Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I read the Monday transcript. I think it is the Restless Style photostudio (although they don't actually say that), dressed up as a French hotspot

We have seen that back room a few times before:

- Vince Gill (?) song

- Katy Perry photoshoot

- Men we Love photoshoot

Usually, we've seen only parts of that room, because of backdrops being used for the photoshoots.

I think this time they used the whole room, "dressed".

But isn't it ODD that they would use this new space and all...and not mention where it was?

ETA: This is the transcript from Friday's show that made me think, somehow, that it was the Restless Style backroom. But it is very indirect. This happens right after Nick and Phyllis arrive at the reception:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reveal worked on several levels.

If you were just watching at home,spoiler free,you would have seen the flashback and be shocked at Cane's deception,not knowing who 'Langley' was,or blown away by 'Phillip's'appearance.

I'm sure many long time viewers,watching live,would have thought'who is that...i recognise him...by then he was offscreen and they would be dying for Monday to confirm what they saw.

I wonder what the follow through will be Monday.I know that sometimes,there is no mention on a Mon of a Fri cliffhanger,which surely goes against the basic rules of storytelling.

With all these cast additions,the canvas is getting unmanageable.As it is,important beats are not being played,so it is worrying how everything will be shared out..

Did we see a Nina/Cane scene?There need to be more converastions,where characters discuss their feelings,rather than viewers having to work out motivations for ourselves,especially when things are not making sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So how is this going to work? Phillip III (Bierdz) died when he was 18, so if that kept it in real time, he's 40. When Cane arrived they established that he was 30 or 31 (using the real 1976 birthdate). Also, how would Phillip III known about Kay's baby switch? Kay was having those dreams and then remembered the truth. This makes no sense. I forget did Jill and Cane have a DNA test (not that it matters after the Kay/Jill double test undone by the three test they did this year). This could end up being a total mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only explanation I've come up with until now is that the character played by Bierdz sent Cane to Genoa City to become a part of Jill and Kay's life, and therefore have an in. Nothing sinister, perhaps, just a way to keep tabs on them and make sure they're alright. If it is Phillip and--for some reason--he is still alive, he could have relocated to Australia, started a family, and is in someway related to Cane. Though the Uncle isn't something that can easily be thrown away.... at this point, I feel it would be much much better if TB is NOT Phillip, and if he's just playing a new character. It would save us the Phillip ressurection mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they have Thom Bierdz back, he should be playing Phillip III, and no one else. What's the use? At this point, I can look past his resurrection, given that the whole Cane situation Latham created made no sense in the first place. I'd rather a resurrected Phillip III be the real Phillip III than Cane or someone else. They could've fixed it without resurrecting him, but oh well, I guess this will do for now, as long as there aren't too many holes in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I just am trying to find an explanation that would avoid a disaster... I just don't see any plausible way of bringing him back--so, please MAB, do surprise us!

But, that's it... changing who Cane is is the easy part... but the return from the dead. I just shudder. They'll undo LML's mistake and risk creating an even bigger one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Returns from the dead can work, it just has to be well-planned, but who knows what the plan is for this story. For all we know, Phillip III could have faked his death and planted a body to escape the life he was never comfortable with, even if it meant abandoning his son and wife.

This could either be an emotionally compelling story, or just cheap and sleazy. I just hope they thought it out well and know what they're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to someone pages back,Bill Bell regretted killing off Philip.That may be true,but Bell lived with his decision and didn't do 'back from the dead'.

This will be interesting in the short term as to how the whole thing is explained,but long term???

Will this signal the end of Cane?Assuming he has a 3 yr contract,Goddard is signed up till next Jan.Of course,he could be written off at any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy