Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The Brett/Marian storyline did get a lot of positive attention from viewers and the soap press. Frank Beaty was fantastic and I doubt most people could have named storylines that were going on at the same time if they had not already been named. That was the storyline everyone was talking about. That was the storyline the show only cared about.

As for Khan's comment about it being transphobic, I understand that concern. It's not something I thought at the time. I just thought it was another violent and sexist storyline from McTavish. I was riveted by Beaty. He sold it whereas I was horrified by a similar story on AW with the Fax newman/Courtney/rape/Frankie's murder storyline that was told soon after. I remember a lot of people seemed to enjoy Lucy being terrorised because they did not like the character and that there was glee in the press that Brent was dressing up as JFP. It reminds me of when Turner Classic Movies looked back at Psycho and talked about the film in terms of transphobia and that's also something that never occurred to a lot of viewers because their focus was elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I tend to agree. Looking back now, I can see that reading. I didn't at the time. This was also a time where very transphobic material was at center stage - the same year the story took place, one of the highest grossing comedies had the lead character vomiting after realizing he'd slept with a transwoman. I don't say that to excuse the story. If people see it as transphobic, especially given the current climate, I understand why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just checked dates & was surprised how early in her tenure it was, which just makes me mad all over again. She was there 1996-2005. Zas became symptomatic in 1997 & died in Dec. 1998. Cross out mad & insert furious. What was P&G thinking!!! Answer: Clearly they were not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I watched GL in real time (Spring 1989-Summer 1992) I thought Maureen Garrett was one of the most beautiful women on daytime and she was in her 40s then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Thank you all for the info and your thoughts - very interesting indeed!  I'm curious - I looked at the Daytime Emmy award winners/noms from that year when Frank was nominated for Best Supporting, and the winner was actually Jerry (Ross).  Was Ross part of the same storyline or a different storyline?  And if different, was that just an example of amazing performance in a crappy or boring storyline?  Or was the timing off there?

Edited by alwaysAMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I remember the big favorite for 1996 Supporting Actor was Michael Sutton. The rest of the race was Ian Buchanan, Stuart Damon, David Forsyth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Ross wasn't involved in that story. His main story was based on the return of his wayward daughter, Dinah, who had a lot of conflict with his new wife, Blake. And his ex, Amanda Spaulding, returning to win him back.

You can see the reel that won him that Emmy here:

Please register in order to view this content

Yes. There was an uproar when Jerry beat Michael. To me Michael was not a supporting actor, although that rarely matters with awards shows (as shown with the Oscars yet again this year). I assume Jerry won because he was so respected in the industry, had won the year before, and also just beaten cancer in those few years. Either way, I was glad he won. He could have won ten Emmies and I would have been happy for him.

They burned through good will ASAP with that hideous mess and Allyson Rice-Taylor's firing at ATWT (I am not comparing the two in severity). A shame because many were initially very glad for the changes. And that was the last time P&G even tried.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Please register in order to view this content

I tried to convert it. Got video but lost audio. Sorry. Gimme a few & I'll summarize.

 

This is supposedly Jerry's reel. I hope it will play. If it doesn't we'll go to Plan B. I just watched it. Whole scene Moniz & Jerry but boy is he plenty mad at her.

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for linking that!!!  

Please register in order to view this content

 

Thank you too!  It's weird because the video wouldn't play in the original post, but when I started to quote it, the video came up in the reply so I could watch it.  Thank you both!  Jerry is a great actor for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I haven't rewatched it since it aired, but I recall the Brent story being well-received. Sure, it was a rip-off of Psycho, but daytime had never shied away from ripping off the movies. Thinking about it, I wouldn't doubt it was trying to tap into the uptick in horror/slasher movies in the '90's.

It is ironic for someone to diss how crappy the actors writing could be, when she was a dayplayer actress turned writer. I mean, for a writer, she sure played the part of an ex-hooker slinging beers well.

I mean, how can you not write something better for Holly than a dull romance with the duller than dirt Fletcher? I mean, c'mon. Every other vet in that age range got a younger lover to goose their story. The only one it didn't really work for was Ed, and that was part of the fallout from Maureen's death no doubt.

I do want to add that even though I loathed Nadine, and don't think much of Jean Carol's acting, McTavish did her dirty. What's an actor supposed to say? "I'm happy over here playing 4th banana with nothing really to do?"

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She did mention that she had acted for years and always just put up with the writing, no matter what, which is why she thought other actors should do the same. 

(of course those actors were bigger than she ever was)

I think the story with Fletcher and Holly made sense initially, as she was going for the complete opposite of her relationship with Roger, but they never should have had a child. The initial story was powerful, but there was zero future for Holly with Meg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do find it curious that she either had nothing to say about Pam Long, or hadn't gotten around to dishing that dirt yet.

Yeah, the Meg story reeked of GL trying to do a social issue story, and not having the guts to commit to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy