Jump to content

March 9-13, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There was a time when they did and special events in a couple's romance could really garner big ratings for a show. For instance Luke & Laura's Wedding or Steve & Kayla's Wedding which were 2 of the biggest rated hours of daytime. I don't think anything has topped either of them.

But things like that just don't happen anymore. I think that is where fan bases get the idea still that they have power and can threaten things but if the lack of impact on the ratings of Days that Drake and Dee's departure has made doesn't put an end to it nothing will.

For weeks and months we got the threats that Days was over when they were gone and that ratings would tumble after they were gone. Nothing has happened - in fact Days except for this week has gone up each week.

I agree with you that the days when couples or faves had that type of impact just are not there anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't think AMC has competition from GL at the moment. 1.9 is a low for AMC (although not an all time low, I assume), and 1.7 is GL's best number this year. AMC can always bounce back up, and probably will. I have my theories as to what is driving AMC viewers away (Rendall is a bad idea, Zach and Kendall as a couple are ruined, Zach is unwatchable, Zach/Reese continue to be a bizarre and unappealing relationship, stories like JR/Amanda/David/Jake/Krystal have managed to make all parties too unsympathetic to care about), but they will probably go back up next week. There's no way of knowing what's going to work on any given day, or what outside factors will be. Obviously some parts of AMC still work because the ratings have good periods and then fluctuate. The increased airtime for old favorites like Opal is a sign AMC can still play to some of their strengths.

I'd love to eventually see GL get to a 1.8 but I'm mostly just happy they didn't drop. Last week was very good and this week was good. I know they may move back towards some annoying stories soon, so I hope viewers who have given the show another chance will stay. I think many of the day to day episodes have been decent, not just some parts of them, and I hope that will continue, because that's a good way to get people to keep watching.

SteveFrame, there were some other people, like the late Kahlil Lowry, who saw some of what you saw in Jessica Leccia. I think a lot of viewers couldn't get past the triangle with Gus and Harley or how annoying Rafe was. Now that she's more on her own and is in the story with Olivia that uses her as more than a plot device, people have given her more of a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yay, GL! The "Phillip effect" has not just been a brief bounce, it has been sustained for a month and a half, so I am happy. I think it is funny though that GL must have gained viewers last week among boys and women over 49 since they dropped in all the demos listed.

I have never disliked Natalia (and Rafe too, I don't think he is annoying).

About viewership being lower as the week goes on, I think part of this is because people tape their shows and don't watch them till the weekend if they fall behind during the week. That's what I do. Those weekend viewings don't count in these ratings, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Speaking for myself, I gave up on Y&R weeks ago. At least for now - I usually come back around to watching it again eventually. However, I continue to thoroughly enjoy Guiding Light.

I think it had to do with the writing and the fact that she was in the Gush storyline. I never cared for Gush, but I know they had a huge fanbase and most couldn't stand Natalia for coming between them. I always thought she had potential to be a breakout actress and like some others, saw the sparks between her and Olivia even when Natalia was with Gus. Now that she is one half of the most well-crafted and beautifully told storyline in daytime, she has shown what she can do. Crystal gets a lot of the credit (as she should), but Jessica is holding her own. It's a shame GL's ratings aren't reflecting the quality story-telling. IMHO, it's the "best show you're not watching".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i'm with yah 100% phoenix....it's the best soap i've seen in years. i even LOVE the production...to watch other soaps now....ugh...it's just soooo fake that I find it distracting....Y&R had a commercial with someone in a car in the studio...i laughed when i saw it...i think guiding light is really onto something here...it's terrific...and I hope more people check it out....but be warned...when you check it out...it is very hard to go back to the fake outdoor scenes etc. with the old fashioned soaps - or soaps that use just 2-3 sets for days....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do like the new production values for the outside footage more often than not. I don't think they're on the same level as Y&R, which has a bigger budget and also has Paul Rauch, who is the king of good production values. I can see where people would rather look at Y&R than GL. It's more the ABC soaps where the studio stuff is starting to bother me.

I'd really like to see GL eventually be able to improve their production values just slightly and keep using the location work, because I think it's the interior sets that may put viewers off. I think more and more of the outside footage is of a decent quality, and helps add to the appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't go knocking fanbases thinking that they don't matter because the fact is the fanbases we are looking at are mostly online and I wouldn't even begin to think how low a percentage of the total soap viewing population that is but it could be growing. Now if the online fanbase is generally unhappy with a story, it will cause TPTB to constantly wonder and be aware if that unhappiness will manifest itself in the rest of the non-online audience as well. Kind of like snapshot polls in politics LOL!!

I think TPTBs and longtime fans of soaps are conceited and arrogant enough to continue to believe that soaps do matter. And you know what they really don't. It is only a matter of time before the genre sinks itself because it is not creative and innovative enough and longtime fans won't let the shows be creative and innovative enough. We all don't want the writing to step "outside the box" because we have been used to soaps being a certain for way for too long and we don't like change. We say we want it but when it does happen we are not comfortable and want it to go back to what it was.

I am a longtime fan of soaps and I never been so bored with the genre. I read more about the shows now than I actually watch or I will be in the middle of watching and I would just switch the channel out of frustration of seeing the same stories over and over and over. And then I don't want to see what's on for the next day. I love nostalgia as much as anyone can but more times than not going backwards just hold you back. I want to see something different more times than I don't want to see something different.

And nary a single one of the writers on ANY soaps can do what we all wish for...and that's QUALITY STORYTELLING. Because if we did have QUALITY STORYTELLING, there is no way that new fans would not be flocking to the shows to give them a boost. Or there is no way, the shows would be losing their longtime fans either. The shows can't keep relying on all us longtime viewers to sustain them like our ever dwindling 401(k) plans and Social Security! :lol: (I am not that old yet, just saying). And seeing as the shows are using other mediums to try and entice viewers to try out a soap, you would actually think the genre would be becoming more popular but no, it is going in the other direction. No one evens wants to do the Daytime Emmys anymore and viewers don't care to watch it either. And we can justify it by using all the excuses in the book like no one stays at home anymore, or the easily used excuse these days, the weather, or some other excuse when the ratings don't go up because we have "QUALITY STORYTELLING".

Somewhere in the bowels of the networks, there are "think tanks" trying to figure out how the heck we get around this money-losing aspect of our business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, GL because it's the only soap using this production model stands out, and not particularly in a good way, IMO. Soaps have been shot in studios for years, so it's only natural. And while the production model has improved somewhat from where it was a year ago, it's still not very polished IMO. The camera angles, closeups, filtering, and lighting are all grotesque IMHO. I think part of GL's ratings erosion last year had to with this production model, not the storytelling per se, because the show looked different, it felt different to many longtime fans. Also, you can tell the show is produced on a very tight budget when compared to other soaps, it just doesn't look very grand or polished, but some might like that rough look GL carries. If they had more money and better technical producers, this production model could've been so much better

I really hope no other soap suffers so much budget and ratings-wise to have to stoop so low and adopt GL's production model. It's just not particularly flattering and too much of a drastic change. Let's not forget GL had to adopt this production model because it had very little money, not because it was artistically the best thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you!

I don't think the positioning really matters that much. I do think losing total viewers from one week to the next would be alarming. I certainly do not claim to know how tptb interpret these results, but as for Days? I would think being up 54,000 viewers from last year would be a hollow victory vs. losing over 200,000 from last week. I have no idea what this time last year was like for that soap (or last week for that matter), but if I were in charge, I'd be concerned. Perhaps the previous week was the anomoly -- unusually high due to outside circumstances not directly related to what was airing?

As spotty as I think OLTL is right now (some days are effin' brilliant and then the next is mind-numblingly boring or stupid) I am pleased that they seem to be holding their ratings and their HH numbers week-to-week. That's what I've wanted to see for my favorite soap (besides good programming each and every day that is). Reduced volatility and slow and steady positive progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For years soaps were able to do location shooting as well as studio work. Events which needed more of a bang had location work. Or even if the soaps stayed in the studio, they managed to have some decent simulations of the outside (I think OLTL and Y&R still do this well). Now when I watch AMC and Greenlee goes over the cliff, I'm more inclined to laugh than to be caught up in the drama, because it just looks so ridiculous. Or when I hear GH going on about their great special effects for stunts like the Black and White ball, and then what you get onscreen is unintentionally hilarious CGI. Not that GL was that much better with their Grady dummy freefalling, but I thought the location work did add to the intensity of what was going on.

I don't think anyone is saying GL happily abandoned what they used to be. Some of us are just saying that there are some benefits to the new production model.

I watched GL when they were all about production values, during the Conboy era, and I thought the show itself became repulsive, regardless of the packaging. Now, with cheaper budgets and lower production values, I'm enjoying the show more than I have since somewhere around 2002. I don't mean this improvement in quality is because of the production, obviously it isn't, I just mean that for me at least, I'm really not bothered by the changes in the way they film. I'd like to see them have the money to go back to some of what they were, but I think sometimes people just focus on the production flaws and not on anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL about six months ago was dead in the water. Now since it has been a year since the new production model took over they got Grant back but there biggest buzz of all is OTALIA. In fact Otalia is overshadowing Grant in every way. The buzz, groundswell, and all the fans writing in about Otalia is enormous. Jessica Leccia went from being one of the most unpopular actresses on GL to now one of the most popular. Crystal/Jessica are getting some of the most mail of all the CBS soaps. CBS and Telenext are shocked as they put all their energy in Grant but Otalia is the major buzz. The ratings have stablizied and gone up and the viewership up. Three months ago GL was hitting all time lows but I am telling you right now GL is close to getting a one year renewel. If GL is renewed for another year, it all due to Otalia. This is their money couple. Natalia will marry Frank but they need to make the big Otalia moment huge for GL. Compare ATWT when Nuke never gets promoted but Nuke is nowhere near as popular as Otalia. Honestly GL is delivering a profit right now. The show is about 50 to 60% less expensive then GH which is delivering not much better numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Occasional location shoots differ a great deal from what GL is doing, IMO. When soaps do location shoots here and there, they have much more time to focus on what they're doing, assembling good coordination, and they don't tend to shoot with the types of cameras GL is using. I mean, compare the picture quality (not the writing and acting) between GL's current look and the occasional location work B&B and ATWT do, there's a huge difference in picture quality and overall aesthetics.

Unfortunately, that's a recurring theme with Conboy - all looks and no substance.

If soaps had to adopt a model like this, I'd hope that they can find some middle ground, or some type of hybrid. For example, I LOVED the way The City was filmed and incorporated lush studio sets with location footage though a filmic filter. I've heard it cost some money, but I think The City never had that much of big budget to begin with, and they pulled it off effortlessly. The writing and acting are another topic altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are there hard numbers on Nuke being "nowhere near as popular as Otalia"? Both seem popular to me, for good reason, and both also have detractors. Also, Nuke do get promoted, and I thought that was some fans' complaint actually, that for a time there was too much Nuke "hype."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
    • Not having watched AMC was one of the reasons I hesitated to make the comparison, tbf. It's odd--I feel like I could argue Cassie, Olivia, Harley and Dinah suffocated the show along with Reva the last five years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy