Jump to content

Y&R/ Maria Bell losing their way?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

To put my two cents in.... not that this is even a little bit surprising.... the show is fine. Now most of the haters may perceive me as a dumb fan who doesn't know quality or something like that, but I really don't care. Everything that I am looking for in a soap is currently on Y&R and has been for months now.

Just because your own soap is lousy doesn't mean that now all soaps need to be just as bad. Y&R is not perfect, but good enough to keep me satisfied. I seriously couldn't handle constantly whining over any of the ABC soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, yes, we are back to the Sylph is so above all the hausfraus on this messageboard bullsh-t. So far everyone I know on here are men, mostly gay. Hausfraus? My mommy went back to work in 1984, oh and it did kill her to miss AMC at the height of Greg and Jenny. But life is full of sacrifices.

Can we just set up a seperate thread where Vee can "stay on top of" the posters that she/he despises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Precisely. Another stunt, light-the-fire move, to call these people haters. Perhaps I am wrong, but I never saw e.g. rangethatrover say "I hate Y&R!" What I saw was a pretty well-rounded opinion on what he doesn't like and why. In several threads. Between dislike and hate there is a huge difference.

About that bolded part... After these 5 or 6 pages or whatever... I have to say that I just don't know why opposite views can't co-exist. Someone likes it, someone does not. If you like it, stop convincing people it's great. If you don't like it, the same goes for you. But yes, do state your opinion. No one is going to hang you or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I wondered if that is part of what is going on.

I just identified a whole bunch of negative statements from you -- from many of the regulars in the Y&R thread who have identified themselves as bona fide Y&R fans. I didn't do everyone...just a sampling.

But, yes, there was a MIX of positive and negative. And, if I'm truthful, positive was probably in excess of negative...even during a sh!tty week dominated by a chipmunk :).

Like you, though, I wondered "why is this a problem?" You seem to suggest it is the social comparison, misery-loves-company thesis. "I have the critical skills to see my soap sucks; you don't see that your soap sucks; ergo, you must lack critical skills". But the problem is -- if you actually READ the Y&R thread -- it is not gushing. People highlight the good and the bad.

I've also wondered about being a fan of a show where one CAN'T find anything worthy of praise. If I compare that to a human relationship -- that's a sado-masochistic dance, not a relationship. If you can't identify and express the things you love, it makes the things you hate unbearable.

I could understand if the Y&R was an unrelenting string of positivity--an almost cultish glee--no admissions of error or imperfection (kind of like the last Bush administration). But that is not what the Y&R thread has...not on any objective reading, IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dmarex- No one thinks anyone who enjoys Y&R is a "simpleminded" fan. Most people, from soap press to fans are enjoying Y&R. It is probably the ony critically acclaimed soap currently airing.

MarkH- "Raving" was not the best word, and I am not into dissecting every word I use.

The fact is- and I am done here after this- Y&R fans cannot handle criticism of their show. If you don't agree with me, that is fine. I have nothing left to say about Y&R. And as god as my witness, I am not saying another word about Y&R at this board, past, present, future, good, bad. Done. Like I said before, it is like talking to a wall. No room for debate. It all comes down to personal attacks. I have to go find a cure for swine flu now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who called RTR a hater? That's what I'm struggling with. Who said that? And who said he wasn't allowed to be a hater, if he is?

Where is the controversy coming from? Has anyone said RTR's opinions are not welcomed? Can you link me to that post?

Again, I'm very confused. dmarex expressed an opinion, saying he likes his show. Full stop. Good. As my earlier quote showed, even dmarex has points of criticism with regard to even the last week's shows.

Why is dmarex's expression of the positive opinion a negation of the negative opinions of others, or interpreted as "stop conving people its' great".

Where did dmarex engage in such an act of persuasion? Can you please link me to that post?

The gist I'm getting from all of this is that there should be a "predominantly critical thread" and "predominantly positive thread", and the MERE EXPRESSION of opposite opinions constitutes some kind of negation or denial of opinion?

If that gist is right, I'm sputtering. Because that is not what a discussion board is about.

Again, concrete links to concrete sentences to back up these generalities would be deeply appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is a shame RTR won't read this, because my question won't get answered.

I'd like to find a SINGLE POST...just one...ANYWHERE...FROM ANY TIME...EVER, where "Y&R fans cannot handle criticism of their show".

I personally doubt such evidence exists. Which means we're dealing with some kind of perception problem.

But, let me flip it around and assume RTR is correct.

That would imply that Y&R fans are a fiercely loyal and positive group, and their affections for their show are clearly stated. Where is that a bad thing? I'm not seeing the problem.

That said, I do not believe RTR is correct. As my post above clearly shows, the most positive Y&R fans are frequently expressing negative sentiments. It's just that they're not WHOLISTICALLY negative...they are focused on strengths and weaknesses.

That -- the way I was taught -- is the essence of good criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, my. For the love of all that is good and holy, please find something to stabilize your moods and even you out so we don't have to deal with your whiplash mental state week after week. If it's not one grand pronouncement from on high at the summit, it's another. rangethatrover has decided Y&R is boring! rangethatrover can't watch OLTL! Don't get in his way! Why are you treading on him?!

RTR, your passion for listening to your own voice is inspired. But the fact is that if you look back at your unbelievably colorful and mildly worrisome posting history, you will find that no one has ever stopped you from saying anything you want to about anything that flits across the jagged archipelago of your mental plain. No one is stopping you. No one is censoring you. You have nothing to rebel against. So frankly, your endless posturing and yelling and proud flounces out of the room don't make much sense. What are you upset about? What are you angry about? What opinion or expressed viewpoint has been denied you? Who has kept your light behind a bushel or in a box? Everyday it's something new and crazy and defiant, with trembling jaw and shaking finger pointed forward like a 1950s melodrama. I can't help but listen to your latest gasbaggery, because you're always there!

You don't care for Y&R - okay. You've told us that at least thirty times in one month. Your moral outrage at censorship falls flat when you have never even censored yourself, let alone allowed someone to do it for you, and nobody has stoned you or assaulted you for your point of view on any show. Nobody has attacked you about Y&R in here; on the contrary, since the start of the thread, it's been Y&R fans attacked for "not listening" to your complaints or not engaging you in exactly this kind of strenuous argument. Apparently, agreeing to disagree is not enough for you. So what, exactly, has been denied you? Who is preventing you from speaking your mind, about anything? How are "the cool kids" keeping you down? Please, I want to know.

If you're going to play rebellious teen, I always say it's best to have a legitimate cause. You don't; you're apparently just angry that people don't pay enough attention to you, or that discussion goes on regardless of how you feel. But that's what happens on a message board. Live with it. God knows I do. I may be a lot of terrible words, but if I have a beef about something I tend to be able to articulate it. I think it's the least you could do.

Now you're getting it. Except there aren't any concrete links. You're arguing with someone who thinks you're a sap and just wants to bat people around.

P.S. - If this nonsense about PMs is directed at me, I want to say, by all means, produce these Private Messages and post them. I've never PMed Sylph in my life, or harassed anyone over PM, and the staff can prove that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I rarely ever PM anyone else. I PM once in a blue moon, maybe eight messages in three years, and there's never been anything remotely scandalous about it, so please, if this is supposed to be your latest half-ass attempt at 'enigmatic Mata Hari by way of a studio apartment,' and if you're insinuating something about me, then I'm afraid you're on the wrong track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy