Jump to content

Y&R- #7 in Internet Streaming


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Through plays on ABC.com, "Lost" accounted for 36.4 million total video streams -- a tally that includes views of full-length episodes, clips and video podcasts related to the show. "Grey's Anatomy" was No. 2 with 29 million streams. Compared to the same stats from March, "Lost" was up 13% while "Grey's" climbed 57%. ABC noted that "Lost" has been the top dog among vid streams for five consecutive months.

Rounding out May's top five were ABC's "Desperate Housewives" (14.9 million streams); NBC's "The Office" (14.5 million); and ABC's "Dancing With the Stars" (13.1 million). CBS' "NCIS" was No. 6 with 11.6 million streams, followed by the Eye's daytime soap "The Young and the Restless" (11.5 million) and "Survivor" (11.1 million). ABC's "The Bachelorette" was No. 9 with 9.1 million. "Gossip Girl" rounded out the top 10 with 8.4 million.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111800494...d=1009&cs=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

WOW!

No, it is hard to make a lot of sense of that streams number...but if we average it over approximately 20+ episodes a month, and PRETEND that it means "unique users watching at least some of the show" (that's a bit of a stretch, but lets pretend), that means we can add about 500,000/night to the show's total US viewership.

That number isn't far off from the Soapnet tally.

So, combining those two sources, we're seeing a 20% increase in Y&R's viewership over the CBS tally each day.

The trick, of course, is to make that extra million nightly on-line and Soapnet viewers generate as much income, per viewer, as the TV broadcast. Hopefully, that is close.

Thank you so much for sharing it. The Y&R numbers are good, but not nearly as impressive as, say, Lost. Why? Because (during the season) Lost gets those eyeballs with ONE episode/week, but Y&R needs five times as many shows to generate a smaller number of eyeballs. Still, I'm happy to see signs of life in the old girl...especially in the new media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you figure in the Soapnet and streaming numbers, as a reflection of a total US viewers, Y&R is actually back up to where it was YEARS ago.

If you estimate that Y&R total daily views is approximately 6 million with these figures, that maps onto the ratings that the broadcast-only got about a decade ago, right?

So many variables here. If Y&R has held onto substantial viewership by moving into new media, in the face of a broadcast industry and a daytime genre that are in general decline, it says there is genuine hope -- contingent on monetizing these alternative viewers -- for viability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is the most impressive is that Y&R is CBS' SECOND MOST STREAMED SHOW!

For a show belonging to a so-called dying genre this is great news. And now we know why CBS.com is actively featuring Y&R in it's streaming links on the front page.

This survey also shows that viewers of serialized drama are more prone to try online streaming than those of procedurals which on the other hand do much better with network repeats. This still means for ad dollars for the networks but maybe online streaming will close in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Wow that's pretty awesome for Y&R.

Yup. As network ratings continue to drop, other venues will increase. People still want to watch soaps, but they find easier ways to watch soaps. I pretty much watch all my soaps/tv shows online now.

For Canadians, CTV.ca just started streaming B&B. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that raises the other point, one that came up in the ratings thread.

If you figure Y&R is getting at least 6 million views a day (all sources) in the US, and B&B is doing well on-screen and online, we already have signs of strength. Add to that the international distribution dollars (which seem to be strongest for these two soaps), and we really have the only two soaps CLEARLY positioned to survive in this dreadful market. That doesn't make them invulnerable, and that doesn't mean the attrition won't kill them...but it does mean that by being proactive with different forms of US distribution and international distribution, they have carefully worked not to put all their eggs in one basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy