Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Thanks. I see Denise Alexander has her special credit at the end of the roll by this time.

It seems so strange that Mac would have invited Reginald to this event, especially with Vince and Mary. Maybe it was explained in the story that they had invited Peggy and Peter but Peggy brought Reginald instead? I seem to recall Peter was also a suspect, so it would be important not to give him an alibi by having him in the room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure whether Edge of Night aired in my area. I was completely unfamiliar with Forrest Compton and Ann Flood as well as Sharon Gabet.

Alfred and Vivian just dropped in and out so it didn't seem like there was any long-term plan for them. They didn't even come to Adam and MJ's aborted wedding. Rose seemed like she might have more to do -- she turned out to be Sara Montaigne's mother -- but nothing materialized. 

Edited by Xanthe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. Until my grandmother died two years ago, she always brought up Quinn's death when talking about AW. It bothered her that much. Execs always think that viewers want to see the next new things, but that's not usually the case. It's why Tracy Chapman and Joni Mitchell stole the Grammys because of the connection and history viewers have to those women. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's so true, and such a poignant story.

Quinn, and Petronia, also fit AW so well - that's how the character survived as long as she did through so many regimes. Much as I enjoyed her time at GL, I would have traded that for her getting to be on AW longer with some writers who might have tried to use her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Quinn was an attractive intelligent woman of color (played by a fine actress)who, through sheer luck I think,became one of the longer term characters at that point.

She had yet to wed so there was a lot of story possibilities open to her. She had an adopted daughter and grandchild so that story avenue was there along with business and romance potential. And she was a good friend to several characters. So the writers decided to drop her. Makes sense.

That continual revolving door of characters was one of the fundamental mistakes AW made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's exactly what makes killing off Quinn such a great move in a serial killer storyline. It was shocking. It got people talking. It made people think that if they can kill off Quinn, they can kill off anyone, which gave the rest of the storyline harrowing stakes! Like killing Mark during the Sunset Beach serial killer. I'll say it again: there's nothing more boring than a serial killer storyline where only non-essential peripheral characters are the victims. See Santa Barbara's carnation killer. Snooze fest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's good to get people talking, but it shouldn't be at the expense at creating shock moments that don't support longterm engagement. When you kill off the main AA female character, you're killing off years of potential story. I don't necessarily think we need serial killer storylines. They inevitably devolve into foolishness as AW and SBeach did. The serial killer storyline wasting time with chasing around Crystal Gayle? I saw this storyline years after it happened, so I don't know what people felt like at the time, but I think it would have been more interesting if the reveal of the AW killer was someone important, and that the big part of the story was the fear. Nancy's role in the storyline was intriguing, but that also fizzled out since Cameron left the show. In hindsight, it would have more interesting to kill off Nancy or put MJ in the story and perhaps she could have died and that would have given storyline. Maybe others who watched at the time felt/feel differently, but I think killing off Maisie and Quinn was silly, and the longterm storyline possibilities out of the storylines were largely ignored. 

Edited by chrisml
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disliked them killing off Maisie and Quinn but the Depriest era had already killed off Sally and Zane and written off a bunch of other characters with or without fanfare. Maisie had always been a supporting character and Quinn had been marginalized over time so it wasn't surprising that they were on the chopping block.

The only reason they had boyfriends at the time was for the storyline purpose of bringing them to the attention of the Sin Stalker. And the Sin Stalker apparently escalated from killing prostitutes to killing respectable single and not especially promiscuous middle-aged women. I don't think Quinn was even sleeping with Zack, was she?

The Sin Stalker was also terrorizing respectable young women who even thought about dating -- or in Lisa's case obsessing over her as a perfect virgin and rejecting her as spoiled when she told him she had been raped.  The Sin Stalker's pathology was really all over the place.

I would rather have seen Nancy on the canvas as a foil to Amanda in the future so I would not have wanted to kill her off. I wish they had brought her back -- she could have been recast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously, the argument of having a soap serial killer murder being a more exciting story when they kill a significant character versus lamenting the loss of a popular actor is an age-old argument that cannot be settled.  I usually fall on the side of the thrill of the unexpected exit trumps the sorrow over the potential of the character.  As a viewer, I would rather watch a surprise cliffhanger, because it causes the visceral reaction that keeps me hooked on a story.  And the issues of long term potential, are only valued in hindsight, which was unknown at the time the plot was devised. 

In this case, Ms Paley was excellent in the role, and the character was a rare case of a well-rounded professional Black woman on soaps.  But, I don't feel like it is the duty of a production to continue a character that does not inspire a writer, when the actor could move on to other jobs that would be more satisfying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's as much about duty as what can be for the health of the show. AW had so much writing turnover that what inspires one of many writers doesn't really stand out, especially since in many cases those who were brought in were often brought in more for name value than inspiring the writer (Larry Lau, Denise Alexander, Sharon Gabet, Chris Robinson). The Sin Stalker era is so plot-driven and the characters are so flat it's hard to know what characters inspired the writers anyway. 

In theory, killing off a regarded character could be a jolt to a story (like the Loving murders), but AW had already killed off and written out so many only the year before, I'm not sure if it got that type of response here.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me, the arguments about the health of the show, or the hiring of actors with name values, assume facts that are unknown and undocumented.  They infer a causal relationship between the correlation of events that might have had nothing to do with each other.  It would be equally unfair to say that Beverly McKenzie's leaving GL in 1992 was the cause for hiring Petronia Paley.  Two issues that co-occur does not indicate that one caused the other.

I can only comment on my experience as a viewer, and I was shocked when Quinn was killed off.  It caught my attention to watch the rest of the story.  And, yes, I was disappointed in the explanation of the killer's motives.  But, that didn't diminish the experience of the reveal of Quinn as a victim at the time when spoilers were unavailable to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Given that Paley was a recurring presence in those years and also began appearing before Beverlee left the show, I don't think anyone would say that Beverlee's exit led them to hire her.

I do think that there's a correlation with the health of the show and getting rid of longtime or compelling characters for the sake of flash in the pan hires. That's just me, and I don't really want to get into it in great detail, as the thread was already shut down once lately as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think the gross ickiness is Josh Griffith's intention. At birth, Ian Ward stole Mariah from Sharon, so that Sharon knew only of the Cassie twin and not the Mariah twin.  Sharon gave up Cassie for adoption at birth, never knowing that Mariah existed. When Ian Ward stole baby Mariah, he had her be raised by a woman member of his cult. She grew up in his cult. Years later, after Mariah was an adult in Genoa City and had left him, he tried to kidnap her to marry him himself, I sort of remember some icky scenes where he had arranged a wedding, but she escaped or was rescued -- it was so gross that I chose to forget it, and I don't want to look up the details. Mariah is feeling traumatized/triggered by Ian Ward being in Genoa City several months ago, because he was obsessed with her, and he terrorized her loved ones, interacted with Tessa, and drugged Sharon, which ultimately resulted in the death of Heather -- causing the grief of Daniel and Lucy. None of that was Mariah's fault. But she was so horrified by what happened, that she feels she did something wrong that caused this hateful villain to continue to obsess about her.   Based on small comments that Mariah made recently, I think she feels completely worthless. I gather that when she was away on the business trip a month or two ago, all of what happened with Ian Ward and Heather's death just hit her all at once and she was mentally/emotionally collapsing, and just felt unable to call for help.  During the business trip she sat in her hotel room and spiraled more, feeling more and more worthless and afraid. Finally she started drinking at a bar, and that's when the creepy old man approached her.  By that point, she wasn't in her right mind, and started interacting with the guy.  Either she thought he was Ian, or she thought he was someone like Ian, and she would be *required* to flirt with him in a role play, and do what he commanded, almost like old programming being reactivated.  Or perhaps just simple self-loathing playing out. I don't know if the guy actually knew Ian or Jordan, or if he was a random stranger.  But Mariah's fear/loathing/subconscious chaos kicked in. And then... well that's as far as her flashbacks have aired so far. She can't bear to face the rest of whatever it was.  I gather that in the coming episodes, we'll (eventually) find out what happened next as we see more of the icky flashbacks. --------------- The rest of this post is only my speculation: I think that she felt like she was supposed to have sex with him but didn't want to, and may have tried to kill him instead. Or he r*ped her.  Or they didn't have sex at all, but it's all convoluted in her mind.  Something horrible happened but I don't think it was her fault.  If the man died, maybe she covered it up?  I really don't know, I'm just speculating ideas. At any rate, I'm totally convinced that this is NOT a conventional "cheating storyline" where someone willingly has sex outside their relationship. ----------------- This is basically Josh Griffith's obsession with dark storylines, creepy villains, and terrible writing of "mental health issues".
    • The most we ever saw was on the "Roger years" tape.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy