Jump to content

Examples of SORASing messing up timelines


Recommended Posts

  • Members

They are thinking of Making Spike be 8. Miranda and Little A were Born on March 24 2004. Miranda and Little A are 5. Bianca went to Paris and then came back to Erica and Jack's Wedding in May 2005. Bianca went back to Paris and I think it was the Next Time She came back to Pine Valley that Spike was Born. This was when Kendall was in the Coma. Emma is 6 and Emma was Spike's Big Sister. I don't know for sure, but I think Spike is around maybe 3 and Ian is 1. It may be Spike is 4 and Ian is 2. I'm not sure about Their Ages. Now, Kendall will go home and say Why is This 8 Year Old Boy doing in My House and Spike will say Mommy and Kendall will say I'm Not Your Mommy. Sorry about the Run On Sentence. Jody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Technically DAYS took Shawn down in age. Wasnt he born about the time Bo and Hope left the show in 1987. I remember he was just an infant then. If I recall correctly, Belle was born in 93 or 94. Technically Shawn D should be in his early 20's and Belle in early teens. But somehow they're the same age and married..........hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very good points here. I actually wish they never aged and de-aged any characters on soaps. Not only would things be more realistic and credible, I think having the continuity of aging in real time would keep more viewers tuned in because they can see their characters literally grow before their eyes. I mean really, how stupid is it that Nick Newman was born in like 1988 and has a 16 year old son in 2009? So absurd.

Also, in regard to your age on Jill, I believe Jill was 18 in 1973, so she would have been born in 1955, making her 54 today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shawn D was born April 6, 1987 about 6 years before Belle was born in 1993. Brady was born in 1992, but now he is older than Shawn.

But they had done the same thing with Melissa and Hope years before. Melissa was always older than Hope and then all of a sudden Hope was 1 year older than Melissa.

What I have always found funny is that the British soap writers are talented enough to write without SORASing, but US soap writers can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The new Summer is definitely 5 or 6,which makes it strange that the Nick and Sharon repeatedly stated that Cassie died 4 years ago.

With all the messed up timelines,I wonder why they were so specific about that?

Usually,they say stuff like 'all those years ago' etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with those who say that SORASing is lazy storytelling.

Sometimes it is just not needed. Look at Noah on Y&R, for example. There was no need for him to be this old. Especially since they barely freakin' use him. He was just fine as a little spoiled brat.

Writers need a reality check and maybe they'll understand what the real world is about, and that they are missing some juicy years to fast-forward to their silly teen-pregnancies storylines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Julie's not a great-grandmother yet (as far as we know - the most recent version of Scotty Banning was old enough to have a few kids by now) but she is a step-great grandmother to Claire who is also her great-niece.

But yeah if Ric Hearst had stayed on as Scotty Banning I imagine he would have had a few kids who would have been Sorased themselves and now be old enough to have their own lmao. Maybe thats why they never attempted to bring Scotty Banning back, because TPTB realised that the SORASing had gone a bit too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I thought about that too... if Ric Hearst were brought back, they'd already have him have a 20-year-old son. It's bizarre how they so rapidly aged Julie's character, and thus abruptly ended storyline potential for her... the show began with her as a 16 year old in 1965 and was the grandmother to a teen by the late 80's! Meanwhile, Alice is about to celebrate her 150th birthday?

Speaking of former roles of Ric Hearst, wasn't GL's Alan-Michael Spaulding rapidly aged from being born roughly in 1981 to being a teen by 1987? But Amanda Spaulding was already an adult in the late 1970's, yet by the mid-90's, Amanda and Alan-Michael were only a few years apart? (Which reminds me... Shouldn't Alan Spaulding be in his 80's?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy