Jump to content

Jackie Zeman Lands on Her Feet at HSN


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If that's a spray tan then she'll have sustained absolutely no UV damage at all. Although I don't really like the spray booth tanning because of the chemicals that are undoubtedly inhaled if users aren't absolutely flawlessly careful they are waaaaay better than a 'tanning' bed.

The sun is your friend in very limited doses and always with SPF 30 on your face and neck. A little sun damage on your arms never hurt anyone and the Vitamin D that is produced through sun exposure does your body a great deal of good health wise, but going for a dark tan increases skin cancer risk by huge margins and rapidly ages the skin. It simply is not safe and it never was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is a fascinating subject and I would agree that society -- dictated by Hollywood and the media -- puts enormous pressure on people, women especially, to look young at all costs. At all costs!

I'm not saying it is much better in other countries, but I was intrigued that in France, for example, women "of a certain age" seem to be openly admired in the street as much as the lithe young twentysomethings.

As for Jackie Zeman, I would love to see her back on GH as she is an important legacy character. And IA that Guza's not the one writing Bobbie out of the show. I hate what he's done to GH but I think he's always liked JZ, giving her great story like Carly returning into her life and relationships with Stefan and Ray.

I'm glad she's landing on her feet and doing other projects, though. JZ always strikes me as a very vibrant presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Isn't that a cool site DaytimeFan?? This kid is one of my favorite examples of how a few simple changes can make a dramatic difference:

http://www.facialsurgery.com/BAPg1rhf2lhc1..._ci45_hmc3.html

But I think DF's point about looking good for one's age, not looking younger, is a great point. People tease or scoff when I rave about Susan Lucci's looks, and no, I don't think she looks 30, but that's the point. What attracts me, impresses me even, is the fact that she looks so damn good for a woman in her early 60s. And she did that, she made it happen, so I say, You GO Susan! She looks better for her age now than she did for her age at several thens. There's that famous line about looking good later in life is earned, not some happy accident of youth. It's like a different form of attraction. When I look at Joan and Diahann in Dynasty, I am wowed by these very attractive late 40/early 50 something women, just in awe of how devastatingly beautiful these older woman are (especially Diahann, I don't think any woman on TV has ever looked more perfectly beautiful than she did as Dominique, her face is exquisite). Now, they don't incite the same reaction that Angelina Jolie or Jenna Haze do, but it's more of an appreciation for self-preservation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That example with the very young guy is very dramatic and it was really very simple work that achieved that sort of perfect result. He looks terrific.

I'm glad you got my point, it's about looking GOOD, not about looking YOUNG.

What I appreciate with an actress like Jess Walton or Lauren Koslow is that they don't look 30 or even their late 40s. They look like mid 50s or early 60s women who have kept it together and look fabulous as a result. They look like real women, just beautiful and without a ton of harsh, asymmetrical wrinkles and sags.

I also know what you mean about Joan Collins and Diahann Carroll on 'Dynasty'...they didn't look 40, they looked 50 but they looked GREAT (they both still do).

And for the record, the procedure that took Jackie Zeman from 'pretty' to 'uh-oh' was her cheek implants. Jackie is an example of wanting to look young, rather than looking good. Jackie never had cheekbones, she didn't have those apple shaped cheeks, never never never. For some reason, her surgeon convinced her or agreed to do cheekbone implants that changed the structure of her face. Basically, genetics didn't intend for Jackie Zeman to have cheekbones, she got them anyway and they simply don't match the rest of her face. Her eyejob, very nice, the nosejob, excellent, the condition of her skin, like clear glass, the lips, better than Joan Van Ark or Lisa Rinna...but the cheekbones, THAT was her mistake. Everyone thinks she had a facelift, she didn't...her face looks so different because it now projects out thanks to the cheekbone implants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This thread inspired me to change my avatar to showcase Stephanie Beacham. Though not as well known as Joan Collins or Diahann Carroll, she, too, epitomized the fortysomething woman back in late 80s Dynasty in all her glory. That first picture, with the cleavage and the nails! Pure Dynasty! :lol:

016.jpg026.jpg

041.jpgsb.jpg

All these actresses (divas, in the most beautiful sense of the word) were more than just comfortable in their own skin. They harked back to those 1940s and 50s movie stars like Bette Davis, Ava Gardner, Joan Crawford, Ingrid Bergman. Women who were women, not little girls. Who were not always cookie-cutter pretty but were all the more stunning for it.

IMO, Jackie Zeman's good-natured attitude does shine through the mistakes her surgeon has made on her face. It's a shame she had done what she had done because she already had so much dark-haired moxie and pretty to fall back on, you know? But I can only hope that in time the work done will settle. And that GH will recognize the error of their ways in sending her to Recurring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I adore Stephanie, talk about someone you would listen to read the phonebook. Her Sable Colby was magnificent, she was more blessed than Diahann in terms of material. But they all looked great. Stephanie is the youngest of the bunch, and they tried to age her with those grey streaks in her hair. Stupid. It's a soap, she's a rich bitch, it's okay if she looks five years older than her children and is married to a Brontosaurus. There are some very steamy photos of Stephanie early in her career.

It was interesting listening to Nolan Miller talk about these three ladies in his TV archive interview. Diahann and Stephanie wanted to be dressed like Joan (the peplum jackets), but the producers were adamant against it. Only one Alexis. That was her look. Diahann looked softer, like she was dressed for church instead of business, and Stephanie was more casual chic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy