Jump to content

Examples of SORASing messing up timelines


Recommended Posts

  • Members

On AMC Jake Martin is talking about when he thought he was Colby's father when she was being born. In real life this was around ten years ago but since Colby was SORASed from like 6 to 15 in 2006 and is now around 19 how young was Jake when Colby was being born if Colby is now 19? What are some more examples of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

According to the new timeline Jake would have been around 19 or 20 which is the age he was involved with Emily Ann and pining after Julie I think. LOL

*************************************

One of the biggest examples is Kendall herself which has thrown off the whole AMC timeline. Erica is no longer the counterpart of her rival Tara, but is the age of her adopted brother Tad. Also the new timeframe would have made Erica about 13 when AMC premiered.

Also Kendall is supposed to be older than Charlie who was born when several years after Kendall's supposed birth.

If Charlie ever returns to the show they will either totally ignore that or Charlie will have to be around JR and Jamie's age now which will make him even younger than his own sister Kelsey who was born about 9 years after him on the show.

Which is why I think we will never see Charlie Brent again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On GL, Rick and Mel Bauer have a child who was born in 2003 (?) and who is now entering college or in college. Not only was this ridiculously pointless, as she has never had a storyline that I can recall, but she is now older than Daisy, who was originally born in 1986 and was about 11 or 12 when she came to town in 1998. Then when Daisy returned to town around 2006 or 2007, she was only around 16 years old. None of it makes any sense to me.

On ATWT, Ellen Stewart was a teenage girl in the late 50s. She had a son, Dan, she gave up for adoption. A few years later, she married the adoptive father, David. David had a son, Paul, with his late wife. By the late early 70s, both of these boys were in their early or mid 20s. Ellen became a matriarch, and Ellen's mother Claire should now close to being a great-grandmother, in spite of her not being that old. Claire was abruptly killed off and I assume as a gift to Barbara Berjer for this confusion, she was moved to GL as Barbara Norris. In the early 70s, Ellen and David had two daughters, Dee and Annie. By 1976 or 1977, both of these girls had been aged to around 18, which must have made Ellen seem geriatric, and I wonder if that's one of the reasons why Dan, who was now also pushed into an older age bracket, was killed off.

Tom Hughes, who was born in 1961 or so, returned to town in the early 70s as a drug-addicted Vietnam veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Leah " I refuse to call her a Bauer Boudreaux" is the worst rapid aging in the history of daytime. The girl literally went from a 3 month old baby to a teenager over night. :angry:

Leah has now leaped ahead of her big brother Jude, cousin Robbie,Zach,Emma,Clarissa,Kevin and James marler,Maureen and Will. All of those kids were born before her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is why ,overall I am against SORASing.

If a few years were added here and there ,and it was consistent,it would be OK.

Instead,we get these drastic changes,which suddenly make all the older characters way older than they should be.

It is just lazy storytelling.

Days was bad when Julie's son David was aged.He should have been about 7 and was aged to early 20's.It limited the stories for Julie,especially a few years later when she became a grandmother.It made Alice a great,great grandmother.

Days had Sandy Horton and Steve Olsen as core family members in the younger age group,but they were never used.It also meant that by the mid 80's,David was considered useless,when,instead he should have been emerging as a major character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EJ is the biggest example I can think of currently on the Days canvas. EJ was born in 1997, but yet he's the same age as Sami/Eric, Lucas, Carrie, Brady etc...

Phillip was born in what 1995 or 96? But is the same age as Belle and Shawn and that crowd...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get most annoyed when characters are aged from adolescents to early 20s. Why skip all those rich years with them as teenagers causing hell for their parents? It seems so short sighted.

UNLESS it's to match them up to others on the canvas that they'd conceivably be peers with, like Chloe on Y&R. I don't mind that we missed most of her child and all of her formative years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that one of the worst SORASing was done to Heather Stephens on Y&R.

I remember her as a baby while Paul and Nikki were still at high school.

Now Victoria was born a good 5 years after April left town with Heather to go to NY.

Fast forward a few year's April returns to Genoa City with a 12 year old Heather, but Victoria was a good 5 - 7 years older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that is when SORASing looks worse is when they allow some to grow up on screen and SORAS others around them.

OLTL did that with Jessica for the most part and now with Starr.

Secret Storm did it with Amy keeping Jada Rowland in the role for years.

It just makes things look worse when it is not applied equally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy