Jump to content

CBS cancels Guiding Light


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The problem was the demos. The HH ratings might have been inching up somewhat, but the demos were flat at best. They just weren't getting the 18-49s and 18-34s. They had something like a .9 in one of those key demos last week, which is horrendous. That's why they advertised the hell out of Otalia, hoping that they'd appeal to a younger crowd. They definitely generated some buzz and were probably responsible for the slight bump in HHs, but obviously that bump wasn't among the viewers CBS was trying to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes. I'm hopeful GL will have a good ending, which I couldn't have said last year, or a few years ago. I was only saying that, while I understand Newcomb's point, I don't think this is the same type of peace fans of Paul Harvey or readers of Peanuts may have felt. I know I sound like I'm nitpicking, I just think fans are justified if they spend some time being ticked off about CBS' decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have NEVER seen anyone in the media address just WHY these young demos are SO coveted. To me, it just depends completey on who your sponsors are. Do the networks want shows that ONLY appeal to people under 40? And NOTHING else? I see commercials all over the networks for erectile dysfunction drugs, poli-grip, statin drugs, etc... is CBS gonna tell Eli-Lilly and Pfizer to go f&#k themselves, "WE don't want your products on our network"? I would just think that demos would be MEANINGLESS.... you bascially tailor the commercials to the SHOW, if it's a cartoon or children's show, you sell Toys and breakfast cereal. If it appeals to young women, you sell Birth control, diapers, and tampons. If it's seniors, you sell depends, poli-grip, and statin drugs. What's the damn difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hey GL Fans....someone should send nasty hate posts to the writer of BuzzerBlog and his followers:

http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/pyram...on-cbs-daytime/

CBS’s long-running soap opera Guiding Light is indeed canceled. But who really gives a crap. The main exciting part is CBS will be keeping the hour that the previous program, filled with the finest in bad acting and probably a plot line about a witch or some midget, occupied and putting something new there. What will be taking its place? TV Week is reporting CBS is looking at a revival of Pyramid, the also long-running game show hosted by Dick Clark to fill its gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS on the whole has always skewed older. I think the demos are also why The Price is Right has added alot of luxury designer goods, ie. Coach bags, Burberry coats, Louis Vuitton luggage, Manolo Blahnik and Jimmy Choo shoes, as prizes. They want to attract the 18-49 female audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is this a sarcastic statement?

The genre has evolved multiple times before. It moved from radio to TV. Shows changed from 15 minutes to half an hour to an hour. It shifted from domestic life in its early days, to Young Love, to action/adventure in the 1980s -- along the way encompassing themed shows like "Dark Shadows" and "The Edge of Night" too.

GL started as a religious sermon!

Being on all year gives soaps the quickest opportunity to adapt to changes in real life events, and to explore relevant social issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One criticism I think that is fair is the rigid adherence to the same themes over and over again, year after year, that all the soaps are guilty of. You mention EON and DS, and yet today there is no soap going its own way and when one tries to it gets smacked down by the fans. (Passions, Port Charles). GH I guess is on its own with the mob, but after 15 years that's about 14 years too much because daytime can never do that genre justice. Soaps have not evolved in the face of rising disinterest and indifference and still cling to all the things that were the hallmarks of GL. And GL got canceled and yet all the soaps still try to be GL. People cite the Reva clone story as being the absolute nadir for GL, and yet had that aired on OLTL or DOOL nobody would have given it a second thought. Meanwhile, somebody in the 1990s told all the soap writers they need to write every soap as if it was GL. Now they almost all look and sound alike, starring a merry go round of actors who hop from show to show, written by a small group of writers who just swap jobs.

I don't see the shows evolving or learning from this, or trying to figure out what would be of interest to audiences in 2009 and beyond. They will just continue to tell tales about babies and triangles and throw their hands up in the air saying "why isn't anyone watching this???"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL was constantly experimenting to see what clicked, and evolving, recently too -- with the "Inside the Light" episodes a couple years ago, podcasts, the location work and permanent sets of the new production model, and Otalia.

I have no idea what you mean by writing every soap to be like GL? I don't remember GL being about what you seem to think it was about. It's not a show about "babies and triangles" and I don't think it ever really was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup.

The writing is not to blame. Even when soaps were at the peak they tended to be pretty silly. Luke and Laura vs a weather machine on GH, Roman Brady on DOOL coming back as a priest only it turned out he wasn't really Roman, entire towns sleeping together and nobody thinks it is strange but then on christmas they all sit down and sing carols...you can cite so many ridiculous things about soaps, but a lot of that is what makes them fun. If soaps weren't silly there would have never been parodies like Carol Burnett doing "As The Stomach Turns" 35 years ago.

In primetime when a show is faltering on Wednesday you try Thursday. Or maybe you try a new time. GL and all the other shows have been failing for years and the networks refuse to move them elsewhere. There was a strike on last year, why didn't CBS air GL at night instead of America's Most Dangerous Nanny Swap? Nothing the writers of GL could ever put on paper would have saved the show. It isn't saving any of them really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wasn't being literal there. I think if you go back to the glory days of high ratings, GH was the adventure soap, OLTL was the wacky soap, GL was the more serious relationship drama soap, B&B was the glamour soap, DOOL was the supercouple soap and they all had a slightly different bent. Most of them started to bleed together in the 1990s doing material that with a change of a name and a slight tweak might work on any of the soap (not JER DOOL or Passions). Maybe I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember when CBS owned stations first dropped GL from 3.00pm till 10.00 am.the replacement was' Day&Date'.That show was soon cancelled.

Obviously,the numbers and demos were no better than GL.

Look for history to repeat itself.

The odds of GL's replacement improving on it's ratings are slim to none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy