie. Supposedly Potter cited the ratings. So the creative types may have felt they didn't have the chance to get to a fair point & definitely not conclusion. Like you, I was under the impression it was mid-contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is fascinating! My assumption back then was that Zimmer was Long's muse the same way Elliot and Brown were Marland's muses.

I've been watching Reva's intro episodes. After they get past the "trashy ex-wife blows into town to cause trouble" bit and it becomes about Reva and Josh, I have to say it's very compelling. The scenes between KZ and RN seem real and sincere. Long was very good at writing stories about the past impacting the present.

If there was ever any of that during his tenure, it was down to the actors. Jerry and Maeve were great in their scenes and it's a shame that he didn't give Ross and Vanessa a long-term love story. Instead, he paired her with Ed (sad trombone noise) or had her bouncing around from one affair to the next. It took Long to give her a real love story. Ross was paired with Carrie, and I don't see how that was ever going to be anything but a fairly short-term story.

Too bad the Alan/Rita affair scenes aren't anywhere on YT that I know of, they had great chemistry. One of the things that I thought was a missed opportunity was how Marland built up Alan and Jennifer's youthful affair as this big deal and when they see each other again...nothing. They were always very cool towards each other.

This is so true. The only female characters that seemed to interest him were Carrie and Nola. The Dobsons wrote beautifully nuanced women. If you wrote down on a piece of paper all the things Jackie, Rita, Holly, and Amanda did, you might think, "Wow, what a bunch of selfish bitches." But somehow they managed to get you to feel empathy for them. 

Then when Long came in, all the women became far stronger. It's too bad she had to write out Hope, who was doomed to stay entirely in Alan's sphere under Marland. Even though her exit story was rushed and poorly motivated (Alan went from loving Hope one day to acting like she broke into his house the next) it was nice to see her evolve into a stronger person. Even though I was a fan of them as a couple, her last scenes where she tore Alan a new one for the way he treated her were very gratifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well...that's one way to interpret it. The other might be that Jane was volatile and not exactly the friendliest person from one day to the next. While I don't have a catalog of Jane's interviews over the years, she's never seemed overly chummy with former GL castmates. I believe she said something nice about Jerry after his passing though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As i understand it, Jane signed a 1 year contract. I imagine she negotiated a good salary as she had made a big impression on GH and would be considered a 'get' especially with the thinking that seemed to believe she might lure GH viewers.

The deal was that if all parties were happy, she would sign on for another year.

At the end of that first year Doug and Jane were happy to continue. Carrie would receive treatment and integrate her alters. I guess the conclusion would be bittersweet as Carrie would decide to leave Ross after causing him so much heartache etc

But Allen Potter (and possibly CBS and or P&G)felt that the Carrie story had not boosted the ratings and I'm sure continuing would have meant a pay rise for Jane (as is the norm).

So  Potter exercised his option not to negotiate a new contract.

Doug was pissed and this may have been the culmination of other disagreements with Potter so he quit also. He had already been through this with Gloria Monty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the details, Paul. I started watching Guiding Light in April 1982 when Texas moved to its morning timeslot. I was quickly entranced by Jane's performance and was so disappointed when Carrie was written out in July 1982. And, Donna, all three alters were shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy