Jump to content

April 20-24, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Demo Changes from last year:

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.7 (same)

2. DAYS 1.4 (-.1)

3. B&B 1.2 (same)

4. AMC 1.1 (same)

4. GH 1.1 (-.6)

6. OLTL 1.0 (-.4)

7. ATWT 0.9 (-.1)

8. GL 0.7 (-.3)

I had forgotten how low AMC was at this time last year in the demo. It was at 1.1, while OLTL was at 1.4, and GH at 1.7. (GH lost more than a third of its 18-49 audience).

Soapnet is up, substantially in primetime, so some of these losses are viewers migrating to SoapNet. SoapNet was the 5th fastest growing cable net in primetime (AMC/OLTL/GH) this past year, with a 35% increase in the 18-49 demo during that time. (Still, GH's losses are inexcusable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sh!t...look at those GH demo falls. Sara Bibel's column to Brian Frons today is EXCORIATING, but so beautifully honest and reflective of what the UNIVERSE is saying at this point.

The question is this: Does Frons/Disney feel (as Nightline seemed to suggest) that the genre is gone...therefore these numbers are not their fault...and it lets them "move on".

Or, do they accept responsibility and take this as a warning sign? Everything in my gut says, sadly, it is the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WOW! Thanks, Carolyn! This truly is the all-important number for soap's survival, and it says so much. Mainly that AMC is not in as much trouble as its fans believe. Whatever they think of the stories, or what Pratt has done, the fact that it's holding its 18-49 demo means there probably won't be many changes anytime soon.

GH and OLTL, though... it's truly scary what's happening there.

And a second "WOW!" You weren't kidding, Mark. I don't think Sara's ever put her emotions out there as strongly as she did with today's entry. Sad thing is, she'll probably be disregarded by TPTB as a bitter former writer with an axe to grind, when in reality, she seems to understand what needs to be done (even though she claims she doesn't, humble as she is), better than anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never gotten the impression that Frons or Disney really care that much. His job is to ensure ABCD is profitable and perhaps with their cost cutting, they are delivering acceptable profits. I'm still of the belief that the writing changes at AMC and OLTL had less to do with Frons realizing they needed to make a change versus the megastars on those shows being publicly vocal about the lackluster writing, almost embarrassing him into making a change.

But in today's world, profit is king. It's alll ABC cares about and I am sure the other networks are in general the same. But IMO it's not just ABCD that is suffering, their primetime lineup has been getting whipped by CBS for the last couple of years. Their desire to cater to the younger viewers, who don't and won't have time to invest substantially in anything IMO has been their achilles heal. While I think this works for cable stations who can have specialized viewing targets, a network station catering to this seems a little ludicrous. Of course maybe Fox has proved me wrong on that who knows. The advent of cable, on demand style viewing, the internet, internet viewing, and DVR's are all factors as well. I realize ABC has suffered the most in the past several weeks, but no soap even Y&R is really setting the world on fire ratingswise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark, I read Sara Bibel's blog comment to Frons. I didn't come away agreeing with most of her opinions. The only thing that I agreed with is that ABC needs to revise its focus group questions. ABC cannot cherry pick the answers that they want from these groups and expect to get people's real opinions.

I do not trust the executive producers or head writers at ABC. I especially hope that Frons will never give free reign to Guza and Phelps. If Guza had no checks and balances, the mob would be 100% of GH. We would see murder mysteries at the hospital and shoot outs in the hospital lobby like on Night Shift 1. The remaining Qs would be dead in a couple months. Anyway, I didn't think that GH was that great under Guza in the 1990s. IMO, GH began its steady decline then. Phelps killed off Maureen Bauer and Frankie Frame. She would likely do the same thing to Alexis.

Despite all my rambling about GH's writing, I am not convinced that GH's recent ratings demo dip is completely about content. GH has been crap for years. Why are the viewers suddenly tuning out? I don't have a clue. By the end of sweeps, the demos could easily bounce back. If I was Frons I would not do anything until the demos for May sweeps come in. I doubt that Frons does anything regardless.

The only thing that I would if I was Frons is hire a co-headwriter or strong consultant to help reshape GH's stories which might help kill the predictability factor. If the demos do not rebound by November sweeps, if I was Frons, I would start looking for replacement programming for all the ABC soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never like to see a soap drop, but I LOVE IT, absolutely LOVE IT when GH drops. I am happy to see them out of the top 5 and quite honestly I have no shame in saying that. They truly deserve it.

After everything Frons and Guza did to their veteran cast, they are getting what they deserve. The mob garbage killed GH! The bottom like is, characters like Sonny, Jason, Claudia, Spanelli, Ethan, every recurring player involved with the mob, Sam, Jax, they all need to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting points there regarding Guza and Phelps, Ann. I agree with you 100% about Guza, but Phelps on the other hand, I believe that if she was paired with a really good writer, GH would be a lot different. I don't think the majority of the Quartermaine family would be gone like it is today. I think the show would still be all about the hospital. As much of a hack as I always felt JFP was and is, I think she has learned from her past mistakes. The bottom line is, is that I don't see her producing a show that is a pile of sh!t when she has full control. GL under her was phenomenal, minus the death of Maureen Bauer. But like I already stated, she had an incredible writing team. With good writer's and JFP's production abilities, her GH could be great. We already know Guza is not a good writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't find myself agreeing with what Sarah Bibel said. Bob Guza was a decent writer when under management from a strong competent EP. I don't agree with leaving him to his own designs. He'd make GH 100 percent mob.

And as much as I dislike the show, they are trying to do some things right. It's been more balanced, there has been better family stuff, I don't think the PPD story is as bad as online has claimed(although I don't think Kimberly McCullough did the story justice IMO). But the problem is do what they may, this show has no heart left and balance can't change that at all. The heart left with no Laura Spencer, no Bobbie, no Quartermaines. And adding Martha Byrne, Billy Dee Williams won't change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy