Jump to content

Handling the Frontburner


Recommended Posts

  • Members

See I disagree with that part in bold.

To me the better performer - and don't get me wrong I love Lucci - but to me the better performer is the one who can make any role work. And not just the better actor can do that.

As I said Susan Lucci makes Erica work but I have never seen any other role that she makes work. Not every actor can make every role work but a good performer can shine in any role - even a bad one or a badly written one.

If they truly have "IT" it shines no matter what role they are in. Lucci just does not do that every time. She is wonderful as Erica and wonderful on stage presenting and things, but I have seen her try in so many other roles in primetime and she just never did it. She never connected and she never rose above the material at all.

I have seen Susan Flannery play so many different types of roles, and she was wonderful in all of them. Same with Elizabeth Hubbard. James Mitchell has had several different roles even dancing in the movie Oklahoma and he was always wonderful. To me that just means more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The types of movies that Lucci did back then wouldn't fly today anyway. The old school steamy soapy TV movies fell out of favor long ago, unfortunately. Probably not considered "sophisticated" enough. Hell if I care, they were good television!

Lifetime and Hallmark come close, but even Lifetime has distanced itself from the way it was in the 80s and 90s and Hallmark is more heart-warming than pot-boiling.

I guess it just boils down to what definition of 'performer' is being spoken of. I think of who puts on a better show, who engages an audience more, who keeps the attention longer. And then, it's subjective and can go by each person. I appreciate the talents of those like West and will watch and support and praise and love them forever, but the Lucci type holds a special place in my heart. IDK. I do agree that Lucci in any other role is a step down from her as Erica, but I don't think of it as a bad thing. It'd be embarrassing if she constantly left AMC thinking that she could make it big somewhere else. I think she knows her talents and is aware of what she can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love those type of movies but I never enjoyed any of hers at all. The only way that I came close to enjoying was The Bride Wore Black.

There were so many others that starred the soap stars that I enjoyed a whole lot more esp. the one The Woman on the Ledge with Josh Taylor, Deidre Hall, Colleen Zenk, and Leslie Charleson. And then the other one with Wyndham, Francis and Walker in it. Forgot the name. I thought both of those were more entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never liked any of LaLucci's movies because she can't act. Of course, she was fortunate to be married to the role of Erica, but if she didn't have the presence or the determination and fearlessness to infuse Erica with the flouncy spoilt mannerisms and attitude, the character could have sunk. Consider how many young soap vixens start off hot and run out of steam quickly. I don't think that LaLucci has enough IT to make her shine over other more talented actors like Susan Flannery and Maura West, but I do think when Susan is on the frontburner on AMC, the show is brighter, stronger and more interesting. Erica was seriously damaged after kidnapping Maria's daughter, but LaLucci like the phoenix was able to help the character rise from the ashes.

While I think that there have been good acting and actors on the soaps, I think that truly good actors on the soaps are so rare that anyone who is half-way decent and makes the effort is considered good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Susan Lucci though used to be like Deidre Hall - she was a good actress.

You look at the Erica Kane of the 1970's. Susan Lucci acted. When Erica was onscreen she captivated you not because she was beautiful or not because she had IT but because she truly made you feel what she was saying and how she was saying and delivering it. Occassionally that Lucci still comes out but more often it is Lucci the star that we see and not Lucci the actress. Just as the Pine Valley and AMC of the 70's and early 80's was a totally different place - the Erica Kane of the 70's and very early 80's was a different character too. And Lucci was a different actress.

Same with Marlena Evans on Days. Really Hall stayed that way until JER's material got a hold of her and carried her way too over the top. You will never find a better actress than Deidre Hall when she acted opposite Jed Allan. Her scenes around her rape and the death of her son DJ were remarkable. But Deidre and Marlena have been like Susan and Erica - they both got bigger than the shows they were on. Occassionally they capture that magic again but it has been so rare for both.

Oh I cannot believe I left Jane Elliot off that list of great actors above. I was watching that terrible Elvis film the other day where Jane Elliot played the nun. Even in that terrible film Jane Elliot still delivered a good performance. She doesn't have the IT to make her a star but she has the talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Renee Goldsberry on OLTL. She turned a bit part and turned it into gold. When she was elevated to front burner status she easily became on of my faves. Hated some of the storyline she was in but I never got tired of watching her. She brought class every time she appeared on screen and the added diversity was a wonderful plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maura Who? And that's the bottom line, isn't it? Maura Flannery combined didn't have what it took to become the famous celebrity Lucci became. Their time on the frontburner didn't do anything special for anybody, including themselves. Lucci's made her a true celebrity--the only celebrity in daytime.

As for shining and being able to shine with more talented actors, Lucci has acted with David Canary and she shined, Finola Hughes and she shined, Vincent Irizarry and she shined, Kate Collins, James Mitchell, Ruth Warwick, Julia Barr...it's an endless parade of AMC talent...she she shined with every one of them. That's the special it factor that she has. I don't think Maura West would even be noticed in the scene if Lucci was at the top of her game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only reason why Susan Lucci can be the No1 of Daytime is because she is short/a bad enough actress/has a platic look/is aware enough of her shortcomingst that she doesn't try to move into primetime.

There are plenty of people who could have rivaled her in charisma, but the difference is that those people usually tried their shot at primetime (like Vanessa Marcil for example) and didn't come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
    • I'm excited for us to get back to a full weeks worth of episodes and also us beginning to move into the episodes filmed once the show premiered. We're already starting to see changes in the lighting and the way certain characters are styled. Of course we know this week we have our first recast as well. After the big Eva reveal, I hope the show continues to move into a positive direction and that we see them starting to fix some of the things we've all had issues with.
    • It seems like they may have been going in one direction for Andre and then changed their mind. He had this player/bachelor thing going at first where he was messing with Dani, seemed to be feeling Eva, and then somehow smitten by bland Ashley of all people. I feel like Ashley was supposed to be the one that finally made him want to be with someone and settle. The way he talked her up in those earlier episodes was really confusing. The wonderful, amazing nurse Ashley and conveniently she's unattainable because she has a partner, but he can't stop thinking of her and takes these busted pics of her. It was a mess. However, it all seems to have been dropped. I honestly feel like Andre can go. That may be an unpopular opinion but I don't need his breathy final syllable to be content with BTG. It's always like "There's gotta be another wh-ahyy"
    • This is where McLaibey falls apart. It becomes clear that McTavish had not thought past Brent/Marion...so the energy drops and she starts throwing things at the wall (Blakes twins, Lonatrat.)   Fans HATED this funeral. Everyone is mad at everyone else, which is fine, the death of a beloved community figure would give people a reason to come together...(Quint and Nola could come together at least for  a bit to support each other, Nola and VAn could finally admit they kinda, sorta like each other) Its just an example of McTavish's mean writing.   I have a feeling they were going to make Dahlia Frank's kid but they chickened out. Making Tina a prostitute didn't help, they could have been lovers when they were young but felt society pressure to part. Marcus took over David's role (you can't have two young black men at that time...)   Get used to it...this will happen, the same storyline over and over until the end.
    • Does anyone happen to have a recording or any footage of Jennifer’s funeral?
    • It's such a shame that the conflict couldn't be resolved in a mature way between the two actors.. especially since Albee was a bigger asset for the show in terms of character and his popular will they/won't they pairing with Deborah Saxon. One of the things about Edge was that it was just as popular with male viewers as it was with women.  It's one of things I think the show forgot in the final year or two with the deemphasis on the male characters.
    • Daytime Confidential did a podcast of the worst mothers in soaps and here were their lists.  5.Felicia Scorpio 4.Reva Shayne 3.Dina Mergeron 2.Helena Cassadine/Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions- Stephanie Forrester,Ann Douglas, Phyllis Summers and Joanna Manning Joshua 5.Anna Devane 4.Diane Jenkins 3.Ava Vitali 2.Shelia Carter 1.Brooke Logan Dishonorable Mentions-Alexis Davis, Felicia Scorpio, Eve Donovan, Heather Webber, Natalia Ramirez, Stephanie Forrester,and Ruth Martin Luke 5.Natalia Ramirez 4.Diana Coville 3.Helena Cassadine 2.Alexis Davis 1.Arlene Vaughn Dishonorable Mentions-Stephanie Forrester Now for my comments. Wonder what Ruth Martin ever did to this guy?!!! I mean Ruth Martin? I don't get it. Next, IMO they are just picking on Eve Donovan. Who is Dina Mergeron? Same question  Joanna Manning? Diana Colville Is that because of the bad DAYS retcon of her being Leo Stark's mother? All of the rest, CO-SIGN!  
    • Thanks! Looking forward to reading the rest!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy