Jump to content

Bring Morgan Fairchild on contract (plus Joan Collins on recurring) to B&B!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think the show could be good on long term if Lesli Kay would take over Stephanie's place as the matriarch once La Flannery leaves. She is a very fierce actress and soooo underused, it is a shame. As for Fairchild, I don't know her a lot but I wouldn't mind seeing her or Collins on guest-star but no more. A former primetime name has never really helped in B&B (remember Patrick Duffy, Linda Gray, Lorenzo Lamas, etc). By the way, I tend to think that their characters would be sort of what Lesley-Ann Down is (or should be) playing, a bitch on heels. I say let's focus on LAD, she can be great as a conterpart for Stephanie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I really like Heather Locklear, I think she can make magic on television. Unfortunately, I think the odds that she'd do daytime are slim to none. Heather's RICH, to the point that she only has to work on what she likes. I hear she has hit an impasse with the producer of Melrose Place II...she didn't like it, thus she likely isn't doing it.

Must say I take offense to saying that Joan Collins is "too old to function"...that's a terrible attitude. I don't think that's what you meant Bellcurve...but I just had to comment that Joan Collins is vital and energetic and a hard worker. She can do whatever she likes. The only reason I suggest she go for a recurring role is that Joan travels a lot, she lives in LA, London, NYC and St. Tropez, traveling is important to Joan, a contract role would be too much of a commitment, recurring would be great for her and I know she'd be wonderful.

I don't necessarily think Morgan would have to spar with a woman. I really like to think of her as menace, making everyone's lives hell! I think Susan Flannery has still got it, but she is now working less at her choice. Lesli Kay would be terrific.

Brad is at a point where he knows that he can't write the show as he has been for that much longer...change is going to come. I think he could take Morgan and Joan seriously, he did it with Jack Wagner (albatross that he may be). But Sylph I am in total agreement with you, Morgan and Joan won't make B&B perfect, the world will not be at peace, but they'd be refreshing additions. Total agreement there :)

I agree with you in part. Lesli Kay IS fabulous. She IS fierce and she IS criminally underused. However, she hasn't been kept around all these years for no reason, Brad loves Lesli...he simply needs help to integrate some of the cast better, he's used to his Core 4...when one of them goes, it'll be a dramatic shift for him.

I addressed Duffy (nice guy who plays nice guys and does a good job), Gray (great secondary character who was attached to the AWFUL character of Samantha) and Lamas (TERRIBLE actor) earlier.

I disagree with you about Morgan and Joan's potential characters becoming like LAD's Jackie. Jackie is the way she is because it's LAD playing her. LAD doesn't play a 'straight up glam bitch' well. She plays her characters neurotically, which I also like, but it's not how Morgan and Joan play their characters. Their characters can be tough and bitchy, but also funny and warm...but never neurotic (even when Morgan played Jordan Roberts on Falcon Crest, a character with multiple personalities, or Jennifer Pace on Search for Tomorrow, who heard voices, she wasn't neurotic).

As much as I like LAD, I'd ditch her in a second for Morgan, Joan or the fabulous Lauren Koslow. I think the problem with Jackie Marone is that, like Linda Gray's Priscilla Kelly, she's attached to a HORRIBLE character, this time in the form of Nick Marone. Being related to a terrible character taints the character. B&B needs to start fresh with its glam/tough women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ditto and ditto... loved her GL run... love the legacy of her infamous Dynasty role. At first I thought, "Yes I love Joan Collins, but that broad is like 76 years old now!" But then I thought about how B&B loves to showcase their older dames in strong, fierce roles so why not! Bring on Joan! Morgan Fairchild would be fun too.

In this day and age with former 80's/90's stars getting daytime work, you never know who'll pop back onscreen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think LAD was horribly miscast as JW's onscreen mother. They'd have made a HOT couple, even though Nick wouldn't have been worthy of her. I think the writers don't know what to do with 'Jackie' becuase they've made her the hot mother of a middle aged men. There are no available men in her age group, certainly none older, and the younger are either related to her son, or the relatives of those related to her son. Much younger than that and I think they're making a joke of Jackie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

May I ask why?

Couldn't you just read Vogue Paris or something?

This is the kind of woman I want to see on B&B:

11466-23782.gif

Which I realize comes from left field...but I just want these good actors to have substance and depth and conversations and consistency and emotional resonance. I'd give up the runway forever if the show were just more frequently touching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh yeah. Well, I'll have to construct that, because unlike a lot of other things, it is not a totally reasoned, incident-based thing. I did not like Paper Dolls, nor her in it. I did not like The City. I do not like her voice. I find her attractive enough but not beautiful. She never once inspired in me any great emotion, unlike all the other 80s soap femmes.

But these are generalities, so I'll have to give more specific exemplars. Suffice it to say I loved Joan Collins, Jane Wyman, Linda Gray (on Dallas), every single woman who ever graced Knot's Landing, most of the women on Melrose Place....I never liked Linda Evans or Victoria Principal or Morgan Fairchild. Morgan Brittany, on the other hand...

I'd say it was some kind of anti-blonde bias, but I just adored Joan Van Ark, Donna Mills (I love her!), Courtney Thorne-Smith (yup!), Heather Locklear (!).

But not Morgan Fairchild. I didn't even enjoy her, specifically, on Flamingo Road...even when I loved just about everyone on that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read French Vogue, I read Vogue Hommes too, Cat and I are friends with Carine Roitfeld. And also Plum Sykes and Kate Betts. :lol::P

The point was not model and runway: doesn't this picture tell you a powerful, tough-as-nails female executive who also has a softer, emotional side? It radiates that way to me. And the woman doesn't have to be a fashion house chief; I'd rather have her be a bank chief or something. Forresters primary lender or something.

So yes, lots of emotion. A woman who had a difficult emotional life, with lots of scars.

Vulnerability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
    • For a homeless woman, June sure has nice teeth. I agree Ted didn't bring the power in the fallout scenes but to can him and leave Tomas, Martin and Derek onscreen? i'm not looking forward to Martin's secret being revealed and have him flail in the spotlight scenes. Yes, he's got a little better, but... When someone like Timon delivers with every line reading, you wonder how some other casting decisions were made. And I need sunglasses every time characters are at Uptown-is that green paint left over from GL's Cedars Hospital makeover? And for the cliffhanger, instead of the Door dash nonsense, simply have Leslie encounter Vanessa on her way out and push past her to enter. As there is no front door have Leslie barge into the living room, with Vanessa following.  Then Nicole can tell Vanessa- it's OK she can leave them alone.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy