Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm terrified of that group ever being in power, even for 2 years. Once they get power they don't let go. They have too much media power and too much money as it is. Even when they controlled all bodies of Congress and the White House in 2004, the media still made sure the public blamed Democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Barring a miracle they are getting the Senate. Obama will be a lame duck who people will start to ignore as they take their cues from the democratic nominee. I think the most realistic hope is Obama just makes sure he vetoes every insane republican proposal and they wait til 2016 when the map favors the democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This thread has yet to discuss the upcoming vote that threatens to undo the world order. Will Scotland break up the UK and if so what happens to British nukes, the oil, the pound, the Queen, and everything else including the impact on Nato, the EU and the precedent for other territories in perhaps Spain and Canada to follow a similar path?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't tell if you're joking/over exaggerating Quartermaine but I have heard stuff along that lines regarding the economic ramifications of this vote.

As for the Republicans I'm both terrified and yet oddly excited about the possibilities of them having power for the last 2 years. For one thing I think it means immigration reform is completely dead which is good because the Latino/Immigration groups and their demand for all out amnesty has pissed me off to no end. Rep Luis Guitterez and that one lady who appears on Up w/ Steve Kornaki have done more to make me anti-immigration reform than billions of dollars spent by Karl Rove or any Republican candidate ever could. President Obama might still announce his executive order but I think he would just signing his own death warrant politically if he did so and destroy part of his own legacy as well.

However the Republicans will find a way to ruin their good luck. They always do. The question how far they'll go....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been reading about this for the last few weeks. The strange thing is that all 3 heads of England's political parties- Cameron, Clegg and Milliband refused the more autonomous 'middle path' that Salmond proposed in 2012, opting for a Yes or No referendum in 2014-- now the last minute proposal that all 3 English party leaders are pitching is strikingly similar to what they flat out refused two years ago.huh.png

Salmond and Sturgeon (I kid you not, these are their names) and other pro Scottish independence leaders are partly scoffing at the recent pitch, and the other part is asking for more specifics.

Perhaps if Cameron, Clegg, Milliband and Gordon Brown all sing backup for Al Green while he sings "Let's Stay Together"?

I believe tomorrow is the Vote. And some prognosticators are saying that polling indicates that it is too close to call.

Politics in Europe is a bit more complex than just the rise of Anti-Semitism. It has also been about the steady rise of Anti-Immigration from North & West Africa as well as from Eastern European countries like Poland, which is why you see far right parties like UKIP in England and the National Front in France making surprising gains in the last few years. That, with the mainly harsh consequences of austerity measures (interesting that both the far left and the far right parties seem to hate austerity measures) and the EU and euro seeming to not live up to its promise-- all blend into a toxic stew that threatens to promote nationalism and derail the Euro project.

I must admit a little surprise upon hearing about Sweden, which I've always read about having a pretty good standard of living. I would have thought Norway and Denmark before Sweden.

I do think that many of these Far Right Wing parties are hiding behind protectionist sensibilities to promote their agendas. And people who are skittish about the EU's bent on austerity and making everyone conform to one rigid standard is what is propelling people to take a second look at these nationalist parties. And then there are the ones who've always been on the extreme right margins who are longtime supporters.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep last I heard Begich is in good shape. I think Kay Hagan might be able to eak out a very very tiny victory in North Carolina and I'm praying she does.

I'm surprised Montana is basically being assumed to go Republican. I really thought Jon Tester would help more in that race. But given all the ups and downs perhaps it's for the best.

Iowa looks close but I think Braley will pull it out. That leaves Arkansas and Louisana. If Senator Landrieu can't win over 50% it goes to a run off and from what I'm hearing she'd be a huge underdog in that case but I hope that's not true. Meanwhile Mark Pryror seems to be falling behind Tom Cotton but President Clinton is campaigning very hard in AR so hopefully he gets close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the other way around. Norway and Denmark have a higher standard of living than Sweden. Copenhagen is Europe's most expensive city to live in and Norway is the second-richest country in Europe.

Sweden has also had a much higher rate of immigrants coming to the country, especially from the Balkan countries. 20% of the Swedish population are "immigrants", whereas in Denmark it's only 10% and in Norway about the same.

In Germany, we had elections in two federal states (Thuringia and Brandenburg) last weekend, and a rather new party, the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) won seats in both parliaments. This party is very conservative and is against the Euro. In both states they had about 13 % of the vote.

But the federal states that were part of the GDR before the fall of the Berlin Wall have always had different political views than the more liberal states in the West. Germany has been reunited for almost 25 years, but the discrepancy between East and West hasn't changed that much. In the public eye and in the media, people from the East are still seen as backward and cranky. Furthermore, these people still feel neglected by the government even though their cities are now in a good economical shape (thanks to all the money from the West), while the big cities in the West are mostly broke. It's a mad world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually wasn't saying that I thought of Norway and Denmark because of the economic standard of living but due to the recent tragic incidents that happened in Norway and Denmark in the past few years, namely the Theo van Gogh murder and then the mass shooting that happened at that conference/camp in Norway. I haven't heard of any thing of this sort happening in Sweden, which is why I was a bit surprised. I wasn't talking merely of earnings when I meant standard of living but overally quality of life, I guess. Sorry, if I was unclear (typing very quickly most times).

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The polls were off in their predictions, as they usually are. I wonder when legitimate news shows will stop relying on polls to provide the weight of expectations?

I wonder if Cameron & company will follow through with their last minute appeals to give Scots more autonomy. It seems Cameron is facing a backlash from members of his own party for mentioning these concessions earlier in the week. Now you have some members of the Conservative party threatening to caucus their own English Parliament.

Then you have Alex Salmond and certain pro Scottish independence voices, on the other side saying that this issue can be brought up again in a few years.

Is this over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve Kornacki, the Democrats in New Jersey, and that idiot reporter who's been on MSNBC like 24/7 should all be embarrassed to show their faces given the recent Chris Christie news. All this time has gone by and not a shred of evidence has come out tying the governor to the incident. While I'm absolutely shocked that the feds haven't found anything to indict on I am also a little bit happy about that. Because if he does run for President I want it to be a fair competition and for him to have a fair shot at matching up against Secretary Clinton (assuming they both make it out of their primaries).

But back to Kornacki and I think his name is Brian Thompson who covers NJ politics or whatever...those two have absolutely despicable in their attempts to throw every single type of conspiracy theory out there to make Chris Christie look bad. I mean the innuendo, the so called "insider info" and leaks they were getting from the grand jury about some of Christie's aides testifying against him or possibly have making a deal to indict Christie. It's just hilarious how far the two of them tried to smear him. Just like now Steve's next target is Governor Cuomo in New York (who I happen to like and respect since he isn't some crazy liberal who thinks it has the Democratic way or the high way).

Anyways the bottom line is Chris Christie isn't my most favorite Republican ever...In fact he probably wouldn't even make the Top 10 list. However I think the way this special committee has conducted this "investigation" and the way the media (and especially certain people on MSNBC) have covered it has really given credence to some of the complaints I hear from the Right...Chris Christie does act like a bully and probably was one in school at a certain point. His brashness is very offensive to me most of the time and I don't find his behavior to be that of a President but he still doesn't deserve to be attacked unfairly without a shred of proof only for the feds to conclude that there really isn't anything tying him to it.

/rant over

If he does get indicted I reserve the right to apologize to the above mentioned....lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The polls claimed it would be extremely close 50/50 but with well over a 1 million+ votes difference, it was 55/45 at best. It wasn't a landslide but not as close as was predicted.

The Bridge is ovah, as KRS-1 would say.

More disappointing is Christie pulling NJ out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which even the majority of state Republicans believe is a mistake. It's a cynical move on Christie's part to get backing from Americans for Prosperity A.K.A. the Koch Brothers. And it shows that he's willing to toss the people of NJ aside, so he can get in good with the Koch Brothers and their money.

Personally, I'll be surprised if he makes it past the first hurdle in 2016. He probably won't get any further than Giuliani did in '08.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jon Walsh was never really getting traction and then he dropped out because of plagiarism accusations. The woman running now is trying her best but it's a huge longshot.

What do you all think of the race in Kansas? Some think that Republicans will lose governor, secretary of state, AND Senate. I don't see it happening, especially not this year, but I guess we can live in hope.

Disgusting:

http://www.al.com/news/mobile/index.ssf/2014/09/were_gov_bentleys_comments_abo.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy