Jump to content

CBS cancels Guiding Light


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This was not Ellen's fault.

In fact, the GL experiment ("new production model") NEEDED to be done.

Soaps started as dimly lit things where most of the sets were black velvet curtains. That was when they were most cost effective.

GL tried to take that "cost effective" thing (which Brad Bell has also said is essential for viability), and update it. Moreover, they used a production style that has worked well for other shows (e.g., The Office, Friday Night Lights). Concretely, it bought GL another year. Mileage will vary regarding whether that was a "good" or "bad" thing.

Other parts of the GL experiment (like the cast cuts and low-veteran-use) are being widely practiced on ABC and Days and P&G shows. So that is nothing special.

Finally, GL is roundly accused of having bad writing for a long time. Yup. Find me one -- one -- soap that hasn't gone through a fairly recent spate of that? Those shows aren't being canceled...yet.

The reality is that factors unrelated to any of this...related to CBS, affiliates, changing demographics, desirable demographics, a shrinking economy, new media...THOSE are the factors to blame.

I truly believe that GL's age was part of its' liability. A 72-year old show (including radio) is "Grandma's stories". Say that to someone on Madison Avenue, and they're gonna cancel you as quick as they can. Given how old it was, in an industry that values youth, it is shocking -- shocking -- that GL was saved as long as it was.

When people say "7 more to go", they're right. The game is rigged so that these shows MUST fall. And no -- none -- kein -- human being can save or kill them. It cannot and will not be done. Ellen Wheeler probably deserves blame...but not one iota more blame than you or me. We're all part of the system that got us to this point.

Every day older our soaps get, and every day older the audience mean age gets, is another day closer to extinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Daytime is too littered with failed Primetime pilot writers/execs.

They need to turn the shows over to people who actually like soaps. Not people who want to turn them into something else.

Wheeler... Goutman... JFP... Guza... I'm looking at you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guess you arent feeling the Jeff Branson love..... not that it would happen anyway..... both of my items....

Umm..... so is there going to be a bidding war on some of these unemployed actors? I think Gina will definitely get some calls....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, little old me? I didn't make the actors change clothes in the back of a family sedan, Mark.

Calling the game rigged and impossible is promoting the kind of apathy the production staff expects from itself and from its audience. As long as everyone stays lethargic, they'll be able to move on to the mythical fantasy land of primetime or film work that much sooner. Daytime has always had a hardscrabble road. But the format, the serial doesn't die unless people want it to, unless they don't want to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There were ways to retool the production model that did not simultaneously alienate and demean both the audience and the cast and crew. Ellen Wheeler was also the wrong person to do the job. But more importantly, GL would not have gotten to a place to have to retool without years of bad management by a variety of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hear you...I believe a part of what you say...but in the end, I do not agree. Which is irrelevant, because I could be wrong :).

When I step way back, I see no form surviving this long. Games shows...pretty much dead. Certainly the daily daytime ones. Westerns...pretty much dead. Hell...network nightly newscasts at 6:30 pm...dying fast.

What I believe is that what you write could have influenced GL's RELATIVE POSITION. That is, GL COULD be the number one soap now, and the last to go. That DOES lay at the feet of the showrunners and the network and the affiliates, etc. So, GL could absolutely have been positioned as the last to go!

But go, it would...and sooner than later.

Maybe, though, I'm just a whack job apologist who fails to assign proper responsibility. Seriously...I'm not being ironic...I don't know....but I deeply believe GL's cancellation is ultimately about the state of the genre (daily daytime melodramas), and not about GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there was a board meeting or something and one of the members asked: Bloom, what's this cr*p you're supervising that has a 1.0 rating? Cancel it.

Or something like that. I think they only noticed this show existed right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
    • That was one of the best grandslam finals.  Alcaraz comes all the way back down 2 sets to 0, and three match points in the 3rd set, to win it in a 5th set tie-break.  And the quality of play was excellent - so many great shots.  What a battle!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy