Jump to content

AMC: The Moving/Not Moving Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Sorry, you are delusional ;) With all respect--I REALLY don't want the show to leave New York but... The writing was on the wall. Frons or whoever obviously convinced the network this was happening and, honestly I don't think Canary and Lucci coulda stopped it. They have loyalty to the show, obviously even with some weak writing still love their jobs--and the lesser paid or famous actors obviously also want a STEADY acting job. To think they shoulda stood out against this--especially in the current work environment is INSANE--these are working actors and actors are, frankly, used to moving around to find work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 672
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

his column is getting worse and worse. I know AMC has not been its best lately but hsi blind HATRED for it (and his huge love for Y&R which I don't think ahs been brillian tthe past two months) drives me crazy.

that said I agree. I loved AM back in the day, and Kendall and even Zach but they have been SOO played out on the show for me that I'm finew ith them leaving the show at least for a coupel of years ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just hope we get a good 40th annviersary and it's not forgotten in the movie :(

At least that blurb makes me think James Mitchell isn't as sick as I was worried he was? At any rate I still hope he gets a proper sendoff\

And I agree with those who say NBranco saying Ray M made close to a million a year is complete BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me too. Maybe with Franco slumming Sarah Michelle Geller (who, let's face it, has had a pretty crap choice in what roles she takes post Buffy) will return ;)

Branco calls AMC the worse show on TV. Now i knwo th eman has an adolescent delight in speaking in exagerations but as a long term AMC fan it's not even the worse AMC has been (Passanante's solo term, and Rayfield, and some of McTRavish's last era--not to mention th eeternal boredom of Brown/Esensten were less watchable) and keepign an eye on all the soaps it's also far from the worse currently on air. I'mn not saying it deserves praise--it needs a lot of changes, but the way he bullies it is just ridiculous. Now he's boycotting the show and not covering it (on a MAJOR site like TVguide.ca no less) because ABC is keeping it and cancelling OLTL? I love OLTL, I'm a fan, but such pettiness is beyond stupid--and pointless! It'll do no good and just comes off as childish. And he claims to be a journalist? Oh please--even if you HATE the show to complain about a job where you have to watch AMC for 40 mins a day as being too much is insane. And the ultimate joke is NOTHING official has been said about OLTL and won't be said for MONTHS to come. Talk about jumping the gun.

Branco has NEVER been an AMC fan--it's obvious even in its glory days it was never one of his shows. Fair enough--but the only reason he calsl it the worse show on TV is because he's so desperate to get it canceled over OLTL

This does make me sad though: "Ouch: Recurring actor Daniel Kennedy found out he wasn’t welcomed in L.A. by reading ABC’s press release! "

I wish they'd realize what AMC needs MORE of is smaller but important characters like Pete, Opal, etc that give the show a sense fo comedy and community like it once had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The irony is that I think AMC will still end up losing most of its big stars but now they'll lose them gradually. I'm not saying that's necessarily a bad thing either. Actually the fact that they've lost Kaye and Minshew shows just how much of a good thing it could be. This could be the reset that the show desperately needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree. ABC is so convinced that their soaps have to revolve around these popular actors/characters. Yet Days was able to move on from John and Marlena. AMC should take the opportunity to do the same. Pratt can tell fresh more balanced stories giving more characters airtime. OLTL and GH would also benefit from losing it biggest stars. OLTL without Todd and John and GH without Sonny, Jason and Carly would be joys. The audience would still watch as along as the stories were solidly told. I suspect that CBS/Sony/Bells are about to learn this lesson when Eric Braeden is gone for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been saying that for the longest. The whole concept that was introduced 2 months ago when the relocation was announced that the show would DIE without this actor or that character is nonsense. What's the difference between a poorly written show with these actors front and center 5 days a week while taping on the east coast... and a poorly written show without those actors? Nothing. It's still a poorly written show no matter where it's taped or who is acting on it.

If the show tells entertaining (not even "good") stories, then the audience will remain. The only reason I tuned out of AMC for almost a solid year was because B&E made the show so dull that I wasn't even entertained. I simply didn't care. The upside to Pratt is that I care. Do I enjoy the particular stories and treatment of characters? Nah. But do I have some kind of investment where I tune in and get myself riled up and want to post as soon as I see the nonsense? Yes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with marceline, that's just what I was thinkling... they're moving or commuting now, but now doesn't mean forever, doesn't even mean six months from now. For some reason it's Canary and Morgan who I wonder about in particular, moreso than Lucci even. I've also wondered if TPTB have made addendums to the contracts of those who will be continuing with the show. I know that they were all *generously* offered the choice to move or not, but I don't know what kind of legalese is in those contracts that could potentially help or hurt their decision to leave the show based on this cross-country trek, I mean doesn't this move qualify as a breach of the original contract or does ABC have its ass totally covered? Is it crazy to think that some of the actors have had their lawyers and representation approach ABC about adding things to their contracts protecting their clients in the event that the move doesn't agree with them and they want to get out of their contracts early?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm inclined to remember the case of Genie Francis. She was under contract with ABC, living in New York, doing the character of Ceara on AMC, which she enjoyed doing because of the whole incest survivor storyline she was given with that character and doing theater on Broadway at night. ABC basically said "You're worth more money to us as Laura Spencer than as Ceara Connor," and fired her from All My Children and was "forced" to move back to Los Angeles to do GH. She didn't want that, but she was under contract and basically had no choice unless she wanted to contest it. So, what I'm able to gather is that no matter what show the actors are performing on, it's by ABC that they're employed -- not the actual show. Writer Michelle Patrick's In The Zone interview revealed that Brian Frons called her up to say, essentially, he's taking her off GH's writing staff and moving her over to AMC's. Yes, I know, being a writer is different than being an actor for an ABC soap since writers don't have to move to the area the show is taped, but the ideology is the same. The network has the right to say "You work for us, and we want want your services over here, now, instead of over there. Now, if you choose not to go, we'll happily buy you out and replace you. But if you choose to go, you're more than welcome!"

With my ignorance of the legalese of these contracts completely accepted, I don't know whether or not there could be an argument based on the fact that these actors who are east coast based signed on to the show with the idea that the show would continue to be east coast based... and that if they knew there were a possibility at any time they could be required to go to another locale, they probably wouldn't have signed. But I'm prone to think that ABC has their asses covered, because they've dealt with actors, such as Ty Treadway, who commuted from LA to NYC to be Colin/Troy on OLTL every week. And even 25 years ago when Dorothy Lyman was taping her scenes as Opal in New York and flying out mid-week to Television City to tape Mama's Family on NBC. I'm sure the legal department at ABC made sure they were covered and had the upper hand before they made the final decision to relocate the AMC production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gotcha, makes sense, thanks for your response. Yes, GF was really upset about the Ceara/Laura thing, sure they made her a star, but damn if they haven't been putting girl through it for almost 30 years now.

I know that business and business, but I really hope that the actors' best interests are seriously being taken to heart here. In other words, please don't invite me to move and fire me three months from now. HEATED! It looks like they're trying their best to take care of all that now (

), but from experience, the last thing you want to work around is a group of cranky actors who feel like they're being yanked around and taken advantage of. The whole "You should be happy just to have a job" thing will only take you but so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Debbi Morgan has spent enarly all ehr time while not on AMC or Loving/City based in LA (and not just during her brief Port Charles stay) so I'm not concerned about her. Canary I am a bit more--wasn't the gossip in the Spring he wanted to work less? Still, with less and less soap work in NYC, and actors prone to moving around for their work anyway, I'm not too worried about people moving to LA and suddenly deciding they can't leave NYC (tho I sure know I'd rather live in NYC...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy