Jump to content

2009: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Bellcurve - remember last year on B&B during summer when the show introcuded the 80s sitcom music, corny pop songs and quick-a-whip editing styles they also tried a very different take with dialogue.

An extremely awful one, but the mission seemed to be: freshen it up, folks! This is probably an example of a mandate put on the writers; regardless whether it came from CBS or Brad Bell personally. The show suddenly sounded a lot different with Shannon B. Bradley doing the worst jobs but probably obeying the mandate the most.

In general, even through script editing, you can hear the specific author if you ask me. At least when he gets the show and its characters. Amanda Beall seems to be a prime example; first she was given the young generation heavy episodes to write for on Y&R but now she's given broader episodes and for at least more than half the time she's doing good or better. She seems to be a worker bee fullfilling the mandate and so she went from corny and bland ABC-ness to a more stilted and complex Y&R dialogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

here is the thing tho, perhaps it was a mandate from above, somewhere above, or perhaps it was her own idea, perhaps it all just happened that way, perhaps that is the way she saw the characters voices, perhaps she hated amc and wanted to destroy it, perhaps her mission was to drive R Sinclair crazy, perhaps she was lazy, perhaps she thought she was bring brilliant, perhaps she was mad she wasnt writing sex and the city, perhaps none of it was her fault.

we dont know. we assume we know. we then assume our assumption is correct because of the little information we get. we dont know, and until one of us speaks to her directly i doubt we will ever will.

that said, all you have to rally judge a scriptwriter on is, well the scripts they write. same thing with HW's - even if a mandate comes from above they still tell the story. so if they cant make it work, it really is their fault. they are not innocent, but then again just because your not innocent doesn't mean you have committed a crime with intent.

but as showen here, just because a person wrote a certin way one place doesnt mean they will again. so perhaps we shouldnt so quick to judge and label them hacks and unholy and curse their kids (obviously, im being over dramatic).

we judge, we become critics, we stick by that view and hold the little we know about why we feel that way and most of the time there is SO MUCH MORE to the situation than that. and thats not to say that we should never judge and never be a critic again, but perhaps sometimes we are too harsh, but then aagin some things are so bad they deserve

and i know im 100% flip flopping, thats because i feel BOTH ways on this, of anyone understands that. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess I want to give the scriptwriters too much credit for their work. And I know that by the time they see those changes, they are seeing them right along with us. What I meant was, would the writer be able to go to the Head Writer or Editor and say, "in future episodes, can we change this/that."

I'm aware of the whole "lets be hip and trendy" stuff B&B stuff. I didn't know that also had to do with refreshing the dialogue as well. But it makes no sense to have Kay Alden(who is quoted as saying daytime shouldn't be a breeding ground for anything new or fresh) in charge of editing a show script to make it more "hip." It would be like asking John Conboy to produce "Ryan's Hope."

And that was my point and I am glad you restated this: even with butchering and slashing someone's work, you can hear the specific writer's style and voice. Yeah, we may give the scriptwriter too much credit for bad scripts that may have gotten watered down by the writing team(as brimike said), but I don't believe for a second a really bad script equates to bad rewrites. If that were the case, then wouldn't the entire scriptwriting team's work sound awful instead of Monday's dialogue being decent(despite the fact the stories featured are awful) and Tuesday dialogue being really really bad?

Anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does anyone know what is Hogan Sheffer's job at The Young and the Restless exactly? If not exactly, then I'd like to hear some theories.

Perhaps just a super-paid breakdown writer with zero to 0.00001% input in stories?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Monday May 12, Jordan and Laura meet at Lulu's house.

      Please register in order to view this content

        April 1, 2015 the childhood home of Luke, Bobbie and Pat Spencer Young Luke with his parents. (LW as his mother) Clip from April 1, 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H81KId9qb_I
    • As Blanche once said, "You're feeling magenta."

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Robert Benton, Director of Best Picture Winner ‘Kramer vs. Kramer,’ Dies at 92
    • Randomly came across this while on Instagram, but Shelly Burch (Delilah Ralston) and Danielle Harris (Sammi Garretson) are going to be on The Locher Room on May 20 at 7:30 PM EST.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Randy (Doug's friend who works for Joey) -- Joey told Randy weeks ago that Joey's plan was to get Doug into so much debt that Doug would be forced to get Vanessa's real estate holding turned over to Joey, to use for money-laundering.  That's been the plan all along, which the viewers knew.  The only thing new is that Joey finally told Doug this. I think Joey is written badly.  I also think Jon Lindstrom is doing "Now I am going to act menacing".   But I don't really feel the menace.  It's too overdramatic and it doesn't feel like a real person.  Jon is a fine actor on GH, so I don't know what's happening here -- the entire BTG mobster premise is badly designed/written.  I don't know if Guza pushed for a mobster storyline?  Or did Jon?  (Jon wrote a novel about Hollywood mobsters). It just doesn't fit.  It feels (to me) like this storyline for Jon was just shoved onto the canvas but it doesn't fit all all. Monday's scene of Mona coming into the "casino" to check up on where Leslie supposedly lost money in the slot machines -- and Randy explaining to Mona that there are no slot machines, there is nothing but the card room.  I had to laugh because they had characters comment that it's just a card room and not a casino -- the show is now acknowledging that there's nothing there.  If they are going to do this, then have it make sense for Fairmont Crest residents to visit a high-end glamourous casino, and not a random room with one table. So what money is Joey laundering? A while back, Joey told Vanessa that he knows about her sexual philandering because owns the escort service that she'd been using. But I don't care...  I'd just prefer that the entire mobster storyline go away. 
    • I caught up this past weekend. The show is better written, but I have been bored with the show. I did notice it ranked in the top 5 again this week, so that's a good sign.
    • I can't take this show seriously. I truly miss WJB writing this show. Bradley didn't inherit his dad's talent.
    • Maybe if there had been a good close up or two
    • I haven't had a chance to view the interview, but I'm glad Mike didn't get the part of Derek.  Derek is a badly written character. Any Ben Gavin screenshot from yesterday's show?
    • Wait, what? So, Martin’s not running for President anymore? Just like that?  I didn’t expect this storyline to be long term but I would’ve liked to see it play out for a little while longer, or at least until Martin’s secret was revealed. And definitely not fade out with a whimper. Sort of like Naomi’s lawsuit against Bill’s firm; what was the point of it all if it was just gonna wrapped up so easily and (probably) forgotten about?  Eva is still the breakout character though. I’m looking forward to seeing where she goes from here with everyone, especially if the twist that we’re all suspecting turns out to be true.  And I did find the gambling storyline interesting finally, now that we know Joey’s endgame. I’d like to see it play out and to see what happens to everybody involved in it.  As for Derek/Ashley… I wonder how it would’ve played out if they actually had cast Mike Manning as Derek. Yeah, the writing isn’t there but I imagine that Derek would have more of a personality lol and I also imagine that it would’ve made Ron Carlivati’s head explode

      Please register in order to view this content

      Ben Gavin did look hot though 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy