Jump to content

Why is telenovela format problematic in US?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have seen several telenovelas, they ranged from brilliant to brilliant awful. Often criticised for actually being one and the same story all over again, usually about a young woman who lived the first twenty years of her life in absolute misery and poverty and who after five hundred episodes finds out that she is actually a rich heiress and that another person, usually a guy, took her place, because there was a baby switch at birth... Turns out, she's also in love with him, they kiss, then they fight, all the time everyone is against them, he cheats on her, they break up, then they kiss again, they marry. The end.

Apart from presenting a distorted vision of reality, being made in the panem et circenses strategy to please the masses, it also features a heavy mix of annoying elements: the incessant crying, because everyone in the show cries all the time, there's a lot of praying, Virgencita de Guadalupe is featured prominently throughout, the acting also ranges from brilliant to awwwwful, awwwwful in equal measure, but when it's brilliant — it's brilliant, especially when the scene sucks or when it's about faking the crying or something like that, incestuousness everywhere, lots of stolen babies, the treacherous other woman, intrigue, lies, those staples of melodrama... Then there are those saccharine stories about the goodness of the human heart and all, sexual tension everywhere yet it's all so tame (and lame)... You know the drill.

But in that vaaast sea of inimitable dreck, they are also tight, often well-structured, climaxes can be great, peripeteias fantastic, the cliffhangers amazing, the villainess is at times so great you can't take your eyes off of her, everyone is conected to everyone, sometimes in the most amazing ways, the dialogue can be good (very good in confrontational scenes)...

In the end — it's a soap. However, even when thoroughly cleansed of all the horrors, it still wouldn't work in the US. At least, I think so.

Why is that? Does anyone have a theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It can be enjoyable (as much as I remember from my past days) but it's almost always just the same. You always know what to expect in the end and it's weird when you already know what is going to happen to the main characters even though you never watched it.

The ending is always the same. If the good guy/good girl end up together it's nothing special, yet everyone is happy and they expected it. However, if the writers decide to write a different ending (with the good girl settling for a different guy) then everyone hates the soap.

It's just all done. We're mostly left with re-makes. That's as much as I know. Of course, many claim Brazil is totally different in their production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But I'm not talking about that. I was referring to a soap in the US manner but with an ending in sight. The ending does not by all means have to be a happy one, it most certainly will be, but with some sort of a twist on a clichéd formula. I said when you purge it of all the dreck, it still wouldn't work. And I wonder why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It did feature those (in)famous 13-week story arcs (Fate, Time in a Bottle, Tainted Love, Tempted, Miracles Happen, Secrets, Superstition, Torn, Naked Eyes, Surrender, Desire, The Gift), but it was also plagued by a whole armada of different other problems, vampires among them, so it's difficult to say what exactly undid that soap: the structure or the vampires and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beyond soap - BBC embraces villains, plot twists and Latin style of telenovela

Corporation invests millions in South American format that has proved a worldwide hit

Owen Gibson, media correspondent


For decades they have stopped hundreds of millions of Latin American viewers in their tracks with their melodramatic tales of lost love, convoluted dynastic disputes and overwrought plot twists. Trying to get served in a bar in Brazil or a cafe in Colombia while either country is in the grip of the latest hit telenovela is futile as all eyes fix on the omnipresent television set.

Now British broadcasters are looking to the telenovela as their secret weapon in the battle to boost ratings, with the BBC investing millions in its own prime-time version. The corporation is working with big-name writers on several ideas and has commissioned the playwright Jonathan Harvey to develop a telenovela project with Talkback Thames, the independent production company behind The Bill and The Apprentice.

Since first airing in Brazil, Cuba and Mexico more than 50 years ago, telenovelas have branched out beyond Spanish and Portuguese-speaking countries as far afield as China, Russia and Malaysia, and the first US incarnation of the genre is proving a hit this autumn. The dividing line can be thin, but whereas soap operas are typically open ended, designed to run until ratings or fashion dictate they must bow out, telenovelas have a predetermined story outline, running for an average of six to eight months.

"We're going to have a go at doing something in the telenovela mould," the BBC's head of fiction, Jane Tranter, confirmed. "We will know how many episodes we will do from the start. It will have a beginning, middle and an end, but we'll shoot each episode just a few days before."

In South America telenovelas are the main form of television drama and dominate the schedules with a wide range of themes and subject matter. In recent years some have become more gritty, bringing sociopolitical issues to a mass audience, while others remain pure romantic escapism, often set in the past or including musical numbers.

A classic example of the genre is the hugely popular Yo Soy Betty, La Fea (I am Betty, the Ugly), which originated in Colombia but has been sold to broadcasters in 70 countries around the world. Most recently the US version, Ugly Betty, has become the surprise hit of the autumn season for ABC, the American network that is also home to the series Lost and Desperate Housewives. The Hollywood actor Salma Hayek - who began her career in telenovelas in her native Mexico - is the executive producer of the US version, having acquired the rights to the series and overseen its adaptation. It tells the story of a frumpy secretary who clambers to the top of the fashion world through her wit, charm and intelligence.

In the US version she has to survive the slings and arrows of the bitchy New York fashion scene while working as the PA to the editor of fictional fashion bible Mode. A subplot concerns the fate of the previous editor Fey Sommers, killed in a suspicious hit-and-run accident.

Ugly Betty is already pulling in more than 16 million viewers for ABC and delivering its best drama debut since 1995. News Corp's new TV channel MyNetworkTV plans to have at least two telenovelas as a key plank of its schedule.

Many telenovelas, particularly those from Spanish-speaking countries, share similar plotlines. A popular tale is for a poor, beautiful girl to meet a rich and handsome man. He leaves his devious and manipulative upper-class girlfriend for her in an effort to spite his rich family, but gradually falls in love with the heroine. Aided by members of his own family, the scheming ex tries a series of tricks to split them up. Eventually, after hours of twists, turns and convoluted plot somersaults, sometimes spanning years, the bad guys meet a gruesome end and the happy couple get married and have a baby.

The first truly global example of the genre was 1979 Mexican series Los Ricos Tambien Lloran, or The Rich Cry Too, which was watched by an estimated 100 million viewers in Russia alone. Pravda reported that in the Caucasus warring Georgian and Abkhazian soldiers arranged a tacit truce at the hours the show aired so they could watch it.

Ms Tranter said she had been drawn to the genre after the success of Bleak House, the BBC's Bafta-winning Charles Dickens adaptation, which was pacily shot and scheduled in the style of a soap in twice-weekly half-hour episodes.

BBC1 would make another Dickens adaptation, she said, but first wanted to have a go at "something a bit cheekier".

If the BBC can come up with a hit it would add an important element to its drama slate. While it has enjoyed a string of hits including Life on Mars, Doctor Who, Jane Eyre, Spooks, and Hustle, the BBC believes a long-running drama serial would be a valuable weapon in the ratings war and help draw an audience on nights when EastEnders and its hospital dramas are off air. Ms Tranter said the BBC might simply take an existing telenovela and reshoot it for a British audience, as ABC did with Ugly Betty, or get writers who understand the genre to come up with new ideas. "We'll flirt around with it and have some fun with it," she said.

The corporation's first stab at the genre would result in between 12 and 20 hours of television, which might run as half-hour or 60-minute episodes. "They all share a certain quality," Ms Tranter said. "They've all got that brio and spirit. They don't take themselves too seriously and yet emotionally they're quite tough. When it's joy, it's real joy and when it's pain, it's real pain."

But she promised that any BBC telenovela would stay true to the spirit of the genre and not tip into irony or kitsch. "They aren't the stuff of UK television culture so you have to understand what it is before you start breaking the rules. If we take some of the things that are very strong in it and have permission to have a bit of fun, we'll probably get something really good out of it."


Plotlines

From Cuna de Lobos, a hugely popular 1986 Mexican telenovela


Carlos, head of an international pharmaceuticals giant, tells his wife, Catalina, he knows her secret and plans to expose her. She has long claimed she was blinded in one eye by his eldest son from a previous marriage in an effort destroy the boy's confidence and allow his younger brother Alejandro, her son with Carlos, to thrive. She poisons and kills Carlos.

However, in his will Carlos has decreed that whichever of his sons produces a son first will control the company. Alejandro's wife, Vilma, is infertile so he secretly "marries" a second woman, Leonora, and has a son, Edgar. Alejandro and Catalina take the child and dump Leonora in an asylum. Alejandro returns to Vilma and they pass the child off as their own.

Leonora escapes from the asylum, marries elder brother Juan Carlos and undertakes a series of byzantine schemes to unmask Alejandro, recover her child and punish Catalina.

The evil mother retaliates, protecting her scheme through a series of murders. Eventually, after many twists and turns, the story arrives at a happy and just conclusion.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/oct/18/broadcasting.bbc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the reason it hasn't worked in the US is because the quality is usually really poor. The failed MyNetworkTV soaps were just abysmal and had horrendous production values all around, including the two biggies, acting and writing. I think the US audience is a lot different than the South American audience in that there's more of a self-aware, post-modern attitude that doesn't lend itself to hokey over-the-top romance plots. I think the genre could work if brand new limited run soaps were developed in the US and not adapted from already existing ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think telenovelas have really had a chance to succeed here, honestly. If you don't even consider the quality of the MNTV shows (some people thought they were great fun, some people thought they were hideous), they had epic fail written all over them. Let's experiment with something completely new to US primetime and put it on the least-watched network. Watch the audience pile in for that! Everyone's going to talk about how awesome Fashion House and Desire are! They'e gonna be the hot new guilty pleasures!

No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is, US Viewers are used to a particular idea of a soap and telenovelas are obviously different. Knowing that a show will wrap up in a few months or so sort of takes some of the suspense out of it, when a show has an open ended run, there is a lot more suspense and curiosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always loved watching telenovelas. When I was like 10-12 I used to watch only Mexican telenovelas. They were so trashy and campy that I loved to watch it. I always rooted for villains because they were great....cartoonish, but great.

Now in my 20's I watch Brazilian novelas. They are great because they have excellent actors and actresses, the plots are interesting, the scenography and costumes wonderful.... and the scenery :wub:

Now I can't stand Mexican telenovelas. They are all the same. And that is sad. Something that worked in 80's or 90's doesn't work in the 21'st century IMO. Most of them have the same plot. Poor girl, rich guy in love. His family doesn't approve the relationship because the girl is poor. Than, the main female villiain decides to break them apart. After 50-60 episodes, the family realizes there was a baby mix up 20 years ago. The poor girl is their daughter, the rich guy is not their son. Now, he's poor and she's rich...That's the biggest shock level Mexican telenovelas get....It's just silly and dumb...

Brazilian novelas have interesting plots. In "Belissima" the world of fashion was represented and the Greek culture too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65rfOk3krGs

In "Paginas da Vida" (Pages of Life) the main plot was about a young woman Fernanda who got pregnant and rejected by her boyfriend Leo. She returns to Brazil from Amsterdam and her mother is devastated by the news....one year goes by and Fernanda is killed in a tragic car accident, but before her death she gives birth to twins.. a girl and boy...Grandmother rejects the girl when the doctors tell her she has Down's syndrom, but she keeps the boy. The story was just wonderfully played and written. Here is promo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDUREI24-uQ

In "Caminho das Indias" (Indian Ways), the three main plots are the Indian culture, schizophrenia and psychopathy. So, when you watch the show, you even learn something from it.

Why the format is not working in USA? I really don't know. Maybe if some larger network decides to put some telenovela on air, we could see if it becomes a hit or a flop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why is telenovela format problematic in US?

Because the US is a youth-oriented culture that fears death! :lol: Death is viewed as a terrible trauma and the ending of anything is something to be mourned.

Telenovelas, with their mapped-out beginning and endings, would be too traumatic! At least with beloved TV shows, we know they will most likely return in the fall (or they live on in box sets). Even then, people pine over the summer in need of their Lost-fix or whatever it is.

People want to invest in shows and their characters. The question right now may not be "Why are soaps dying?" but "How have they lasted so long?" Maybe because people turn again and again to something they believe could last forever. Telenovelas kill that illusion. Why bother investing in something which will be gone in three months?

On another note, I co-sign what CassieFan said about Brazilian telenovelas. They are beautifully staged, sensually produced and glossily filmed -- and they don't shy away from sexuality or other issues that our Big 4 TV networks seem to have a problem with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regarding that whole death thing...

What if I said This show will die eventually, I don't know when, but it will. I mean it will last somewhere between 3 and 5 years, for example, but I don't know whether it will be exactly 3 or 4 or 5? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting question. And I think the points made above about advertisers are certainly valid. I don't think anybody has truly tired a telenovela format. PC was a soap kind of trying the format but in the end it was still basically an regular ongoing soap. MyNetwork TV was just nasty and cheap. I think it could work. Maybe if the ending wasn't the ENDING but the arc was structured as more of a "season" with the possiblity of continuing the story or spinning it off. People are certainly used to that. Isn't that what Night Shift was?

I know Heroes has employed that with it's "volumes." Whether or not its been a good idea is up to each person to decide for themselves. I will say that one of the benefits of the volume structure was that when Heroes really started to suck you knew that volume would end and maybe the next one could redeem the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy